TimHauck

So kinda like many Republicans?

At least you admit it

Your privilege is showing

Fair enough

Bump. Thought of this thread after seeing this:

Here’s an example of what usually happens

True, the MAGA folks do do as their told

I don’t think they will be “targeted” per se, and overall I wouldn’t really disagree with @TBayXXXVII’s point that while the police may get frivolous complaints based on the law, hopefully the police themselves don’t act on it, but you never know, which is part of the reason why it’s probably better if the wording is updated. But really I’d think fielding calls from homophobes would not be a good use of taxpayer funds.

Even a lefty would probably admit marketing to such a small demographic had limited upside to begin with. But I think pretty much everyone was surprised at just how much downside it had…

https://www.newsmax.com/finance/streettalk/bud-light-marketing-chief-dylan-mulvaney/2023/11/16/id/1142571/ I’ll admit I was wrong here. I thought some of the initial numbers were taken out of context and did not think the impact would be this long-lasting. But Bud Light continues to report poor numbers and people that played a part continue to get fired. Congrats righties, you finally led a successful boycott and got your point across that you hate trannies.

Agree, but it is poorly worded and I could certainly see bigots that lack common sense and logic trying to report gay people for holding hands or something

It’s fine to bring up and it is part of the reason why additional boosters shouldn’t be recommended for young men. But claiming “Fauci finally admits it” is retarded.

I wouldn’t say there’s an overwhelmingly large number of studies that I “disagree” with, mostly just the small non-randomized and sometimes fraudulent ivermectin studies. Most of the time it’s more an issue of people misrepresenting what the study’s data actually says. Off the top of my head, some examples include the “Cleveland clinic study” which people have incorrectly claimed proves “more shots, more infections;” and the Christine Stabell Benn study which I’ve discussed with @jerryskids that people have used to incorrectly claim the mRNA vaxxes are causing a significant number of cardiac deaths. One that’s maybe a mixture of disagreeing and people misinterpreting is the Ladapo “study,” where the misinterpretations are coming from the anonymous authors who removed data contrary to their goal, and yet whose published data still showed no increase in all cause mortality (and IIRC, may have even shown a decrease among vaxx’ed). But I don’t agree with all studies on my “side” either. The CDC has pushed some garbage mask studies, and there have also been some pro-vax studies that try to minimize the myocarditis risk. But of course on the flip side there have been many studies that do show that myocarditis is the one risk from the vax that there is actually real data on, and I don’t question those. The fact of the matter is there are few actual studies out there claiming to show harm from the vaccines other than myocarditis. It’s usually just memes and blog posts. I’m not even sure what your point is with your repeated comments that have been similar to this though. Should we believe all studies?

You’re about 2.5 years late on the CDC “admitting” this

With memes

Looks like a website called “freedompress.com” is claiming this based on the lack of an announcement at all.

Your buddy is

I guess this is why cdub doesn’t like Vivek other than the racism. This does seem like a dumb idea though:

Well the guy they originally arrested but released was a member of the synagogue. Not sure if he’s been cleared or just not enough evidence to charge.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/police-release-suspect-killing-jewish-leader-samantha-woll-report

Perfect example of privilege here:

Likely unvaxxed as only 32% of people in Ghana had at least 2 doses. Sad story though. Ghoul