TimHauck

Hey @Horseman, still waiting for those discord screenshots

Other than causing some car accidents and filling up their trash cans, seems like this is what most of the Haitians in Springfield are doing, FWIW.

No

Well here is the law these officers cited which doesn’t take effect until 2025: http://laws.flrules.org/2024/85 As this is a new law which will require bystanders to remain at least 25 feet from a first responder if asked, does that mean there is no similar law on the books? If so, then wouldn’t that mean telling Campbell to leave was not actually a lawful command?

Employers in Springfield: the Haitians are hardworking and reliable Geek club: they’re savages!!

You said there were multiple eyewitness accounts in Oliveira’s video of people eating pets. There was only one who came close, who did not indicate they were pets.

I have proof that you lied

I could use some help finding the law about standing in a public area in the general vicinity of someone being pulled over, can you assist? Also, any opinion on the cops citing a law that doesn’t go into effect until 2025?

You mean one eyewitness account? There was precisely one supposed eyewitness account in the video, the guy saying he saw a van picking up cats and supposedly admit to the police they were eating them. If this is even true they were most likely strays and not people’s pets. Same guy later said he gets along with the Haitians, lol.

Benny Johnson must still be getting those Russian checks, posts the Oliveira video claiming it’s evidence people are eating pets, despite there being no evidence in the video that people are eating pets

Surely you can see how someone would interpret the below as defending the police actions/blaming Hill for what happened. But I’d appreciate it if you could please clarify by adding a more specific opinion on the police’s behavior. TIA.

I’ll let @Fireballer handle this one, he doesn’t like other people talking about police terminology

What is your opinion of the police behavior?

What are we calling “it”? Killing and eating people’s pets? If so, we’re still at it’s not happening.

Well he said careless, which is what I assumed you were questioning. When one of the cops asked the other what he was giving him, he said “seatbelt and careless.” The other guy asks “reckless?” and he says no.

Also I interpreted her project 2025 comments as a prediction, not necessarily saying that was his stated plan. There were some lies in there though, so thanks for the link. Can’t remember, were the same people saying Trump’s “bloodbath” comment was a figure of speech any of the same ones complaining about Biden saying “put him in the bullseye”?

I also don’t believe she said police officers were “murdered” on January 6th, rather that they died.

On “taking everyone’s guns,” the closest I’ve seen from Kamala is a 2019 statement saying she supported “mandatory buybacks.” Seems she has changed her position since then. But fyi posting clips of her saying she wants universal background checks, red flag laws, and an assault weapons ban is not proof she wants to take everyone’s guns.

Sorry, what does this have to do with Haitians?

Do you think this video proves Haitians in Springfield are eating people’s pets? Because it doesn’t.

I don’t follow some of these threads. Has anyone posted the photo/video of Biden visiting with a bunch of probably middle schoolers wearing Trump shirts yet? Do we still have the “more grooming from the right” thread?

I guess Donald Trump and @Horseman are Democrats now

The sentence you quoted is pretty much exactly what I said in the post.

I wasn’t searching for you, I had searched previously for people taking about 100 mph, and I believe it was only you and the board’s biggest liar suggesting that. So congrats, you’re in good company.

Please share the definition of “the scene” Mr defender of all police officers