TimHauck

This is irrelevant to the crime victimization survey which I linked the update for (and was the basis for the data in the OP, even though the OP did not cite his source)

Send him back. He’s been here since at least 2020 btw

So you’re an illegal immigrant?

@squistion @thegeneral @The Real timschochet @Hawkeye21 @nobody @jerryskids @Strike am I interpreting this correctly?

Wrong on both counts. I was the one that cited your source for you because you’re a coward, and I also pointed out how you were trying to mislead with it. For one, the metric you cited declined in 2021 vs 2020. You also focused on one specific metric when really most of them were comparable to 2018. Oh and by the way the new report is out. I’ll be eagerly awaiting your next thread talking about how violent crime (as you defined it) is down 11%, and just about flat to 2018. https://bjs.ojp.gov/document/cv23.pdf Better luck next time. Maybe you should go falsely accuse some more mayors of taking advantage of Haitians.

Burrow, Brian Robinson and Kincaid to score less than 35.

Ok so somewhere in between my 2 scenarios, probably a gray area. But thanks for confirming you didn’t know whether or not the people in the waiting area had insurance or not.

I’m no lawyer but if he said “all” or even “most” I bet that would qualify

lol I didn’t realize this thread was started by @jonnyutah. Dude loves citing misleading stats apparently. Although at least when he’s done it more recently he’s cited his source, which he did not do here.

How does it not? If the doctor said something like “I see a lot of patients that are undocumented and don’t have health insurance,” that wouldn’t be a violation. But pretty confident if he was specifically referring to people in the waiting area that would be.

What’s his or her name? I’d like to report him/her for violating HIPAA

Loomer also getting in on the “ABC whistleblower” “story”. Unless this person was a janitor or something, you’d think they’d know how to form a sentence

Did you check all of their insurance information?

Oh so you don’t want the story of why Routh wanted to assassinate Trump? They have the guy in custody and we already know he wanted to assassinate Trump, it’s not like he’s going to be paying out on his promise.

Secret service will pay it, duh

Conservatives: why won’t they release the tranny manifesto!?!??!? Also conservatives: why are they releasing the Ryan Routh manifesto?!?!?!!?

Hey @jonnyutah, here’s a guy that probably does need to be investigated, not the mayor. Apparently the CEO of a staffing agency dependent on Haitians, and owns 40+ rentals under the name “Ten Enterprises”: https://jewishjournal.com/commentary/opinion/375011/feds-and-state-ag-investigate-an-alleged-human-trafficking-empire-run-in-springfield-ohio/

You forgot to talk about glory holes

Found a couple other articles below https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13676429/poll-Democrats-Trump-assassin-kill-target.html https://unherd.com/newsroom/third-of-democrats-wish-donald-trump-had-been-killed/ Not sure what this means: “I used a concealed technique called a list experiment which found that even when they could disguise their true sentiment, a solid seven in 10 Democrats were pleased the assassin missed.“ Looking at the graphic in the Daily Mail article, is it saying the question he really asked is whether they agree with the statement “White Republicans are racist”?

Looked good today.

Generally speaking, no I would not say the person messing around with a married man or woman has a higher moral standing. Just don’t think I’d call that person a “cheater.” But when the person you’re “messing around” with has been separated from their spouse for over a decade, that person’s not really cheating either. Edit: you can probably argue that Kamala “slept her way” to a position, but you can’t argue she’s a homewrecker unless there’s a different relationship than Brown that is being referred to.

Correct. But just stating facts.