TimHauck

Then I probably wouldn’t consider that as shooting “towards” the crowd

Ok, and if they fired warning shots towards the crowd, isn’t it likely that they probably hit someone?

I’m betting he is @Walker

Better watch out, looks like digby is back and he’s the biggest reporter here, there are often others that get caught up in his reporting sprees

Yup, stupid thing to say. Funny how righties here don’t care when people on x with hundreds of thousands of followers say vile sh1t, but all of the sudden care when some random pediatrician does.

Haven’t followed this at all but I listen to Breaking Points and they interviewed Turtleboy as well

He does seem unnecessarily angry overall. He was correct about his original post to Gaines though. Being critical of the Israeli government isn’t antisemitism

Sounds kinda like digby.

So you admit calling him gay was a slight. That means she thinks being gay is a negative thing. Not rocket science.

Thanks for admitting that she used saying he was “more likely” gay as a “slight.”

So in a post that was meant as an insult to “piss him off,” in which she called him “obsessed,” “unhealthy,” and “would be more likely to have a boyfriend than a girlfriend,” just that last one wasn’t a slight. Lol

Thanks for agreeing she was implying he was gay to “piss him off”

She is. But if she can call someone else one for engagement she will (and has done so)

If Olbermann said she probably has a girlfriend she would’ve already been on 2 Fox News segments claiming he’s a homophobe.

So saying “it’s more likely you have a boyfriend than a girlfriend” like a 10 year old would say doesn’t have anything to do with gay people. That’s certainly a take.

If you can’t admit that Riley was using an implication that Olbermann is gay as an insult, you’re the clown.

Let’s start slowly. Do you agree that Riley’s post as a whole was an insult to Olbermann?

Lol

This recent conversation isn’t very complicated. Riley Gaines was insulting Olbermann. In doing so, she was implying he was gay as part of that insult. The end.

Bump for @jerryskids

I know you will claim I’m arguing semantics but I think your commentary mischaracterizes her comments a bit. Your comment: the trans movement is largely a social contagion Her quote: The rates of trans children have exploded and much of this almost certainly social contagion Seems to me she is only talking about the “increase” in the number of trans folks, but it sounds like you’re talking about trans folks in total. Can you clarify? Do you think kids being trans as a whole is a “social contagion”?

So Wu wants to change the conversation, but you don’t. Got it!

Any “influencer” that got one of those binders should probably retire from social media.

No. It was relevant to the sentence I quoted, which Wu wants to “change the conversation to.” I had never heard of Wu before today, but she is described by you as “influential in the trans community.” And she has had multiple posts showing her disdain for Gaines, who is probably one of the most well-known people that is “dehumanizing to trans people.”

Somehow still gonna be the Dems’ fault