TimHauck

Yes as I said, they supported “the attack.” And as I said before Hamas was even brought into the discussion, “from the River to the Sea” implies there will need to be a war for “Palestine to be free,” so it’s not surprising that they’d support an attack on Israel. So I’d agree that anyone saying “from the River to the Sea” is supporting a war against Israel. What I was disputing was that the majority of them want to kill all Jews, especially those that don’t live in Israel. Question 7 looks like it’s more about them having to pick among the available options, and yes as I said they’d rather Hamas than the other currently available options. But figure 25 can’t be much more clear: “which of the following political parties do you support” and only 34% answered Hamas. There were also more specific questions about who they thought should be the individual leader and the guy with the most support was not Hamas (although he’s currently in jail for murder), with around 30%+ saying they wouldn’t even participate in the elections. Doesn’t sound like much “support” to me. Also worth noting that in the March poll, 62% supported a two state solution. By definition that doesn’t mean killing all the Jews in Israel. That number is up significantly vs the prior polls, but it was always 1/3+ (and I assume there were more than 2 answers given but it doesn’t show for that one).

Wasn’t there a poster here that said no gender surgery until 26 or something?

This is literally the poll that all of the MSM articles are referring to, dumbazz. It’s called a primary source, I know you don’t believe in those and just trust what you read from the MSM. Already addressed #2

I literally said they supported the attack. But you said “a majority support Hamas and their actions re: Israel.” That is two different claims. The first one is wrong, it’s okay you can admit it.

@Cdub100 I’m still confused how you concluded that my reply meant I wanted a “fatherless child and the mother living on welfare”?

A majority support “their actions” on October 7, and they prefer them over some of the other options, but a “strong” or “overwhelming” majority do not support Hamas as a whole. Interestingly, only 2% of those saying “Hamas did not commit atrocities on 10/7” actually saw any videos of it. While it is higher than Fateh, the polling says that only 34% support Hamas. And if elections were held today, over 1/3 would not participate. In fact, 62% said they would want a new government that is “not under the control of political parties” (Hamas is a political party). It may be beneficial for you to read primary sources and not just repeat the talking points from your masters. Particularly @Strike (who has a history here of believing lies from the media) and @jonnyutah who have once again been proven wrong; at least @Mark Davis’s comment left some room for interpretation. https://pcpsr.org/en/node/973

If God isn’t mentioned in the Bible, how do you know he is against divorce?

Are you specifying “Israeli” Jews here? Do you agree “from the River to the Sea” doesn’t mean death to all Jews, especially ones that don’t live in Israel?

Hamas wants to eradicate Jews. “Palestine” doesn’t.

Jews that don’t live in Israel, nothing. Of course some that do live in Israel would in that scenario (not saying I’m advocating for that), but not all. Did all the people die that were living in the places Russia has taken from Ukraine?

That’s not the part I was disputing. But if we’re now actually talking about something that is debatable, yes it does mean eradicate “the Jewish state.” The only way that would really happen would be through war, but that doesn’t mean that all Jews (especially ones that don’t live in Israel) need to die.

Huh? I’m saying the best chance for a kid of teen parents to not be focked for life is if the kid + both parents are living with one of its grandparents that can help support it.

It’s not though, he literally said it’s not. You’re making sh1t up, but what else is new.

Where did I do that? I posted a clip of one pedo Republican that did, and asked if we could all agree on it.

Or they could have the baby and not get married. Chances are if the baby is gonna have a chance at not being focked for life they’ll be living with one of the parents’ parents anyway.

Uh: .

So you’re still going with “Tim thinks death to America doesn’t actually mean death to America”?

Must not have been covered by Tucker

Liar. Go back to your RNC glory hole

He’s from Texas

So you can smear an entire party, but the “other side” can’t, got it. I actually understand that not everyone from the same party has all the same views. My comment was a sarcastic response to @Patented Phil making the same suggestion.

And yet Dem states are the ones banning child marriage. Maybe you should switch parties?

No you didn’t. Your implication seems to be that since some Dems support trans surgeries for minors that they would also support child marriage and thus being the opposite of them you don’t. Is that correct? If so, seems odd that most of the states banning it are democratic states

Lol no you didn’t

Notification? No. Approval? Yes