TimHauck

Sorry, did I miss you calling out HT for making this thread political also?

HT was the first person to bring politics into this thread you hypocrite

Lol, I don’t. I’ve said multiple times for example that Covid shouldn’t have been political. In the case of Clark, she is a continuation of the trend of conservatives claiming that whites are being discriminated against. Also, this is an odd comment from a guy who’s constantly complaining about libs and the left.

I dunno, ask @EternalShinyAndChrome who said Reese’s foul was racist

FWIW, it seems to be mostly conservatives upset about it

Nashville shooter was a tranny. Lakewood shooter was not.

No, this person was not a tranny. It was a female that also used a male name as an alias to commit crimes.

Asked and answered. Also funny that you were whining earlier about the definition of mass shooting being expanded yet according to this link it was actually decreased from 4 to 3. This link was actually offered by @Strike in the same post where he linked the article the below quote is from. But it’s going all the way back to 1982 when the prevalence of AR-15’s and similar has been more recent, only counts number of incidents not number of deaths, and doesn’t include the Las Vegas shooting.

Oh no, if it’s on X it must be true!

A McDonalds near me just started advertising 20 nuggets + 2 medium fries for $9.99. Not bad

Oof, you’re repeating peefoam arguments now, you may want to take a break. That is moving the goalposts. Yes, most homicides that occur are the result of gang violence and often use illegal guns. So the solution is going to be much more complicated. But many school shootings and such use legally obtained guns. So just adding a bit more stringency to background checks and possibly limiting certain types of guns may be able to reduce those kinds of shootings or at least the number of people killed in them.

For “close combat,” sure, what about for killing as many people as possible?

Exactly

And yet they worship the guy who sped up making the vaccine available, not wanting to give him credit for the greatest achievement of his presidency. Thanks Trump for Operation Warp Speed!

So you disagree with the link @Strike provided? I know @Engorgeous George has previously provided a decent argument for a shotgun being the best gun to shoot into a crowd. But a handgun? C’mon

Not in killings of 6 or more

- @edjr since 2018

Well if handguns are better shouldn’t they still be used more often regardless?

Lol most of these are predicting drops of like 5%

Even if handguns are used more often that doesn’t mean they’re more effective at doing so. I agree that the ability to conceal is one factor contributing to that. The definition of “mass shooting” depends who you ask however. It usually doesn’t require the victims to have died, so again if handguns are used more often that doesn’t mean they’re more effective at killing more people. If we’re talking about “mass murder” there is evidence it is more often committed with AR-style guns. For example here is a quote from an article @Strike previously provided. Thanks @Strike! “In the last three years, 67% of gun massacres with six or more deaths were with assault weapons, Klarevas' 2020 report said.”

The court acknowledged they do not “effectively prevent the spread,” but in that very statement called them vaccines. Of course them not effectively preventing the spread has been true since Omicron (not before that) and is widely known.

Peefoam after I post an actual study: Ha, that study is from the Netherlands, it can’t be real! Also peefoam: well if “the Vigilant Fox” says it it must be true!

Dang, where were you getting paid $2 a gallon to get gas?

Yup

Meh, I’d believe he quit as soon as he could retire.