TimHauck

Lol, quite the backtrack here.

He’s actually done it for parts of 3 different weeks. Previous video was 6/5 (week of 6/2) Here is a post from him doing it on 6/12 (week of 6/9): https://x.com/bradlander/status/1933303575188328894 Then today (week of 6/16)

It’s more than 1 week. He wanted publicity to show he was standing up for due process. I don’t think he wanted to be arrested. Edit: And yes @BrahmaBulls, he was arrested, according to DHS https://x.com/DHSgov/status/1935040871717916825

@Engorgeous George, based on the available video do you think Lander committed assault as the DHS x account has now claimed (edit: despite there being no actual charges) ?

This video is from June 5, 12 days ago (AKA nearly 2 weeks)

@nobody, he’s really committing to the bit I guess!

I mean I’m not sure how believing someone was born via divine intervention and later rose from the dead doesn’t conflict with science, but OK. (maybe his birth story would be a better analogy to the trans debate because biology).

Yeah I’d believe this, thank you. But many seem to think the majority of the crowd was paid and/or bussed in.

Ha, this sounds interesting. Let us know how it is

$$$

And that some dude rose from the dead and that there’s an almighty being that has been alive for thousands of years

Is the existence of God consistent with what we know about science? I’m pointing out that it’s inconsistent to think trans folks are fake “because science” but to simultaneously believe in God.

@jerryskids, was also thinking of our conversation with the second paragraph

So asking is justified? Wouldn’t it likely be true then that if they provided it to him when asked that there would have been no viral moment? I’ll defer to your legal expertise if you think there was legitimate grounds to detain him, but I’m not convinced he was only seeking a viral moment

That has nothing to do with what I just said, but yes I do think she’s a bigot, not because “she doesn’t say things the way I think she should,” because her words have shown she doesn’t like trans folks in general, not just the trans folks that play in womens sports. And honestly, as I think about it more, no I truly don’t think her negative comments about trans folks in situations that have nothing to do with sports actually help her argument. Because if her ultimate goal is for all states to pass legislation to ban biological males in women’s sports, the people she should be targeting with her messaging are the Dem politicians (as most regular folk already agree with her). And to do that, she should focus on facts and data, not just inflammatory rage bait. As I said earlier, most of what she’s doing now is just riling up the people that already agree with her. It has helped her get rich though, which I think was her bigger objective.

Correct. I don’t think she makes hateful posts about trans folks unrelated to sports just to back up her point about sports. I’m sure she thinks it helps that argument, but I don’t think it’s the primary reason she does it.

Can’t be as bad as HT on me. I’ve maybe responded to him once in the last year and he’s still begging for my attention.

Did they show it at all in this case?

She’s saying they’re men, that being trans is not a real thing. This was the other example I shared earlier. She called being trans a “gimmick.” https://x.com/Riley_Gaines_/status/1861564050024329515 @jerryskids tried arguing that since the post she was replying to was deleted, that it lacked the full context. But no context is needed to acknowledge that calling trans a gimmick means she’s against transgender people. Although to your question Jerry, reading the comments, it’s pretty clear the original post was about Walmart supposedly no longer selling chest binders (so not about sports). I’m guessing the post got deleted after many commenters pointed out that they were in fact still selling them. Riley makes lots of posts about trans folks but not about sports. For example she also retweets just about every story she sees of a trans person committing a crime.

I’m no lawyer Iike @Engorgeous George was, but I’d imagine they can say they already showed it in a situation like that. Did they already show it in this case? The implication from Lander here is they did not (except for the one guy holding a crumpled paper in the air), I imagine if the guy being disappeared had a lawyer he would have asked prior to Lander

I don’t care either, and I believe in God, but I can acknowledge that believing in God denies science.

https://x.com/Riley_Gaines_/status/1808256336922108415

What context?

Is it a fact that God is real? Just trying to determine when it’s okay to deny science and when it’s not.

Sharing evidence of Riley Gaines’s past tweets are facts. She is against trans people as a whole, not just in sports. Do you disagree?