TimHauck

I don’t follow CA…is it concerning for the state of the Dems that they think they need to gerrymander?

“It’s all so corrupt”

But he clearly said “it’s all so corrupt,” this can’t be argued. And if for some reason anyone was confused about his intent, he clarified it later.

The deflection here should be good.

Well Trump also spoke out against the bill. He says to just prosecute Pelosi, and only Pelosi, instead.

Yes, I would consider his post as “condemning” it. HTH.

I’m on my phone. To copy x links, I use the icon with the little arrow. On other sites that embeds them (and it used to here) so it’s kinda force of habit for me, but here sometimes it turns it to a black background for some reason.

This is kinda crazy. A list of all the people Loomer was likely involved with getting fired or not confirmed in the admin. https://www.news10.com/health/ap-health/ap-another-trump-administration-figure-who-met-laura-loomers-ire-is-out-a-look-at-her-influence/ I posted in a different thread, but the latest victim was the top vaccine official at the FDA, Vinay Prasad, a straight shooter that stands up to big pharma. This is a big loss IMO. It’s insane that this nutjob has so much sway within the administration. Reminder that she falsely insinuated that BOTH the Michigan stabber and NYC were Muslims. And unlike CNN who simply said a “possible” description, Loomer included commentary about “Muslim invaders destroying our country” and said to “deport them all.”

He literally just condemned California…

Here is the bill. What part is the “liberal fluff BS”? https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Committee-Passed-Member-Trading-Ban-Bill-Text.pdf

It’s an x post. I haven’t changed how I’ve copied the links, they used to embed and they don’t anymore. I’ve tried a couple of the methods others have suggested to get them to embed and they hadn’t worked for me last time I tried them. Here it is without the black background - https://x.com/SocDoneLeft/status/1950703671873835496

Kars 4 Kids is a scam that mostly just supports Hasidic Jewish Children going to summer camp.

I probably shouldn’t have mentioned Nancy. I’m sure most here will deflect to just talk about her and how she already made her money. Rick Scott: “anybody want to be poor? I don’t.” https://x.com/HouseMajPAC/status/1950631322029801508

https://x.com/SocDoneLeft/status/1950703671873835496

Twitter was a private company that could do what it wanted. What does that have to do with Stephen Colbert? Do you think Trump got him cancelled?

Looks like it had already been rising prior to the ad, and some of the rise was also attributed to the announcement of her being in an ad but not knowing what the ad actually was. Looks like the price has since come down from its recent peak in the last couple days. https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2025/07/24/sydney-sweeney-american-eagle-meme-stock.html

Why is my post ironic? I actually agree with @Horseman, if you’re going to talk trash on someone, you should quote or tag them so they’re more likely to see it. But not all of my tags are to talk trash, to you and Strike for example I’m typically looking for an answer to a question, or maybe responding to a prior point you made. Do you not find it ironic that @Horseman whined about someone not quoting him while talking trash about him, but then did the same exact thing he complained about, in the same thread even?

We did it guys! We proved that the Geek Club can turn literally any thread into a political b1tch fest

This thread was a wild ride for @Horseman. First yet another example of him falling for fake news (or maybe it was just his own racist assumption), but he of course refused to admit to being wrong. Then this may have been what you were thinking of @Fnord where he got mad at you for not quoting him (not necessarily tagging him I guess). Then he did the same thing he previously whined about by talking trash on people without quoting them. Again, in a thread where he was completely wrong. Lololol

I honestly didn’t even know that happened. But that’s ironic since I know @Horseman has talked trash on me in threads I wasn’t even posting in without tagging me. But we already knew he’s a hypocrite, so that’s not a surprise.

I actually think that bar shooting incident where the guy was killed after not even being in a fight is further evidence of something I (and I believe @The Real timschochet) have stated in the past. A big reason many (but not all) of the white on black crime stories get national attention is because it often starts out with the perpetrator not being charged, and the outrage is over wanting them charged (Ahmaud Arbery for example). But if charges are filed pretty quickly then most of the time the outrage is far less, or none like in this case.

C’mon, that wasn’t “handing me a win.” He was still arguing, and told me to “take the day off from searching for wins,” when I was simply answering a specific request he made of me. I am curious of his answer to my last question there though.

Wow, so much wrong here. 1) My original request wasn’t for a “mob,” you added that qualifier. As my point was I couldn’t really think of ANY recent instances where a white person simply beat up a black person and it made national news. So yeah, still waiting. So far the closest is a fake story a celebrity made up 6 years ago. 2) Part of the reason I asked for simply a fight with no critical injuries was because I figured if the person died then it was more likely to actually make national news. Yet the murder story I posted didn’t, despite being a cold-blooded white on black murder by a racist. Remember when posters here said America has solved racism against blacks? 3) Please tell me you’re not suggesting not paying a bar tab (which likely isn’t even true), justifies being beaten up by a mob?

Your taxpayer dollars are funding them though.