TimHauck

Step 3. It’s happening and it’s a good thing

Gerrymandering is kinda the opposite of democracy though

So why would you say “These minorities that you think are your friends would off you in a second if they could.” ?

You said perhaps they are popular in the culture, and that since they are popular in the culture they might serve them to imprisoned terrorists. Lol. You lose

Of course black people can be racist. I was laughing at his implication that every black person wants to kill white people.

Uh, did the Black Panther Party kill 6 million people?

I’m not even sure what you’re arguing. Are you playing semantics about the type of drink or something? What you just quoted was the entire premise of my argument, no goalpost moving - if you think it was reasonable to believe Abrego Garcia may have been served an alcoholic drink while imprisoned, you’re an idiot.

So you were saying it was reasonable to think Abrego Garcia might actually have been served an alcoholic drink, correct?

Lol

Says the guy who whined about me assuming your position about Vance Boelter, when I was right lol

Jerry, here is what started this conversation. My question was clearly specific to Abrego Garcia (duh), yet you replied talking about things that might be “customary” in El Salvador. There’s no other interpretation of this post other than that you were using this to form your opinion that you thought Occam’s razor wouldn’t tell you that it is highly unlikely (at best) that an imprisoned terrorist would be served a margarita.

The IDF’s “evidence” that Anas Al-Sharif was Hamas is an Excel document, lol (check the “military details” column for the rows above and below him)

Yawn

Did you read the article you just linked? It’s talking about how this is manufactured outrage from the right, lol

Check yes or no

I guess you didn’t ask it then

I know you’ve asked ChatGPT some stuff recently. You should ask it if it thinks hyperboles are true

Add to the list: “hyperboles are true”

Because the “conversation” I’m referring to included me bumping the question a couple times over a period of months. She was very clearly referring at least in part to her specific interaction with me

Well I can guarantee you my conversation with her (if you want to call it that, she never responded) is why she put me on ignore since she couldn’t handle being proven wrong. Same thing @BrahmaBulls did

Step 2. It’s not widespread

Do you think hyperboles are true? check yes or no

And I admitted it was stupid. Which @TBayXXXVII won’t do here.

Can always count on peefoam to quote me so the people “ignoring” me can see it. Thanks buddy!

Hey you at least admitted you were wrong in one of our convos, which is more than several of these idiots can say.