TimHauck

So in a post that was meant as an insult to “piss him off,” in which she called him “obsessed,” “unhealthy,” and “would be more likely to have a boyfriend than a girlfriend,” just that last one wasn’t a slight. Lol

Thanks for agreeing she was implying he was gay to “piss him off”

She is. But if she can call someone else one for engagement she will (and has done so)

If Olbermann said she probably has a girlfriend she would’ve already been on 2 Fox News segments claiming he’s a homophobe.

So saying “it’s more likely you have a boyfriend than a girlfriend” like a 10 year old would say doesn’t have anything to do with gay people. That’s certainly a take.

If you can’t admit that Riley was using an implication that Olbermann is gay as an insult, you’re the clown.

Let’s start slowly. Do you agree that Riley’s post as a whole was an insult to Olbermann?

Lol

This recent conversation isn’t very complicated. Riley Gaines was insulting Olbermann. In doing so, she was implying he was gay as part of that insult. The end.

Bump for @jerryskids

I know you will claim I’m arguing semantics but I think your commentary mischaracterizes her comments a bit. Your comment: the trans movement is largely a social contagion Her quote: The rates of trans children have exploded and much of this almost certainly social contagion Seems to me she is only talking about the “increase” in the number of trans folks, but it sounds like you’re talking about trans folks in total. Can you clarify? Do you think kids being trans as a whole is a “social contagion”?

So Wu wants to change the conversation, but you don’t. Got it!

Any “influencer” that got one of those binders should probably retire from social media.

No. It was relevant to the sentence I quoted, which Wu wants to “change the conversation to.” I had never heard of Wu before today, but she is described by you as “influential in the trans community.” And she has had multiple posts showing her disdain for Gaines, who is probably one of the most well-known people that is “dehumanizing to trans people.”

Somehow still gonna be the Dems’ fault

This dude is definitely a scammer, he definitely makes sure to say “from the world’s highest IQ record holder” as much as possible. And he apparently doesn’t know what a paragraph is https://x.com/yhbryankimiq/status/1941706014572806568 https://x.com/yhbryankimiq/status/1941891480186196306

People on x these days love being anti-Semitic apparently (and I’m not talking about being critical of the Israeli government). The guy he kicked out of the bar is apparently doubling down on being anti-Semitic trying to get those Elon-bucks https://x.com/MoKhan_3/status/1939825081938518524

So all trans folks are disgusting and violent?

Yeah Helene as a whole was exponentially worse. I’ve seen some people say how the emergency personnel in Texas are doing so much better than Helene which is silly. Obviously the deaths are tragic especially with many of them being kids. But looks it’s from one river pretty much in one fairly small area, which is a little easier for the emergency personnel than Helene’s damage which was caused by probably dozens of bodies of water and spread out over hundreds of miles, in the focking mountains. It’s really a miracle there weren’t more deaths.

Speaking of that sentence, for the people that claim Riley Gaines “just wants men out of women’s sports,” here is Wu’s opinion of Ms Gaines: https://x.com/BriannaWu/status/1817169816626553245 I appreciate the increasing frequency of these comments from Riley because it gives away her game. Yes, it’s reasonable to have a public policy discussion about trans people and women’s sports. But her political project doesn’t stop there. She’s disgusted by LGBT people and wants to eliminate them from public life. This is, of course, anti-American and anti-democratic.

No arguments here. I think this forum could particularly learn from this sentence: Then we could change the conversation to what it should actually be - why are people so dehumanizing and cruel to trans people?

There’s @BrahmaBulls “ignoring” me again, lol.

“Correctly,” lol

You drunk?

I thought we were trying to reduce the need for the legal system? Doing this “case by case” would be silly IMO. I think you have to make the kid a citizen if either parent is. Reading the EO that’s what it sounds Iike to me, but it’s a little lawyer-speaky