TimHauck

Nope. I admit when I’m wrong. I wasn’t here. HTH

Well kudos to not just linking “c19ivm.org” or whatever, but if this is the best study you’ve got, thanks for proving there isn’t good evidence for it. Hospitalization was shorter in the placebo group. And a quote from the study: “Although the study sample was too small (n= 72) to draw any solid conclusions,“ But, the irony of you constantly calling Covid a cold and then citing a study where a primary endpoint is how long someone’s cough lasted is not lost on me.

It “appeared” TO HIM. That doesn’t mean it just “appeared” in general

You just moved them again. Or maybe more accurately, are making a strawman argument. The main argument isn’t that Garcia “is an awesome guy.” It’s that we should try to get him back. I never said the one judge’s decision “didn’t ’matter,” I said they didn’t really rule that he was MS-13. They basically just said there was a high enough chance he was to deny bail, which I’m fine with. And yet people like you continue to use that to make definitive statements that he’s a “gang banger.” Not sure of the dirty cop’s possible motivations. Based on his name he was Hispanic himself, maybe he didn’t like people coming here illegally making some people judge all Hispanics. Maybe he demanded money and Garcia didn’t have any. Maybe Garcia was his weed dealer but he didn’t have any that day for Mendez to get his fix. Maybe Garcia was focking the same prostitute he was. Lots of potential reasons, or maybe just a dirty cop being a dirty cop for no reason at all.

Nope. The first just said it “appeared trustworthy” in order to deny bond, and the second just said he didn’t prove he wasn’t a danger.

Actually he wasn’t.

Your back must hurt from the goalposts you just moved. I’ve never said he shouldn’t be deported (because he entered the country illegally). But the evidence of him being a gang member is flimsy at best, and I think people like JD Vance definitively stating that he is is wrong. Again, at best, one judge did that. All the current evidence suggests that the judges saw the same evidence we did, a report filed by a dirty cop based primarily on a claim from a criminal informant and pieces of clothing. Also, the “80” side of this is the one that respects the Supreme Court. There are even plenty of Republicans on that side as well. IIRC, didn’t even you say we should ask for him back?

At best, one. More like zero though

False.

Since they have apparently moved him out of CECOT, maybe we aren’t. Which is kinda weird that they did that since Bukele stated definitively he was a terrorist and I thought CECOT was supposed to be the terrorist prison. Serious question though, if we deport someone that has not been charged with a crime other than entering the US illegally, they’re not usually put in jail in their home country right? Thats one of the bigger issues here IMO

Believe all women! Send Hegseth to CECOT too amiright?

Stephen Miller and others have said it (so of course all the sheep repeated it without actually researching it), but it is a lie at worst, at best a gross misrepresentation. The original “ruling” was only to determine whether he could get bond. It didn’t “rule” that he was in MS-13, it just said that the accusation he was “appeared trustworthy” so he was denied bond. Then all the appeals court said was that he didn’t do a good enough job “proving he wasn’t a danger.”

Reminder: our current Secretary of defense has been accused of worse crimes than Abrego Garcia

Accidental lab leak most likely. Not intentional

The Supreme Court wants him returned too

Court, not courts

And so do wives of devoted husbands. We don’t really know which he is.

This is false. You can kinda say one court did, but really all it said was that the criminal informant who made that claim “appeared trustworthy.” The appeals court did NOT “find him to be a gang member,” it just said he didn’t provide enough evidence to “prove he wasn’t a danger.”

Seek help

He stated that it came from the CDC’s recommendation, but he didn’t know where exactly they got the number from. That doesn’t mean THEY made it up based on nothing.

You don’t know @Frozenbeernuts?

It was “based on” science. They just didn’t know if it was applicable to Covid.

That’s not even what the source you’re getting it from says

It is. But even the WH website (which is just making a guess based on existing information, not “confirmed”) says lab “leak,” not “created.” Very different.

No it’s not, sheep.