TimHauck

Yes I did.

Elon says the driver needs to be attentive. Not sure what happens if it senses you’re not, I guess it stops?

I like how he was mad that he claimed twitter overstated the number of bots and now, after he’s had plenty of time to get rid of them, he’s claiming that too many bots are why he’s recommending people only allow verified users to reply lol

He allegedly wrote that in notepad on his phone or something. I think the question is why wouldn’t he put that message more out in the open which is a fair question to ask. I think the answer is he was unfortunately just having a mental breakdown from PTSD + his wife leaving him. At first I thought maybe he wanted his body to be unrecognizable so that the attack would seem like the perpetrator was a Democrat to get people to “fight to get the Dems out of the fed government,” but that wouldn’t explain having his military ID on him.

Musk blocked searches for the full names of perpetrators of multiple recent mass shootings and terror attacks

If that letter is real, he likely chose the CyberTruck at least in part due to the Musk/Trump connection. Being able to contain the bomb could certainly have been a factor as well.

Looks like Adrian Dittman is in fact a real person

Musk encouraging users to only allow verified users to respond to their posts. Free speech baby

I had never listened to Ryan before but he didn’t seem too bad TBH, most of the questionable stuff was coming from Shoemate IMO. Main complaint about Ryan was he seemed to be pretty much be encouraging “civil war”

No as I said I listen to sources from all sides. I care more about the evidence being presented than who’s saying it, so 2 guys just speculating for an hour bores me. This guy has been one of the most outspoken I’ve seen that he thought this email was fake. Looks like he’s a hardcore righty that’s disappointed so many are believing it. One of the bigger red flags appears to be that his “first car” is not actually his first car. https://twitter.com/boneGPT/status/1875714104213856544 But I’m listening to the rest of the podcast now. Now Shoemate is talking about the anti-Trump Facebook posts from Livelsberger’s “wife.” Guess he forgot to check that they’ve been divorced for years and he had a new wife that just left him. Now he’s saying the New Orleans guy just had the ISIS flag because of “silliness.” Seems like Shoemate is bit of a whacko

And then you kept telling people to watch the video as if watching 2 guys speculating would suddenly change their minds (I watched about 1/3 of it then got bored).

Haven’t moved them. I said don’t act like things are facts when they aren’t. That statement was an example of you doing that. HTH

You said “apparently it’s true he didn’t want to harm anyone else.”

Yeah he’s a hypocrite too but that’s not what this thread is about. Stay on topic please

I literally just did. @TrailGuy claimed “the cyber truck had no bearing on the blast.” And you said “Yeah it did. Apparently it’s true he didn’t want to harm anyone.” I do not see the comment about being “on to good stuff” but here is the primary post from Kennedy. They competed on a reality show together 13 years ago and from the sounds of it haven’t spoken since. Also before he posted this he made a different post saying “does anyone know Matt Livelsberger”

I am skeptical of the other letter as well, considering he says the country has “strayed from family values,” days after his wife and mother of newborn son recently left him for cheating. But I guess that could just be typical MAGA dude hypocrisy.

You kinda did. Also, Tim Kennedy didn’t really know him. He was briefly on a reality show with him 13 years ago or something. A lot can change in 13 years. I would say just about the only things we know that are facts are that his wife recently left him, and that he was a conservative. Outside of that it’s mostly speculation.

No, just saying don’t act like something is fact when it isn’t. I’m still leaning towards the email discussed on Shawn Ryan’s podcast being fake. Adding some of my own analysis that I haven’t seen mentioned is I got a chuckle out of him saying “for vetting here’s my LinkedIn Profile.” Like why would a public LinkedIn profile be a way to vet someone that supposedly has super top secret information? Not to mention some other folks did call out that he listed the LinkedIn profile as Matthew when it’s actually Matt.

Nah I think the byes add to the strategy

You’re acting like it’s confirmed he chose the cyber truck because it would contain the blast, but it’s not (although it would make sense). A cybertruck was not mentioned in either of the alleged documents.

Your last paragraph is just them speculating, the “email” doesn’t even mention a cybertruck

No, but weird that for him it only became good now that he’s an ally of the guy that will be President in a couple weeks. He constantly brags about how X is “the best source of news” (which again, I’d agree with). But often times the news is negative, so it shouldn’t be suppressed. As I’ve said, as the owner he can do what he wants. And it’s still a great site. But this is just more hypocrisy from him.

You don’t find the timing odd?

Fair enough, but that seems like semantics. In addition, inconsequential details like the first car he owned potentially being wrong would if that’s the case suggest that the entire thing was fabricated.