TimHauck

Reuters!! I remember when you said a Reuters camera was Hamas, lol

So you’re just wasting our time with semantics arguments, got it.

So to be clear, do you acknowledge that Trump: “threatened to take military action against Nigeria unless they stopped the Christian genocide” but you’re just saying this particular article doesn’t show where he said that? Because Trump of course did say this: “If the Nigerian Government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the U.S.A. will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria, and may very well go into that now disgraced country, ‘guns-a-blazing,’ to completely wipe out the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities. I am hereby instructing our Department of War to prepare for possible action. If we attack, it will be fast, vicious, and sweet, just like the terrorist thugs attack our CHERISHED Christians! WARNING: THE NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT BETTER MOVE FAST!” Or is this more semantics and you’re going to say “well that was only a threat against the terrorists and not the country”?

So you agree it’s not about stopping “Christian genocide”?

So you reported him?

Well like most discussions, there’s nuance here. I think there is enough evidence that the government can claim US action in general in Nigeria is “about terrorism,” however as @nobody and the anonymous “official” pointed out, this particular strike didn’t seem to actually do anything. And Nigeria specifically denies that the terrorism in question is targeting Christians. Your argument here feels like semantics to me Jerry. You appear to be focused on the headline that “Nigeria averts unilateral U.S. action by cooperating on airstrike“ But the very first sentence says “By publicly cooperating with the United States on a Christmas Day airstrike, Nigeria's government may have averted humiliating unilateral military action threatened a month ago by President Donald Trump.“ Would you feel it wasn’t a “leftie conclusion” if “may have” was also included in the headline and not just the body of the article? The main “opinion” I see in the article is the very last sentence talking about pandering to evangelicals, which Gutter did not include in his quote. The stuff that he bolded seems like things that can be proven did happen, but it appears you just take issue with the implication that one thing happened because of the other? I would say the article doesn’t necessarily “prove” that Trump “threatened to take military action against Nigeria unless they stopped the Christian genocide” But it does “support” it

Has anyone found out the remaining names on the list of 10 possible co-conspirators?

To clarify, what exactly are you saying is their “leftie conclusion”?

It’s about oil.

That’s cool that you’re guessing, but you keep saying “Christian genocide” when Nigeria “strongly denies” that: While Nigeria has had persistent security challenges, including violence and kidnappings by Islamist insurgents in the north, it strongly denies that Christians are subjected to systematic persecution.

Yes, prices plateauing would probably be best case scenario for Trump

Righties, including DHS, mad that Abrego Garcia made a TikTok. And IANAL but seems like this tweet might violate this supposed gag order.

Not enough to have any impact on home prices

I kinda agree here, people hoping for house prices to come down need to be careful what they wish for, if the housing market tanks much of the economy will tank with it. Of course I wouldn’t be so confident that prices will keep going up. But not because of mass deportations

Confirms what you said lolololol, lying Troubador lies again.

Yea, when he said “it was in today’s paper” we all knew he only reads one paper. But was curious if he would share a link for the first time in his posting career, but obviously not since it would have shown him to be a liar. In doing a brief search, it seems what many think is the biggest factor was something called the “Literacy Based Promotion Act” which was passed in 2013. https://www.mississippifirst.org/literacy-series-part-1/

Yes, “Krassenstein!” And this popped up on my feed on Christmas. But this is pretty hilarious Merry Christmas!

Here is same dude apparently just out here making up quotes from Hamas. In b4 Jerry says something dumb like “yeah but they probably would say that, stop defending Hamas you Jew-hater!”

Sad. 3200 jobs gone in a town of 11000 will basically kill the whole town. Some have argued this is actually illegal because they’re not trying to sell it to.a different company - https://kgfw.com/2025/12/09/the-impact-is-real-and-devastating-dan-osborn-criticizes-tysons-decision-to-close-lexington-facility/#

As your gay lover (NTTAWWT) would say:

He’s an American citizen that was living in the West Bank. You’re not trying to suggest he’s Hamas are you? If they had any evidence at all that he was Hamas he would not have been released, really the only reason he was was because he’s an American citizen and as a result there was pressure on/from government officials. Here’s some more detail on his story, I haven’t seen if the Free Press has come out with a response saying it never happened yet. https://www.infinitejaz.com/p/mohammed-ibrahims-stolen-year He says one of his cellmates died while imprisoned, who also was never charged. So yeah in this particular case they were treated as badly as Hamas’s prisoners. Stop saying I hate “my own people,” you’re the one being anti-Semitic by conflating the IDF with all Jews. The IDF aren’t my people, even though they’re still not as bad as Hamas. But we need to stop paying for their war crimes with American taxpayer dollars.

They never even charged him, dummy. Even if he did throw a rock, you’re okay with 9 months in jail for that? lol. Especially compared to 5 days house arrest for the “rogue” (lol) IDF reservist for literally running someone over.

Provide a link to the article and prove me wrong then, liar.

German journalist that was a Flotilla participant accuses IDF of raping her.

no that actually wasn’t the main reason cited, liar.