jerryskids

Well, yeah, this is known. A few sources: https://manhattan.institute/article/is-wikipedia-politically-biased https://nypost.com/2024/06/25/opinion/wikipedias-lefty-bias-measured-in-study-but-ive-felt-it-firsthand/ The above is an op ed from a conservative describing his experience, but it references the Manhattan institute article. Even wiki, watering down things as much as possible, felt compelled to let this entry fly which largely supports that they are left-leaning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideological_bias_on_Wikipedia There is a lot more out there about how the editors of Wiki have had significant bias towards the Left, if you want to research it.

Well, that's a link, from an admitted left-wing source. But giving it the benefit of the doubt that it has some truth in it, what in particular from it would you like to discuss that makes them neo-Nazi? I'm not saying it's not true, I'm just not inclined to parse through a leftist source to guess your intention.

Good win Pat. Thanks for beating Lager for me; keeps me in first in the overall standings.

This is like if Giants Fan and the Sanctuary had a special needs love child.

She wasn't an adult, they made her in a lab. So she was only a few days old. Which is kinda weird as well.

I addressed "allow," which you seem to mean we didn't have a wall or a large force preventing it. But people were sent back or, let's say, strongly encouraged to go back. There wasn't a wide open kumbaya where Mexicans came over and settled whenever or wherever they wanted. Local authorities saw to that.

No, we were talking about your assertion that American policy was to welcome them. It wasn't.

I've read a lot of history from that time, living in a border state. Fascinating stuff. Also, you are wrong: Mexicans were only welcome as occasional short-term labor. While it is true that there wasn't a major US federal force manning the border, let's just say that things had a way of... working themselves out back then, without a lot of red tape.

My neighbor has tangelo trees that hang over my fence. I get all I want for free! I mostly just peel them for old fashioneds. I've read that you can freeze the peels; and also dry slices. I need to look into doing that before this year's crop is done.

Categorically false. The United States for most of its history allowed a controlled number of WASPs from Western Europe. We have discussed this numerous times, with supporting links, yet you continue to throw this lie out there. It makes it difficult to have a serious discussion with you on this topic.

This is really helping our discussion.

Why would it raise the cost of homeowner's insurance if an illegal alien's house burned down without coverage?

Lol weak. Yeah, he's no Biden and Blinken, feeding Israeli plans to Hamas and funding organizations aligned with Hamas. How were those hostages doing under the previous regime? Oh I get it, they were oh so close to free under Biden?

Good post, I thought I'd bump it for @The Real timschochetsince he ignored it. Hey Tim, in your home state of Cali as well, illegal immigrants can get driver's licenses, and therefore can get car insurance. They just choose to not do it most of the time, despite your assertion that the VAST MAJORITY of such immigrants just want to assimilate and contribute. Maybe they know that Cali won't do anything to them if they get in an accident? Incentives, or lack of penalties, drive behavior. I'm not sure where you got the idea otherwise, but insurance is not a reason to make them citizens. HTH

Well played.

Lululemon had a banner plane flying over the WMPO pimping their new clothing deal with Homa and Min Woo Lee. At least Lee made the cut.

At least this didn't happen here. The UK seems on a path to collapse though... https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/02/09/albanian-criminal-deportation-halted-over-chicken-nuggets/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Tebok is Rusty

I would say that another "insider threat" is whatever Treasury bro is sending sensitive information to the Wired bros. It doesn't seem like anyone wants to stop it, though, since it keeps happening.

No, I'm not wrong on that. They are absolutely, positively political advocacy groups. No amount of strong, mistaken words on your part changes that fact. Tell us in your own words why you think BIID is a mental disorder, but trans isn't.

All of these groups are political, lobbying organizations. Scientific American has had nothing to do with science for years, we've discussed this. Use your own words to explain why you think BIID is different than trans.

I thought of anorexia (and bulimia) but went with BIID because it would theoretically involve surgery/procedures to make the patient's body "right." But those work as well.

Why not? Their mind says that they should be blind. They were born in the wrong body; one with working eyes. The solution should be to blind them.

1.01 for the Arnold Palmer: Scottie Scheffler.