TimHauck

Agreed, peefoam, Tranny Overkill and HT are the worst with this

Long enough for lots of people to screenshot it. There were a few ridiculous ones:

The irony…

To confirm, anyone suggesting this was an inside job or the SS intentionally allowed it to happen is not credible, correct?

Which one? The blurry one of just one side of his face?

Most signs point to suicide unfortunately

I just did

It was an ad dummy, Joe Biden thanks you for spreading the awareness

Yes, which is part of the reason why it’s ridiculous to suggest “the party” had anything to do with the assassination attempt

Not from Matt Wallace. Is Bill Gates done yet?

Why not?

Start/sit decisions are a lot of luck, but in leagues where you actually know the people you’re playing with it’s fun to make fun of them when they leave a guy on their bench that scores 30 points

You’re also a coward for deleting it and not admitting you were wrong

Do as I say, not as I do, got it

Me and you agree more than you think

Link that isn’t using 4chan as the source?

I was referring to this, dummy

@lickin_starfish I see you deleted your post about Jacoby Jones, you focking ghoul.

Elon actually consistent here in seemingly not having an issue with (legal) “rhetoric,” although of course it’s also good for his wallet

Michelle Obama would kinda make sense as a YOLO candidate TBH. Not really burning the “bench,” and righties can’t claim they were discriminating against Kamala for being a black woman.

Sounds like you’re describing Roy Cooper from NC, but I want him to be President eventually and not wasted on a ticket with Kamala.

Not sure if this has been posted. Interesting if the timing is accurate. Also just realized there was a woman behind Trump wearing a shirt that said “mean tweets.” Hopefully she didn’t blame “rhetoric” for the shooting.

No, your long post was not about the response, it was you saying you “weren’t surprised” that someone tried to assassinate Trump because of the rhetoric coming from the left. Were you also “not surprised” by Gabby Giffords being shot after Sarah Palin put her in the crosshairs, a woman being murdered over a pride flag, or gays being killed in a mass shooting in Colorado Springs (and no @Strike, the shooter was not non-binary)?

@RLLD seemed to be the one making claims initially, and @Herbivore was just calling him out. @RLLD said “the rhetoric started” with people towards Trump. @Herbivore said no it started at minimum with Palin/Giffords and @RLLD said no it didn’t it started with people towards Trump. So the only way that would make any sense would be if @RLLD didn’t think Biden’s bullseye comment was “dangerous rhetoric”