jerryskids

Also dumb: NFL players with dreds hanging out the back, particularly skill position players who can legally be tackled by them.

That's actually a great point. Perhaps a passive aggressive way of saying he (uncle) wasn't really bought into his nephew becoming his niece, but he said the nice words because he loved him/her?

I don't understand this letter salad. Does this mean "this noise"?

I'm talking prior. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Palestine In 1996 they elected Fatah/PLO, which had been a terrorist organization but arguably wasn't quite that bad in 1996. But your point is valid: mostly they didn't have elections because for their entire existence they were warring bands of tribes which fought each other, and as such never had a country. It was only the formation of Israel which allowed powerful groups to focus the Palestinians' war energy on a common enemy.

That's very sad, and pathetic that people would say stuff like that to someone. Also, I would never say that transing is supposed to prevent suicide. The psychiatric community used to be better at both (1) identifying people who thought they were trans, but weren't, and (2) addressing the underlying mental issue comorbidities that people who associate with trans experience. These days, it's enough to say you think you're trans, and people like Real Tim think the only reason trans people have depression is because we heteros are mean to them.

Good guys being good guys in your eyes led to billions of dollars of UNRWA-syphoned "aid" being used to build terror tunnels under hospitals, schools, and mosques. Those savages only understand one thing - strength. And by "savages" I mean both Hamas and Palestinian "civilians," although the line is often quite blurred. There is a reason that time and again the Palestinians elect strong terror groups into power. It would 100% happen again, if they are allowed to vote.

Hopefully you are trying to make a point that the odds aren't 0%, twice in one day, woohoo! Otherwise you are just being an insufferable tard. Also twice in one day.

TheGeneral is strong in his convictions.

I suspect a lot of them do, yes.

Well, Trump does like to troll. And keeping open the perceived possibility of running keeps the money flowing in.

We agreed to be liberal on accepting either album or song release if it fell within the 90s.

"Undocumented individual" is non-descriptive. "Individual" is meaningless, and "undocumented" sounds like a person who should be here, but we just haven't gotten around to providing them their documents. "Illegal" is an adjective which accurately describes the noun "alien," because they are an alien in this country and have either entered or stayed illegally. I try not to just call people "illegals" because I can see how that is degrading, but I refuse to use an inaccurate, non-descriptive phrase because some blue haired sky screamers have decided it is offensive.

says the woman who doesn't vote for president, but whines like a little girl on a message board about the president.

Appreciate the detailed breakdown. I knew Creed would get me in trouble, although I've learned there are a few other Creed fans here. Funny thing is, my plan was to take All Star (which you gave a 9), but 5-points sniped me. Also interesting what songs you don't consider alt. I would say Linger by the Cranberries is not alt at all; the only reason it might be thought of alt is because the same group did Zombies. But, most of their songs, while I like them, are kind of elevator music-ish IMO.

Bannon, huh? The guy Trump fired back in 2017. Seems he wants to become relevant again more than anything. Anyway, I found and watched the video of his interview with the BBC, just a brief clip. The idea that there is some secret cabal who views Trump as a heaven-sent instrument to implement I presume Project 2025 or some such, and will find some machination to get Trump back into office in 2028, sounds more like a David Baldacci novel than reality. But, it's not completely implausible. After all, nobody knows who really ran the country during Biden's term. So I will agree that there is a non-zero chance, and all you moderates can continue your sky screaming with my blessing.

Clever. Who did you vote for? If you didn't vote, you are a woman as I described above.

You are a woman who voted for nobody so that he could biotch about whoever won on a FF message bored. Just leave and let us men talk about the hurricane.

Patriots record for highest completion percentage in a game: Drake Maye: Maye >>>>> Brady

I agree, and possibly even worse is the super long, thick braids and dreds. At the highest level where a few .001s can be the difference between gold and no podium, it boggles my mind that people would wear any unnecessary weight. On a related-ish topic, I can't believe that pitchers are allowed to wear big gold chains to flop around and distract the batter.

That's your evidence? He makes the one comment about how he hadn't thought about it, 15 seconds talking about his poll numbers and ending wars, then 2 of the 3 minutes propping up Marco and JD as great candidates, and calling Crockett and AOC low-IQ. In the end someone asked about him being VP, and he said "I could do that, but it would be tricky and the people wouldn't want it." That sure sounds like a guy planning to end around they system to remain king. Here, I'll end some back and forth: Me: SCOTUS. You: SCOTUS licks Trump's yam bags and will do whatever he wants. Me: Lack of confidence in the courts is another reason for some whackjob Leftist jihadist to try to assassinate somebody. Again.

This guy is smart:

You aren't a serious poster. Also, if you believe this, of course you think he is the devil reincarnated. This mindless adherence to TDS is how assassination attempts happen. Not you personally, but someone otherwise less stable. It's like Islamic jihadists. For a person who seems otherwise quite intelligent, you just don't seem to get that immunity ruling. I tried to explain it to you, but I don't recall your response. If you think POTUS has blanket immunity, you are wrong. Also, if you think SCOTUS will let him stay, Ima put you in with Ron above. There are four obvious no votes (incl. Roberts). You are saying all 5 strict constitutionalists are going to throw the constitution out the window. Alrighty then.

You know he left on Jan 20, 2021, right?

The Supreme Court. Is this a trick question?

I see a lot of people need to touch some grass today. Someone please walk me through how this might work.