TimHauck

You said I made it into a slap fight. You don’t think @Tree of Knowledge’s post was trolling for a slap fight?

Well someone beat him up, but I’m not convinced the he was saving a damsel in distress story is accurate. Is there a police report anywhere?

Lol you’re doing it again. I didn’t make it a political slap fight, @Tree of Knowledge did. Your obvious bias is showing.

You have a habit of whining about people making things political. Just not when conservatives do it.

2 days ago you complained about me making a thread political. You only complain about people making things political if they don’t agree with you. Similar to @Meglamaniac

Hypocrite, as expected

Eagerly awaiting @listen2me 23 calling out @Tree of Knowledge for making it political

Gotta give Trump credit, these Epstein distractions are getting creative

I wasn’t trying to make them look good, I was saying why would they release that if they wanted people to think they were good. And I don’t believe anyone answered that question.

I was one of the only ones that posted the image of the Israeli hostage digging his own grave actually. @supermike80 accused it of being fake news lol

Lots of lies in here Jerry. Generally I follow a few sources I trust, my favorite being Breaking Points (although yes they have some Israel haters on there), and they will often share other sources. But it’s not to “believe Hamas,” it’s to try to find out the truth. And again, the only journalists on the ground are Palestinians because that’s all Israel will allow. Which is awfully convenient since they can just say they’re not trustworthy, or just kill them and say they were Hamas. And again, I’ve acknowledged that some of the journalists killed probably were Hamas, but the chances they all were (even just the ones Israel admits to targeting) is pretty miniscule and you know it. Let’s not rehash old arguments and stick to current events. Anas Al-Sharif. He might be the most prominent journalist killed thus far, and the one the western media is talking about the most (but not as much as you would think if they were really “Hamas-friendly,” or frankly as much I think they should considering a fellow journalist was assassinated). Israel claims he was a Hamas operative “pretending to be a journalist.” But you don’t get 550k+ followers on x (200k more than the Free Press which you’ve cited recently and apparently is being bought for $250 million) or 1.7 million on Instagram by pretending. Even if you don’t want to admit that it’s unlikely he was Hamas, you do realize there is an obvious motive for Israel to kill someone with a large following that is sharing images and stories of what’s happening, right?

*suspended for allegedly faking data, a week after filing a complaint against someone else

Yes, for allegedly faking data

Allegedly. That also occurred 1 week after the since-suspended commander filed a complaint against someone else.

The comment about the Israeli murdering the Palestinian on video was not specific to the conversation about war crimes. But it was to point out that the overall oppression of many Palestinians (especially in the West Bank) is in fact systemic. I have doubted the numbers that came from Hamas. One example below. Bonus, the x account referenced here is the one you shared a post from previously. So again, be careful accusing others of believing propaganda when you’ve posted information from a propagandist. I don’t enjoy pointing out that Israel has done bad things (even though yes, Hamas is worse). In fact I hate it, and I wish it would stop because it gives REAL anti-semites like @Cdub100 ammo to trash Jews as a whole. But Israel does not represent all Jews, and there is nothing wrong with pointing out that Israel has done bad things, often systemically such as their continued targeting of journalists.

A moment? No. 9 minutes? Yes.

Brady Kiser was far more negligent than Alec Baldwin.

Yawn

Last week this life loser was bringing up 9 year old conversations, now he’s doubled it to 18

So is that a no to my question? Or do you agree that Alec Baldwin shooting someone with what he thought was a prop gun was a “tragic accident,” not a crime (at least on his part)?

Good summary

Weren’t you the guy that wanted Alec Baldwin convicted?

This is what happened. He claimed he could see outside from where he was inside.

The boy drowning wasn’t just an accident. It was negligence. The police agreed, but the prosecutor thought it’d be too hard to prove it. Your stance is not consistent, because Kourtney Kardashian quite literally holding her child is the opposite of what Brady Kiser was doing with the 3 year old.

Reminds me of when digby tried claiming over half of the murders in the world occurred in 7 US cities or something