jerryskids

Klobuchar lacks the charisma to become POTUS but she seems like she'd be a good leader. Minnesota has shown they don't care about charisma (Tim Walz), so that's in her favor. The question is if Omar and the Somali mafia think she'll play ball with them.

Wrong thread. I think you meant to tell me I shouldn't be noticing Mamdani's communist appointee.

MDC exhibiting the classic Leftist "face tattoo syndrome." It's not their fault for getting the face tattoo (appointing a communist), it's my fault for noticing! Also:

It's not hyper focus; both the terrorist defense lawyer and the communist tenant director were all over the news. For all I know, he has hired a normal person for some job and I've never heard of it.

Remember in HS when the student council got to go to City Hall and pretend to be the mayor and his staff for the day? That's what this administration is beginning to remind me of. They brought in a bunch of children, but at the end of the day, they said you know what? Why don't you just run it for realz, wheeee! So far they've appointed a chief counsel who spent his career defending Islamic terrorists, and a tenant director who hates whites and individual property ownership. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cea_Weaver

It's MDS to post a link of Mamdani's appointed tenant director saying they are going to move to a collective property model.

Is it healthy to be upset enough about a flag that you spend millions of dollars, thousands of hours, form minority-filled committees, and ultimately change the flag to look a lot like a Somali flag?

The mainstream media just circle-jerk reports the same source which says what they want it to say. For the government, is it Walz or the fake hijab wearing Lt. Governor who is on the up and up? Walz withdrew from the governor's race because of it. I haven't seen your comments on that; in your mind he probably withdrew because Trump pardoned some random white guy. Or MAGA Nazis. The rest of us will wait until they do actual audits and figure out how much fraud is going on. Every post of yours will age poorly, it's just a matter of how much. My advice would be for you to sit this out for a while, but I don't think your capable of letting go your marching orders.

Weak sauce, not unexpected from you, to toss out a PDF and claim it supports your position without pointing out what in the PDF supports your position. Then again, had you read it, you would see that the new flag effort was clearly intended to pander to intersectional cultures.

Well, it's mostly about Somali day care fraud, but I did introduce some Iranian day care fraud in Cali. Probably best if we keep it to day care fraud, mostly by Somalis. Good to know that this is your reaction to my post. I'm the one following the party line, though.

Meet Mamdani's new tenant director. She says that NYC will transition to a collectivist property model.

I can't believe Walz could have been VP, one step from running the country. We dodged a bullet by avoiding him and Harris.

Best case for the Somalis, and worst case for America, is that in the end, the fraud is so pervasive in so many states by so many groups of people, that they get lost in the enormity of it all.

Who did you vote for, woman?

It's all a lie! That's it! That's the story!

If she does, then good I guess? He probably wants lots of things. No more oil, weapons, or training for our enemies. Work with us to prevent drug shipments into the US. Let us fix the infrastructure so they can get back to 1970s level production, and yes, get some of that oil at a favorable price, basically recouping the cost of such an investment. I strongly doubt that we will go in and claim that we own the oil there. But we can add that to things to monitor.

Speculation I heard today is that our people are concerned that since Machado doesn't control the military, to hand the country over to her now would be to just give it back to the bad guys. This is what Trump meant by "doesn't have the respect..." Instead the short term plan is to see if Rodriguez got the FAFO memo and is willing to cooperate until a more permanent long-term regime is in place.

Again, you misunderstand the math. It is not 1 to 4 vs. 4 to 13, it is 1 to 4 vs. 40000 to 130000. or 10000 to 40000 (which is also statistically significant) vs. 40000 to 130000. You don't get the math, that's cool, let's move on. Thank you for your role in that drug.

Sorry, in all of this straw man, I missed your answer: Mamdani says he's concerned about Venezuelans in NYC. Do you think those people are concerned about the regime change? Or care about how it was done? These are the people who by and large escaped Maduro, or Chavez before him. He really has the pulse of the people there!

you'd be a... monkey death car?

Mamdani says he's concerned about Venezuelans in NYC. Do you think those people are concerned about the regime change? Or care about how it was done? These are the people who by and large escaped Maduro, or Chavez before him. He really has the pulse of the people there! Meanwhile Mamdani is on record as saying he will exhaust all legal options to arrest Netanyahu in the city with the largest Jewish population in the world (2nd to Tel Aviv in metro area). Somehow he's not concerned about them.

Cited for driving 101 in a 60. https://www.azcentral.com/story/sports/nfl/2025/06/18/shedeur-sanders-speeding-cleveland-browns-qb-driving-101-mph-ticket/84266290007/

I gave you two options: "entirety of behavior" or "capture of Maduro". You are too much of a troll to answer that. I suppose I'm supposed to glean that you mean the former (entirety of behavior)? If so, congrats on your big win over no one, since I argued only for the strong increase in approval, which is borne out by the polls. Nevertheless, let me educate you on why your example sucks and you don't understand polls. Let's focus on a concept called "statistical significance." Your example of a change from 1 our of 1M to 4 out of 1M is not statistically significant. Mathematically, you can plug this into ChatGPT to get the explanation: "Let's say that a poll of 1M people gets 1 No vote and 999999 Yes votes. A subsequent poll of 1M people gets 4 No votes and 999996 Yes votes. Is this change statistically significant?" Now let's change the prompt to: "Let's say that a poll of 1M people gets 40000 No votes and 960000 Yes votes. A subsequent poll of 1M people gets 130000 No votes and 870000 Yes votes. Is this change statistically significan" The result: Put into words, your 1 vs 4 example is, for all intents and purposes, essentially 0 vs. 0, from a confidence interval perspective. Now, you might say that I made up the 1M sample size, which is true. You still used it to show your lack of math acumen, but regardless, addressing this concern: the number of actual samples introduces the concept of confidence interval (CI), which is needed to determine whether or not the changes are statistically significant. I looked at the PDF links and, as near as I can tell, only December PDFs are provided, and I don't see any mention of CIs. But presuming that the CIs are within a few percent, a change from 4% to 13% would be statistically significant. If for some reason the CIs are much larger such that the change isn't statistically significant, that brings up the question of the accuracy of the poll. This is why I said you may be unwittingly supporting "pollz shmollz lol". Basically, either the improvement is statistically significant, or the poll is so bad that it can't differentiate results that are 9% points apart. I sincerely hope that when you worked with pharma companies, you were just a code monkey putting in formulas that the smart people developed, and that you weren't instead developing them let alone interpreting them.

I'm sure the Pats are happy to contribute to his defense fund.

That's a lot of words that don't answer my question. Answer it, and I'll do you the courtesy of showing you how you don't understand how polls work.