TimHauck

The comment about the Israeli murdering the Palestinian on video was not specific to the conversation about war crimes. But it was to point out that the overall oppression of many Palestinians (especially in the West Bank) is in fact systemic. I have doubted the numbers that came from Hamas. One example below. Bonus, the x account referenced here is the one you shared a post from previously. So again, be careful accusing others of believing propaganda when you’ve posted information from a propagandist. I don’t enjoy pointing out that Israel has done bad things (even though yes, Hamas is worse). In fact I hate it, and I wish it would stop because it gives REAL anti-semites like @Cdub100 ammo to trash Jews as a whole. But Israel does not represent all Jews, and there is nothing wrong with pointing out that Israel has done bad things, often systemically such as their continued targeting of journalists.

A moment? No. 9 minutes? Yes.

Brady Kiser was far more negligent than Alec Baldwin.

Yawn

Last week this life loser was bringing up 9 year old conversations, now he’s doubled it to 18

So is that a no to my question? Or do you agree that Alec Baldwin shooting someone with what he thought was a prop gun was a “tragic accident,” not a crime (at least on his part)?

Good summary

Weren’t you the guy that wanted Alec Baldwin convicted?

This is what happened. He claimed he could see outside from where he was inside.

The boy drowning wasn’t just an accident. It was negligence. The police agreed, but the prosecutor thought it’d be too hard to prove it. Your stance is not consistent, because Kourtney Kardashian quite literally holding her child is the opposite of what Brady Kiser was doing with the 3 year old.

Reminds me of when digby tried claiming over half of the murders in the world occurred in 7 US cities or something

What are the odds a kid on a boat that’s being held by his mom falls in the water? Do you agree it’s exponentially less than the odds a kid in a backyard by himself falls in an uncovered pool?

I’d give her a better chance than a guy that’s not even paying attention

Because she was holding her kid on a boat without a life jacket on? Lol. That’s literally the complete opposite of what happened here where the Dad was flat out ignoring his kid.

She was not home, Dad was watching the kids. This guy isn’t helping Dads show they can take care of kids when mom isn’t around.

Can you tell me why you brought Kourtney Kardashian into this conversation?

I don’t know the specific laws, but I would say simply leaving your kid outside unattended with an uncovered pool while you’re inside should not itself be a crime. But if the kid dies, yeah, that’s a problem. I don’t follow Kourtney Kardashian, did her kid die due to her neglect? Doing a quick search I see some people complaining that she was holding a kid on a boat that didn’t have a life jacket on. Please tell me you don’t think that is at all comparable to this.

Calling someone stupid and a liar is not worse than calling them a retard, pedo and “fagot.” HTH

That’s fine. Again I think the biggest thing about the bet is that the timestamps prove the negligence. And as Gutter said the guy lied about it. IIRC he initially claimed he was simply “connecting with the newborn baby”

I’ve seen some people use that detail to argue to get rid of mobile sports betting, which is stupid. But IMO placing the bet (and watching the game that he bet on) is more than just being distracted. He also admitted to allowing the 3 year old play outside while he wasn’t out there, despite the uncovered pool (which they apparently had a net for but didn’t have in use). If a normal person had to go take a dump they would bring the kid inside first (or at least put the cover on the pool).

Too bad he won’t

Oh no, he called someone stupid and a liar! -says the guy constantly calling people pedos, retards, and “fagots”

Yikes, @BrahmaBulls is both triggered and obsessed, not a good combo.

Palestinian filmmaker in the West Bank (reminder: where Hamas is not in control) that worked on an Oscar-winning film, films his own murder by an Israeli settler who had been previously sanctioned by the US (sanctions were removed by Trump). The murderer was initially released on house arrest, then released from house arrest because he told the judge he didn’t do it. Israel wouldn’t even give the family the dead body back until after dozens of women from his village went on a hunger strike. This isn’t just a rogue crazy dude, he’s being enabled by a corrupt system. Strike and Jerry, it may take a little longer, but I think one day you will realize you were on the wrong side of history. (X posts from an Israeli journalist. There was even a little US coverage about the initial arrest, so maybe we’ll see more on it from them, especially since they can blame OMB for it).

Jerry has been posting a bunch from the Free Press recently. Tim Dillon really bashing their valuation and unwavering support for Israel here: