jerryskids

Out of bed and digging deep into your moderate spreadsheet. Did you at least get a coffee first? I don't think you took your morning meds, tho. Yes, it's beyond belief that there were paid protesters at Kamala Harris rallies. She was so organically popular! Seek help.

Actually, correlation does imply causation. It doesn't require it or prove it, though. In this case, one would look at possible causal factors. Some causal factors might be rape gangs and the general propensity of migrants from Muslim countries to be quite rapey. I know, it's a stretch. It's a conundrum wrapped in an enigma.

No I don't. You hate your own people, though.

I just said I made a clarification.

Yes, I had so, so many definitions. Any muslims... wait, no, that was you. Extremists... oops, again you. I did make that one clarification, so I understand the confusion. It's just as you predicted... no you didn't. You meanwhile say I hate Muslims like I hate trans; yet another subject you made no effort to understand my point. Seems like middle school woke conclusions with no nuance is a pattern here.

Ana Kasparian was hot in this one. Sitting there drinking what looked like a whiskey, offering that things like self-identification for trans in California is idiotic, definitely wood. Also, JK Rowling is pretty GILFy for 60. And Emma... Maybe I'm just horny.

No I didn't; that's you making stuff up again. I said "large concentrations from radicalized origins," which includes Somaliland, MN, not just your 1%. Although such cultures allow, protect, and perhaps encourage the behavior of the 1%.

Hey @dogcows, I forgot to add brotherly rape gangs to the list for Somaliland. This from Mark Steyn. He's British so he starts with them, but it's a lead in to MN: Just hold it there for a moment - and let me ask you as one man of the world to another: when you're at home of an evening and thinking you'd rather go out for a gang-rape than a meatball sub, do you take along your brother? or your cousin? or your uncle? Or would that make conversation round the Thanksgiving table a little icky? Twenty sodding years ago, the late Martin Amis wondered why I would write about anything so serious as the west's demographic death-spiral by way of Dean Martin jokes. Well, because unlike Francis Fukuyama and other experts, Dino predicted a lot of this. As he was wont to sing on Rat Pack nights: As we have discussed with respect to France, Germany and other Continental countries, until diversity became our strength, gang-rape was an extremely rare phenomenon; now it is routine. Beyond that, gang-rape by multiple members of the same family was all but unknown. But in the new post-western west, members of the same biraderi (Urdu, from the Persian, literally "brotherhood") work in the same business, marry each other, organise themselves politically, and go out raping together. In Rotherham, they're Pakistani. In Minneapolis, they're Somali. What would you do if you wanted to incentivise the exciting multiculti phenomenon of gang-rape? Well, you'd do exactly what the impeccably "progressive" Hennepin County Attorney, Mary Moriarty (pictured at top right), did. You'd do a "plea deal" with Mr Mohamed: Mr Mohamed is a career rapist; raping is what he does. It is not known whether he has other interests, such as stamp-collecting or dogsledding, but the belated federal (ie, non-Minnesota) indictment suggests his priorities: How is it that a multiple gang-rapist walks free? As those of us who have engaged in the thankless task of trying to get American "prosecutors" to put career criminals behind bars well know, it all starts very butch - he's facing forty-seven felony charges each carrying a minimum sentence of twenty-nine years! - and then gets plea-dealed down to a couple of misdemeanours and an unpaid parking ticket. The County Attorney isn't talking, but her spokesperson - the usual pronoun-laden pajama boy - is defending the deal: Ooh, a "felony conviction"!!! That sounds scary!!!!! But does it actually make any difference to a respected member of the Somali "community"? Does it, say, prevent him from resuming all the rapey-rape? Mr Mohamed received his super-butchy-butch "felony conviction" in May. Four months later, on September 15th, he seized Victim 5 and drove her to a motel in Bloomington. On September 21st, she managed to escape. That week's on Mary Moriarty. Ms Moriarty has form in this regard: She indulges not just gang-rapists but killers. Zaria McKeever was shot five times, including one shot point-blank in the head, but the County Attorney thought that the killer would benefit from a two-year rehabilitation programme at a juvenile facility rather than banging him up in the Big House. So even Minnesota's Governor Jazz Hands was moved to act and took the case away from her. Yet, in fairness to the County Attorney, young Miss McKeever was murdered by a black man in the George Floyd state. That's the original systemic-racist paradigm. Same in England - where thirty years ago the report into the Stephen Lawrence case found the Metropolitan Police guilty of "institutional racism" and thereby inaugurated the new culture of British bureaucracy, where the absolute over-riding priority is not to be perceived as "racist" lest you get tied up in sensitivity-training hell for the next six months. It was entirely predictable that electorally vital "communities" in towns like Rotherham would soon see the opportunities in such an environment. And, as it goes for Pakistanis in Yorkshire, so too for Somalis in a demographically transformed Minnesota. And so cobwebbed white-guilt victim/oppressor narratives are effortlessly extended to newcomers who showed up twenty minutes ago and have no reason to be other than eternally grateful to the death-wish societies that made the mistake of taking them in: no Somali ever sat at an Alabammy lunch counter; no Rwandan was ever colonised by the British Empire. In fact in 2009 Rwanda voluntarily joined the British Empire in order to lessen the likelihood of another 1990s-style genocide. That's how sod-bollockingly stupid is the whole "progressive" Mary Moriarty "But think of the poor gang-rapists!" narrative. Some states have a "nice" reputation - which invariably becomes a lagging indicator. Thus Minnesota, thanks to Lake Wobegon and The Mary Tyler Moore Show and a few other cultural artifacts. Garrison Keillor has introduced no Somali gang-rape biraderi to his charming stories of small-town life, although I would urge him to do so: since he got MeTooed, the guy has nothing to lose. No danger of Abdimahat Bille Mohamed getting MeTooed, is there? The Powerline blog covers in real time the Somalification of their state, and today Bill Glahn pushes back at the suggestion that the Land of 10,000 Rapes has fallen prey to the same evil as a dying England: Philosophically, I do not really support the idea of the Feds playing catch up, as it's pretty obviously double-jeopardy, and ever more openly so. But America is a land of legalisms rather than law, so whatever. However, even that is only possible because of the current administration. A year ago, President Autopen would not have done this. So Minnesota not being London is predicated on the Democrats eternally nominating a ticket as obviously club-footed and repellent as Vice President Cackles and Governor Jazz Hands. Is that really what you're willing to bet the future on? After all, Hennepin County cheerfully elected a county attorney on the side of the gang-rapists. For the last thirteen months, the United States has demonstrated the central aspect of the thesis of America Alone - that in critical aspects it remains different from the more obviously suicidal parts of the west. The real question is whether it is sufficiently different to affect the ultimate outcome. As I have said, absent severe course-correction, we are in the last fifteen years of anything remotely recognisable as the western world. No country other than Somalia - or the breakaway Somaliland - needs a single Somali other than Ayaan Hirsi Ali. And yet there is the Hennepin County Attorney loosing them on Minneapolis in order that its maidenhood should grow accustomed to the progressivism of gang-rape. https://www.steynonline.com/15792/minneapolis-twinned-with-rotherham

I introduced Somaliland, MN as a concern and a net negative to the country because of their extreme welfare, system abuse, lack of assimilation, and tribal approach to politics: You won't engage on that, so you've turned this into a strawman about every Somali being a radical extremist. But if you are going to pull a number out of thin air for your strawman, there are 80K-100K Somalis in MN, so 1% means 800-1000 radical extremists.

If I hadn't decided to go with ETs, Iran was my next (quasi-serious) answer. Also, China has had an outsized amount of funding at MIT, unfortunately. Occam's Razor says a family member or jilted lover, which is the case in 98-ish % of such situations.

Head of the Plasma Science Fusion Center. I'm going... ... ETs. They don't want us to develop a warp drive!

I missed that prediction, and I discussed your statement about Dearborn in a post to Fnord (I thought he was the one who said it, sorry about that), but if you acknowledge that concentrations like Somaliland in MN are a concern, then we are in agreement.

Glad that you agree with my summary. I believe I said that I disagree with all executive (presidential and gubernatorial) pardons. We have a whole judicial branch of government whose job it is to dole out sentences as per the laws enacted by the legislative branch, and pardons don't seem to fit that model. I may also have said that I don't know enough to understand why Trump would have pardoned him. His funding of Hamas is a good reason NOT to do so, but it doesn't explain the reason to pardon him. I was somewhat busy when that was going down and didn't dig into it, to be honest. Hopefully you can figure out how to wedge this response into your spreadsheet. :thumbsup:

Is this true? I thought I learned today that 80% of the Somalis in MN are on welfare because they are new and still assimilating.

Tim: Show that NSJP supports Hamas, and not just a bunch of chapters, it's inconceivable that they would support Hamas! Jerry: Here are two examples. Tim: The first doesn't count because Hamas runs the country. The second doesn't count because it's just an employee of the NSJP in an NSJP newsletter, that doesn't mean anything! (I literally lol'd typing this one.) Bonus Tim: Surely your not saying Mamdani believes in EVERYTHING that SJP does, just because he went through the effort to form a chapter?! Jerry: Don't call me Shirley.

I know right? Show me a link, but not one which shows that their parent organization is tied to Hamas funding: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Letter-to-National-SJP-5.29.24.pdf Certainly not a quote from "The Written Resistance," the National SJP newsletter which started around October 7. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F55MYJNSoFgm-NKI7HM4Wch3-iGKHFrS/view Moderate Tim thinks it is unreasonable to think the National SJP supports Hamas. It's only chapters! He so readily believes anything that fits his Leftist worldview, and so fervently dismisses anything that doesn't.

First, I'll accept your tacit acknowledgment regarding your lack of understanding or caring of the context regarding Kirk's comments about the listed black women. Since you completely ignored that part and all. To the part you did comment on above: I keep saying "hit the right note" because that's exactly what TFP said, that you took issue with: Perhaps TFP didn't consider it "hitting the right note" for Omar to issue politically correct words, then soon after stomp on Kirk's grave with out-of-context statements intended to fool her leftist low-intelligence supporters? Or if you think it hit the right note, then perhaps you think Trump hit the right note by stating in the beginning of his TS post that it was sad that the Reiners were killed. I mean sure, shortly thereafter he went in another direction, but that first part of the statement, it hit the right note!

Wouldn't bet against it. With his distance and iron play, I'm surprised he hasn't won it yet.

I was between BHB and 5 pts on this one. Other than mine, of course.

I'm done engaging with you, tard. Sorry, moderate tard.

And here is another person who is making no attempt to understand what I am saying. Carry on.

Regarding the bolded, while they are not interchangeable, Islam suffers from the lack of a reformation, and also a lack of a leader who could steer the greater religion.

Well sure, and we should (and do) keep a close eye on the Branch Davidian types when they arise. But it's a matter of degrees. It seems like your entire argument is "there might be some whackjobs in any group, so we shouldn't treat any groups differently." I disagree with this approach as it is a crappy risk assessment strategy.

Sorry, I must have confused you with @dogcows

Again, not the religion, the culture in radicalized areas which is built on the religion.