BLS

It's QLazz Tyler.....Be careful

Hey thanks. I was drunk...(and still am)...but go fuck yourself either way. Thanks again.

It's canDiDate...and this is why Ron Paul's chances are looking so good. If he WERE to win the Republican nomination, he would be going up against either a black man, or a crazy white woman. It's pure genious.

There's a BIOS jumper on the motherboard. Close the circuit by using the jumper, and reboot. It will bypass the BIOS password.

I'll take 2 Qlazz.....

OK...Let me put it this way...if you're a dumbass enough to put your fingers in my mouth, not only will I bite....I'll bite the ###### right OFF.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqGY6V9Jm7k A rather cheesy, but good song that nobody probably knows (dedicated to his best friend Dimebag Darrell)

this video basically epitomizes what Dr. Paul stands for. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWfIhFhelm8 Also...Boz...after watching those immigration videos you just showed me....I can't even explain how upsetting that is. I'd like to know the conext of those demonstrations though because that can explain alot.

I will tell you this much...if anybody ever 'fishhooked' me, he'd have NO more than 9 fingers when it was all over. Stick your fingers in my mouth.....c'mon.

I will give you this much, and we can go from there: One of the great ironies of the prohibition era was the fact, noted by the Wickersham Commission, that women happily took to drink during the experimental decade, and, what is more, did so in public. As the counterpart of the WCTU, the Women's Organization for National Prohibition Reform was founded, stating in its declaration of principles that Prohibition was "wrong in principle" and "disastrous in consequences in the hypocrisy, the corruption, the tragic loss of life and the appalling increase of crime which has attended the abortive attempt to enforce it" (Dobyns, 1940: 107). Drinking at an earlier age was also noted, particularly during the first few years of Prohibition. The superintendents of eight state mental hospitals reported a larger percentage of young patients during Prohibition (1919-1926) than formerly. One of the hospitals noted: "During the past year (1926), an unusually large group of patients who are of high school age were admitted for alcoholic psychosis" (Brown, 1932:176). In determining the age at which an alcoholic forms his drinking habit, it was noted: "The 1920-1923 group were younger than the other groups when the drink habit was formed" (Pollock, 1942: 113). AVERAGE AGE AT FORMATION OF DRINK HABIT Period Males Females 1914 21.4 27.9 1920-23 20.6 25.8 1936-37 23.9 31.7 ETA LINK...so you know I'm not 'making it up'. http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Librar...ies/nc/nc2a.htm The point is...we learned this SAME lesson almost 90 years ago. And we're freaking repeating it.

This is my first LOL today....thank you!

I'm trying to find you a video or article that states this specifically because I know I've read/heard it very recently. Of course this is NOT a huge 'issue' that he's going to 'run on', so it's a bit tougher to find. But here is something he wrote about it: War On Terror? It's As Bad As War on Drugs By Rep. Ron Paul I would like to draw an analogy between the drug war and the war against terrorism. In the last 30 years, we have spent hundreds of billions of dollars on a failed war on drugs. This war has been used as an excuse to attack our liberties and privacy. It has been an excuse to undermine our financial privacy while promoting illegal searches and seizures with many innocent people losing their lives and property. Seizure and forfeiture have harmed a great number of innocent American citizens. Another result of this unwise war has been the corruption of many law enforcement officials. It is well known that with the profit incentives so high, we are not even able to keep drugs out of our armed prisons. Making our whole society a prison would not bring success to this floundering war on drugs. Sinister motives of the profiteers and gangsters, along with prevailing public ignorance, keep this futile war going. Illegal and artificially high priced drugs drive the underworld to produce, sell and profit from this social depravity. Failure to recognize that drug addiction, like alcoholism, is a disease rather than a crime, encourage the drug warriors in efforts that have not and will not ever work. We learned the hard way about alcohol prohibition and crime, but we have not yet seriously considered it in the ongoing drug war. Corruption associated with the drug dealers is endless. It has involved our police, the military, border guards and the judicial system. It has affected government policy and our own CIA. The artificially high profits from illegal drugs provide easy access to funds for rogue groups involved in fighting civil wars throughout the world. Ironically, opium sales by the Taliban and artificially high prices helped to finance their war against us. In spite of the incongruity, we rewarded the Taliban this spring with a huge cash payment for promises to eradicate some poppy fields. Sure. For the first 140 years of our history, we had essentially no Federal war on drugs, and far fewer problems with drug addiction and related crimes was a consequence. In the past 30 years, even with the hundreds of millions of dollars spent on the drug war, little good has come of it. We have vacillated from efforts to stop the drugs at the source to severely punishing the users, yet nothing has improved. This war has been behind most big government policy powers of the last 30 years, with continual undermining of our civil liberties and personal privacy. Those who support the IRS's efforts to collect maximum revenues and root out the underground economy, have welcomed this intrusion, even if the drug underworld grows in size and influence. The drug war encourages violence. Government violence against nonviolent users is notorious and has led to the unnecessary prison overpopulation. Innocent taxpayers are forced to pay for all this so-called justice. Our eradication project through spraying around the world, from Colombia to Afghanistan, breeds resentment because normal crops and good land can be severely damaged. Local populations perceive that the efforts and the profiteering remain somehow beneficial to our own agenda in these various countries. Drug dealers and drug gangs are a consequence of our unwise approach to drug usage. Many innocent people are killed in the crossfire by the mob justice that this war generates. But just because the laws are unwise and have had unintended consequences, no excuses can ever be made for the monster who would kill and maim innocent people for illegal profits. But as the violent killers are removed from society, reconsideration of our drug laws ought to occur. A similar approach should be applied to our war on those who would terrorize and kill our people for political reasons. If the drug laws and the policies that incite hatred against the United States are not clearly understood and, therefore, never changed, the number of drug criminals and terrorists will only multiply. Although this unwise war on drugs generates criminal violence, the violence can never be tolerated. Even if repeal of drug laws would decrease the motivation for drug dealer violence, this can never be an excuse to condone the violence. On the short term, those who kill must be punished, imprisoned, or killed. Long term though, a better understanding of how drug laws have unintended consequences is required if we want to significantly improve the situation and actually reduce the great harms drugs are doing to our society. The same is true in dealing with those who so passionately hate us that suicide becomes a just and noble cause in their effort to kill and terrorize us. Without some understanding of what has brought us to the brink of a worldwide conflict in reconsidering our policies around the globe, we will be no more successful in making our land secure and free than the drug war has been in removing drug violence from our cities and towns. Without some understanding why terrorism is directed towards the United States, we may well build a prison for ourselves with something called homeland security while doing nothing to combat the root causes of terrorism. Let us hope we figure this out soon. We have promoted a foolish and very expensive domestic war on drugs for more than 30 years. It has done no good whatsoever. I doubt our Republic can survive a 30-year period of trying to figure out how to win this guerilla war against terrorism. Hopefully, we will all seek the answers in these trying times with an open mind and understanding. CP Ron Paul is a libertarian/Republican who represents Texas's 14th congressional district. http://www.counterpunch.org/paul1.html When you start to look PAST what you see and 'know' now...you start to realize more and more how INSIGHTFUL he is. He's beyond the majority of us....He is not afraid to tackle the tough issues, and although on paper his ideas initially seem 'whacky', the more you learn, the more you go 'hmmmmm.....never though of it that way'. Anyway..that's how it goes for me.

Here's the argument I have for legalizing drugs: Why not? We spend a ton of money fighting the war on drugs. Because there is a demand for them, by making it illegal, you incite crime. The cost of drugs is higher, because the cost of 'doing business' can be astronomical. Then you get people committing crimes to get the money to buy drugs. You legalize them...you eliminate that criminal element. You also cut also that federal spending. To top it off, you also tax those products. And in the long run, end up making money.

Mike Vick is very irresponsible, silly black man.

Here's the thing...I HATE politicians in general. I think they are all liars and partially corrupt in one shape, fashion or form. Ron Paul is the first politician I can ever recall watching and reading about, and NOT finding ONE single thing bad.

I really truly believe Ron Paul is a last ditch effort to save this country. I've never been more enamored with a politician.

Oh yeah...what happened to first 100 hours?

I guess I gotta add Spi.... and Wetba.... to the list..... er..... What I meant was that those are some very irresponsible Spanish speaking folk.

For those of you who think he 'can't win'...he may have as much now as John McCain. http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=43192

Cool. Seriously..take some time to read up on Ron Paul. He'll make you a believer.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2

Let me help you. I'm BLACK LABEL SOCIETY..you know B. L. S. aka Fruitjacket.... I've been posting on this bored under BLS and Fruitjacket since 99. No, it is not my main source. My main source is www.google.com

That is a VERY irresponsible black man right there. Shame on him.