TimHauck

But here’s proof this idiotic claim is wrong. Other causes of death were flat or increased. In other words, car accident deaths being “marked as Covid” wasn’t happening except for some isolated instances. You’re really struggling today, worse than usual.

So you agree that the “John’s Hopkins newsletter” was wrong, good to know

You didn’t answer the question. Were there excess deaths in 2020 yes or no?

So you think there were no excess deaths in 2020? That might be the worst take in this thread, and was claimed by several posters, including @Reality, @lickin_starfish, and @RaiderHaters Revenge but at least RHR admitted he was wrong.

Good summary from January 2021 of some of the things Covid skeptics were wrong about even before vaccines.

I’ve criticized the CDC’s mask “studies” too Edit: their raw data has always been pretty reliable though

^this idiot thinks investment companies would be happy to throw $25k in the trash, lol

Link? I think I’ve been wrong maybe 3 times in this thread. You righties have all of the worst takes in this thread. Some examples below. Such as @lickin_starfish and @Reality sharing that sh1tty “Johns Hopkins newsletter” that claimed there weren’t excess deaths in 2020:

I don’t though. I actually follow the evidence, regardless of what the CDC says. Funny that this racist dooshbag that once claimed to be black somehow thinks that makes me a hypocrite.

Pathetic, even for you.

Feel free to point out what you disagree with about my comment. Did you read the study?

Man, some of you need a sense of humor. Like, in your soul.

If you want commentary on that actual “study,” the biggest thing that stands out to to me is that their metric for “success” was the % decline from the peak of deaths. Which is pretty ridiculous, because it doesn’t contextualize how high the peaks were, and they could have been using ivermectin before the peak which did nothing to help prevent the peak from getting as high as it did in the first place. This sounds like a paper @Casual Observer would write, he’s obsessed with calling out that things that go up usually come down.

There are tons of well done vaccine studies showing their effectiveness especially against death. Not on the other stuff. I’m not picking and choosing, I’ve actually read many of them.

Ivermectin was approved in Peru in May 2020. The fact that Peru did horribly and had widespread use of ivermectin may be some of the best evidence we have that even if ivermectin did anything helpful (it didn’t), it wasn’t nearly enough to “prevent the EUA of the vaccines.” So thanks lod, for helping prove my point! Serious question, why do you believe every garbage study with huge conflicts of interest that you don’t even read from “Vigilant Fox,” “Chief Nerd,” “jikkyleaks” and whoever else, but don’t believe any of the piles of much larger and better studies showing how effective the vaccines have been against hospitalization and death?

I said no the first time you asked

9% of their total vaccine doses (of all brands) given have been since this vaccine was authorized according to ourworldindata. And even that consists of a small fraction from this brand.

Lol

Well except for maybe making multiple posts about “lessons for life losers” and bragging about the looks of your mid-50’s wife to a bunch of strangers on a fantasy football message board.

Steve Kirsch, lol.

Yes, obviously that is scummy and people should not sell for much if any below market value. And if the developers are so interested in the land, clearly the value hasn't dropped much if any due to the fire. What does "secure the land" mean? I don't think they should prevent people from selling, but maybe they could have a team analyze pending sales to ensure they are not selling for pennies on the dollar, maybe also try to educate everyone and ensure they're aware of how valuable their property is.

lol

Do we know if there were many people that didn't have homeowners insurance or is there any reason to believe claims will be denied? Assuming the land is extremely valuable (if the houses were small the land may even be worth more now to a developer than it was before if they don't have to knock the house down), it may make sense for some property owners to sell and move elsewhere. Of course they should do this on their own and yes developers already reaching out is extremely scummy.

You have to admit that line doesn't really make sense. If it's implying the politicians were involved in the actions that took place on the island, is he then saying he thinks they should want to fock some coal miners?

I actually like this one better I think