TimHauck

Let me know when the last time was you actually showed evidence that proved your point. If people do post actual “evidence,” many times it doesn’t even say what they think it does (I know you have done this, as has @Strike in the Covid thread). So in this thread, we have: -You, who thought the 2024 economy was worse for the lower classes than 2008, “backed up” by randos being interviewed on YouTube that didn’t even say what you claimed -People claiming slavery wasn’t the primary reason for the civil war, “backed up” by either some dude wearing a Halloween costume, or nothing at all. And the person being attacked the most is me. Gotta love the GC.

Seek help please

He was a traitor though

Like Robert E Lee?

Except if they’re about what football helmets are made out of

Technically I didn’t really bring you into this thread, @RLLD did. I made fun of him (and @Maximum Overkill) for using randos being interviewed on YouTube as their evidence. RLLD claimed I did the same thing, and linked to the thread where you and I were arguing about HFCS vs sugar and I linked a “blog post.” Interestingly you tried to discredit it at the time for being a blog post as well, yet it was from a PhD that cited multiple sources, whereas you just posted google results that didn’t back up your claims (your links just said HFCS is bad, I agree, my point was it’s not much different than sugar, sugar is bad too but your links did not compare the two). Much different than a video of some guy playing dress up.

OK I’ll just mark that down as you still refusing to admit you believed an incorrect CBS news article. Back on topic, speaking of people coming off horribly in this thread, any comment on @Horseman claiming slavery wasn’t the primary reason for the Civil War or @Maximum Overkill saying it had nothing to do with it?

Only because he won’t admit he got got by an incorrect lame stream media article

Congrats, you had to admit you were wrong about something you said you never said because you got shown receipts. Are you saying you’ve admitted 50 times that you believed an incorrect CBS article? When it comes to being wrong about actual arguments, you do the same thing you’re accusing me of doing: either backtrack or move the goal posts. Or just disappear from the thread and never return

Will you admit you believed an incorrect CBS News article about the kid in North Dakota?

I’m sorry to hear that. I like most of your posts. And perhaps you’ll remember I admitted I was wrong about something to you recently. I admit when I’m wrong. @Strike does not.

I admitted I was wrong, since supposedly he planned to testify. But we’ll never know if he actually would have.

I ask for links because many here like to make sh1t up. Most of the time they don’t provide any links at all (like @Horseman here). Other times they provide nonsense like randos being interviewed on YouTube, like you and @Maximum 0verkill. If someone provides an actual legitimate link I will acknowledge it, and read it. I prefer to go to primary sources first, but I like to read opinions from both sides in order to come to an unbiased, data-based conclusion.

It was a blog that referenced multiple primary sources. Not some dude in a Confederate soldier Halloween costume, holy sh1t. @jerryskids was wrong in that thread, btw (yip yap!)

I said BOTH “reportedly” and “if confirmed.” So yes, that means I wasn’t sure it was true.

No that’s the same thing I said at the time. Will you admit you believed an incorrect CBS news article about the kid in North Dakota?

I admitted that I didn’t realize there were 2 different hearings, and that it did appear he was planning to testify for that one. He did however refuse to testify for a different one. Will you admit you believed an incorrect CBS article about the kid in North Dakota?

Did he testify for the hearing in question? Yes or no

I admitted I was wrong that he “was planning” to testify for that particular hearing, but he did refuse to testify for a different one. And he never did end up testifying since he got arrested, so technically you were never proven totally correct there. You STILL won’t admit that you believed an incorrect CBS article about the kid in North Dakota…

Former coworker of mine said the same exact line about Lakers championships. Granted that was before the National Guard and Marines showed up.

Please link to me using a rando being interviewed on YouTube as evidence. Thanks in advance

Bathrooms, yes. Locker rooms, no.

No. Good to know you disagree with a lot of the statements Riley Gaines has made though.

No, I wouldn’t.

Randos being interviewed on YouTube are pretty much never a valid source. HTH