TimHauck

You said the Supreme Court didn’t disagree with you. Survey says, they do.

2001 case of Zadvydas vs Davis Despite the government’s broad power over immigration, the Supreme Court has recognized that aliens who have physically entered the United States generally come under the protective scope of the Due Process Clause, which applies to all ‘persons’ within the United States, including aliens, whether their presence here is lawful, unlawful, temporary, or permanent.1 https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt5-6-2-3/ALDE_00013726/#ALDF_00028415 But seriously @Meglamaniac, I appreciate you actually commenting about the topic of the thread. Sorry to have to prove you wrong though.

That was the link he posted to prove that porn was allowed on twitter. I was wrong in thinking it wasn’t, but the thread was about the “Twitter files” when it came out that a lot of what was censored at the direction of the government was Hunter Biden d1ck pics, which @Horseman was trying to argue should have been allowed on Twitter but that is obviously incorrect.

So we’ve got almost a whole page of posts from like 4 different people talking to each other about how they “ignore” me. I’m not sure you guys know the definition of “ignore”…

No but @Horseman and @EternalShinyAndChrome are. You weren’t here at the time but @Horseman’s go-to porn website is “gaywebcam.com”. NTTAWWT of course.

Did you see me prove you wrong about the court order that you claimed meant he couldn’t be deported?

Good to know a bunch of the righties just want this place to be a circle jerk.

I literally just said I think it was more of a cruel and unusual punishment issue than a due process issue. But I also think arguing about it is semantics, I can see the argument for why one would say it’s a due process issue.

Well first of all you need to acknowledge that it was more than just “a mistake.” It started as a mistake, but became intentional when the admin made comments like “he’s never coming back” and refused to try to bring him back until the Supreme Court intervened. Arguing whether him being sent to El Salvador was a due process issue feels like semantics as long as we can all agree that he shouldn’t have been sent there. And looks like @squistion agrees that he had due process prior to that.

What about before he was sent to El Salvador? If you’re just talking about him being sent to a terrorist prison in El Salvador, I agree. Although I kinda feel like that’s not necessarily a matter of due process and moreso cruel and unusual punishment.

Anyone present in this country except for diplomats, are under the jurisdiction of the United States.

The Supreme Court disagrees with you, is that better?

Also, weird that you don’t care about posters saying people don’t have a right to due process. That seems like a pretty big deal IMO. But hey, at least @Meglamaniac is finally providing some actual thoughts to a thread. Too bad they’re terrible.

I ignore a lot of @RLLD’s ramblings as well as the people that fall into his word salad traps, was @squistion talking about Abrego Garcia specifically? I thought most of his recent comments were speaking generally.

@Horseman still mad I bumped a few of the numerous times he fell for fake news, lol

I literally just said Abrego Garcia had due process. Do you agree with these idiots saying illegals don’t have a right to due process?

Wrong.

The constitution disagrees with you. Unless the person admits it, you need some form of due process to accurately determine that they’re actually illegal, otherwise the government could just declare whoever they want is illegal then say they don’t get due process. (Abrego Garcia had previously had due process. But entering the country illegally does not mean you should be put in a terrorist prison).

In this court document, the judge reiterates that the government has made “poor attempts to tie Abrego Garcia to MS-13.” Also agrees with me that Abrego Garcia is a “low risk of non-appearance.” https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.tnmd.104622/gov.uscourts.tnmd.104622.95.0_1.pdf

Lol

And West Virginia is poor because of Democrats?

I’m going to take @Strike’s non-response here as a yes to my last question.

Shoot you’re right, I should have predicted “yawn,” not “OK”

Like West Virginians?

More evidence for @Meglamaniac that you’re not a serious poster. In b4 @Meglamaniac says “OK”