TimHauck

I believe they were shooting in the direction of people seeking aid. I don’t believe they targeted women and children in doing so, knowing that it was mostly men at the aid drops. I’ll even say that they likely weren’t “trying” to kill innocent people when they did that, maybe just scare ‘em a bit but not be too upset if they did kill them. Or maybe they saw a couple people they thought were Hamas mixed in with the hundreds of innocent people.

Yes I know Israel is providing aid, and I never said they were targeting women and kids. That is part of the reason I disagree with calling it genocide. They have targeted journalists though.

Because if his crime was serious enough to use explosives to get him, they never should have let him go with no charges in the first place

So what is your claim here? That it was Hamas doing the shooting?

Strawman alert! If I was “calling people I disagree with racist,” then I’d be calling a lot more people racist. In the GC, it’s probably only about 6 or 7ish people.

This is the quote you replied to with your rant about me being racist. Nothing racist here. But someone saying “hire dat nigga” most certainly is. I don’t “put race above all else.” But I call out racism when I see it, and I will continue to do so. Unfortunately it’s fairly common on here and in right wing social media.

What did I say that was racist?

What about a guy that was raised Christian?

@BrahmaBulls: Does Jamal's resume objective say Tryna get on wit a real gig ready to level up no cap? @5-Points: hire dat nigga! @EternalShinyAndChrome: @TimHauck is racist!! lol

Clearly, lol

Using explosives on their home after previously releasing the guy is evidence they might be in the wrong, IMO

Saying “many whites have more opportunities than minorities” (which of course, is true), is a far cry from saying those minorities “are not to blame for their shortcomings”

Allegedly

Ring camera captures border patrol using explosives, busting down door of a home with 1 and 6 year old children inside. They were looking for a man who was not home, accused of “ramming a border patrol vehicle,” who was questioned and released when the incident occurred https://ktla.com/news/local-news/mother-and-young-kids-inside-during-explosive-huntington-park-raid-suspect-not-home/ https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/huntington-park-border-patrol-agents-door-explosion/3734095/

Wait, people actually believe border crossings are at zero?

@RLLD must still think it’s the worst economy of the lower classes’ lifetime

Bump

It is, but I think the politically correct word is “networking”

Sure I guess that’s theoretically possible. “Likely” though, absolutely not. 1) He has a family. So either whoever helps him go into hiding will need to help his family go into hiding also, or he’d need to leave his family. 2) He’s extremely recognizable at this point. If he did go into hiding he could pretty much never show his face. And if he skipped out on his trial you know the administration would turn over every rock to find him

Someone hiring their buddy over the more qualified applicant, for example.

I agree. But I don’t think we’re quite there yet.

You SHOULDN’T need DEI, but while it’s much better than in the past, there are still a lot of racists out there. Like you, apparently

Overall, no, it’s not.

If the person is qualified, using DEI as “a basis to hire or advance anybody” is not racist. Again, the purpose of DEI is to give people a fair shot that may not have had one previously. But again, I know some companies took it too far. But it’s not surprising to me that a forum which contains multiple admitted racists (not saying you are one) thinks workplace discrimination against minorities doesn’t happen…

Yes, I believe he’d pick a lesser qualified white person over a more qualified black person. And I bet he’d admit it TBH. He’d probably rationalize it by saying some nonsense like he’d be afraid the black person would steal money or his girlfriend from him.