Jump to content

TimHauck

Members
  • Content Count

    28,387
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

Everything posted by TimHauck

  1. TimHauck

    So a person tried to assassinate Trump

    Uh, we knew officers were aware of Crooks like the day of the assassination attempt
  2. TimHauck

    Sickening xenophobia on display…

    If it’s talking about people voting for the other candidate, it kinda does. HTH
  3. TimHauck

    So a person tried to assassinate Trump

    Sheep will believe anything. There are still people that think Crooks wasn’t the dead shooter
  4. They are. But they don’t associate with non-Hasidics. They also only account for about 5% of the world’s Jews
  5. That’s like saying people that believe Qanon stuff are representative of all Republicans.
  6. There you go lumping Hasidics in with all Jews again. But to answer your question, the tunnel was filled in with concrete and at least 13 people have been charged. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/10/nyregion/new-york-synagogue-tunnels.html
  7. TimHauck

    *** 2024 Summer Olympics ***

    You don’t need multiple threads about it
  8. TimHauck

    *** 2024 Summer Olympics ***

    I’d suggest keeping the outrage over 30 seconds of a 4 hour ceremony to the other thread and keeping this one about the actual sports, but to each their own
  9. Santa Claus is making a mockery of the birth of Jesus.
  10. I wasn’t saying anything about or for Tim, but thank you for your concern
  11. Okay so you disagree with @Engorgeous George then, you think it’s a mockery because it’s being portrayed by drag queens?
  12. This is projection as you admit, but thank you for the reasonable response at least. So safe to assume if there were no drag performers involved but wearing the same outfits we would have seen the same outrage then? I doubt that, personally. And as I responded to him, the testicle thing is a red herring as that’s not why people were first outraged about it. I agree that is inappropriate, we also don’t know if it was even intentional. As for the rest of the argument, see my response to Engorgeous George above.
  13. Righties get outraged over the weirdest sh1t
  14. So not gonna answer? Even the one dude in the skit that thought it was the last supper said it was not a mockery
  15. No he didn’t, liar. You can claim he was lying, you are welcome to your opinion, but he specifically said it was not inspired by the last supper
  16. For the record I thought the Opening Ceremony sucked. The performances were mostly lackluster, although I’m sure the pouring rain didn’t help. I watched almost the whole thing and I didn’t even notice this Last Supper thing until all the righties got all outraged about it. I have previously stated the weird threesome they showed earlier on was much more inappropriate.
  17. Let’s go with it’s the last supper. Other than the exposed testicle which no one noticed at first, where is the “mockery”?
  18. One of those didn’t really. And to confirm, the guy who created it is “looking really really hard”?
  19. Well if some rando on X says it then it must be true! And even if it is, where is the “mockery”?
  20. The designer specifically said it was not the Last Supper, liar. One of the actors called it “the gay new testament,” but it looks like she was likely just mocking the outcry, not saying that’s actually what inspired it. Here is a quote from the article translated which quotes the other actor mentioned. He implies it was the Last Supper, but specifically said it was NOT “mocking” it: No one was dressed as Jesus, no one parodied him, neither in outfits nor in behaviors. The idea is to bring a new look. In the past, there have been a lot of representations of the table of the apostles and this has never shocked anyone. As if by chance, when it's LGBT and drags, it bothers. But we are used to it. People are obsessed with gender issues that bother conservatives. »
  21. Also probably worth noting of course that Jesus himself may not have hated LGBT folks. Amen
  22. No I don’t, but @nobody did do a good job exposing @Patented Phil’s likely hypocrisy on that subject.
  23. Uh, you literally just said you did. I agree the guy with his nut(s) hanging out is inappropriate, but that isn’t why everyone was initially upset about the supposed depictiion. Other than that guy, which again I bet most people didn’t even notice at first, I guess I don’t see how they’re “mocking” it (if we play along and say that’s even what it was depicting, which the artistic director said it wasn’t). If anything it would appear to be an appeal to inclusivity, I don’t see what’s upsetting other than the fact that the people in it are hated and discriminated against by many of that faith, but you are of course welcome to your opinion.
×