TimHauck

Nothing wrong with being a stay at home dad either of course

For their sake, I hope #2 is a tranny

Ok racist

Cool, please quote who said they were afraid of traditional women. TIA

You realize you’re quoting a guy who is repeatedly claiming we are “sh1tting on moms” when no one has done that? Hypocrite.

Well you and Butker certainly want to influence their decision by saying it’s one of the most important titles of all.

Holy focking sh1t dude. No one (at least here, and really not that I’ve seen elsewhere) is sh1tting on homemakers. We’re simply saying it should be up to the woman to decide whether they want to be one, they don’t need men like your racist azz telling them “their life won’t really start” until they become one

Ok, hypocrite

But you’re not twisting people’s words to conclude they’re “afraid of traditional women”? Got it

I think you have it backwards. Butker and the people celebrating his comments seem afraid of women that make more money than them. I’ve noticed @Horseman has avoided this thread. @RogerDodger, do you think the “homemaker is the foundation of the family”?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/benedictine-sisters-condemn-harrison-butkers-speech-say-it-doesnt-represent-college/ar-BB1mDkMB

You’re inferring what I said, or you’re lying. Actually, I know you’re lying because I never said that and specifically said the opposite as earlier in the thread I said I’d argue being a stay at home parent is more difficult than many 9 to 5’s. The hypocrisy of you putting words in my mouth and then literally 2 minutes later denying the clear implication of Butker’s comments is pretty hilarious.

Nothing is wrong with being a homemaker. Them being “the most important piece” is yours and Butker’s opinion and you are welcome to it. But it should be up to the woman to decide if that’s what they want to do. The weird flex was the millionaire telling half of his audience they just wasted $200k on a degree when “one of the most important titles of all is a homemaker” where of course a degree is not required. They are, that’s the point. Tell that to Harrison Butker.

I own a hammer with a small handle (and normal sized head).

Why are you so confident it wasn’t a hammer? I just told you where to look in the video that it looks like a hammer to me. If it is confirmed to be a hammer, would you concede that makes it a weapon? If the dead guy was black and the incident was on video, then I think it would be described in the same way. Especially since there is also video of his previous attack on the construction workers. Sure if there was no video then his mom would probably claim it was a Bible or something.

I actually think the hammer was in his left hand. After the trooper pushes him and the guy touches himself in the chest, it looks like the head of a hammer to me. Could’ve been one with a small handle.

@5-Points, will you at least admit he was armed with something? And thus the title of your thread is incorrect

Police can certainly be stupid, that’s for sure. But they don’t usually lie about encounters that they know are on video.

It’s okay to see what you see. I’ll lean towards believing the witnesses and law enforcement that have the encounter on video and surely recovered whatever he was holding after they killed his azz.

That’s not what the sheriff’s department said.

Here’s video of what he did before his demise. Also has the sheriff’s office confirming he was armed with a hammer

Definitely some sort of weapon or 2 (possibly one in each hand), looks like it could’ve been a hammer. Witnesses and investigators say it was a hammer, so seems most likely that’s what it was.

News release says it was a hammer https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/washington-state-trooper-fatally-shoots-man-freeway-altercation-110351166

Agree. I was just pointing out that he had a weapon.

I’m just quoting the link you posted