TimHauck

Seems clear that the video starts with him trying to record DHS’s interaction with the other 2 people (I’ll call them orange backpack and black hoodie). As they go over to the sidewalk he looks like he’s trying to help black hoodie, then DHS violently shoves orange backpack (weird that Matt Van Grifter conveniently ignored that), then pepper sprays both him and black hoodie. I’ll acknowledge that what is happening with him and orange backpack after that doesn’t look like “help,” but he could have been out of sorts from being pepper sprayed, which of course could have explained him resisting on the ground as well.

I admit that for like the 10 seconds of video that we have that he was standing in the street. Not clear if he was blocking anything and it’s especially not clear if there was an “active apprehension” happening.

Yes

Pretty sure immunity doesn’t cover state charges but not 100% sure. In fact I think one of Trump’s recent corrupt pardons still was facing state charges

I’ve been watching a bunch of videos from this channel recently, they’re pretty unbiased. They did one on Minneapolis from October. There was a line where a white dude said something like “the Somalians are buying up bars and turning them into daycares,” which hits a little different now.

They can also wait a few years and hope Dems win in 2028. So far this looks like it could be a stronger case than the poet. And also pretty sure pardons would only be for federal

Or option B. Will disappear from the thread

Feds won’t charge him, pretty sure state can but IANAL

Video evidence that does not support many of your claims. “He was standing in the street” and then was struggling as they arrested him is basically the only of your claims there is evidence of. There is evidence he was filming and did not appear to have anything in his other hand. There is evidence a DHS agent pushed him, and there is no evidence I’ve seen of him touching the agent first. There is no evidence he was reaching for the gun. There is evidence they had 7 guys arresting one guy. There is evidence the gun was removed from him before he was shot. There is evidence multiple shots were fired into him after he was motionless

It is 100% confirmed factual that DHS has been caught lying on numerous occasions. I’m gonna need more than their word on this one. This is America though and you are welcome to be a sheep if you’d like.

Sure he appeared to have resisted arrest a bit, but we don’t know what he was being arrested for. IANAL but he could have an argument if he wasn’t doing anything illegal before that.

Could have something to do with constitutional rights of some of their US citizen agents being violated by DHS

You have provided no evidence for any of these claims. Please do from something other than a DHS statement who has 100% confirmed to have been caught lying on numerous occasions, or STFU.

Lol

Love it when the guy with 124 thousand posts pretends like he has better things to do

Ah that could be it. Which might still get them off the hook. Is pistol whipping proper protocol?

Except in rare fraudulent instances, Illegals don’t vote at all dummy

Looks like their excuse will be one guy removed the gun, but one or more did not know that. Still no excuse for shooting him unless there’s clear evidence the guy was reaching for his gun.

Uh, not really

We don’t know if this guy was doing something other than that before DHS pushed him. You also have a right to record in public.

Thanks for confirming you think strike’s earlier comparison here was bizarre. I agree just not for the same reason. For one, there’s no indication that this guy was actually trying to use his gun. Of course you stated definitively that he did and have not apologized yet, which you should because we don’t know that. where I feel the comparison makes sense is in regards to your comment, where you blamed this guy for what happened because he brought a gun. If anything, the court’s decision on Rittenhouse shows that generally speaking, it might not be a bad idea to bring a gun to a protest in case you need it for self defense. Again, that is the general statement, there is no indication that this guy tried to use his.

I will wait for more details on this. But if it comes out that the evidence suggests this wasn’t a clean shoot, and Trump does not condemn it. I’ll officially regret voting for him.

Saying it was justified isn’t blame. I’m fine with the court‘s decision. But you just said you blame this guy for bringing a gun. shocker that you’re a hypocrite and don’t blame Rittenhouse

Bookmarking this. The last time I said this was about Venezuela and we know that caused @Meglamaniac to get himself banned to save himself embarrassment.

Thanks for confirming that you blame Kyle Rittenhouse for the deaths of two people. and you’re doing it again, saying he was harassing them. we don’t know what he was doing other than filming them