TimHauck

1. I would bet “discussions” of marriage are absolutely more often “initiated” by women. This of course does not contradict anything I said earlier. I do think it is human nature for women to want to get married and have families. I just don’t necessarily think it’s human nature for women to want their primary occupation to be a homemaker. 2. I agree with that on “families,” AKA children. But IMO the biggest financial reason to delay marriage is the cost of engagement rings and the wedding itself, not the cost of being married. If anything being married saves money by being able to get on the health insurance plan of who’s ever coverage is better (and I know people that rushed into marriage due to health insurance).

Well if the topic is views on women’s lives, I think it would be relevant if she doesn’t see much difference between children and adult women

Was she a pedo? She and her long-time lover, Jean-Paul Sartre, along with numerous other French intellectuals, campaigned for the release of people convicted of child sex offenses and signed a petition which advocated the abolition of age of consent laws in France.[11]

“Not even approached with marriage”? You realize probably like 90% of engaged couples have discussed their plans before actually getting engaged right? This isn’t 1950. Why would marriage rates fall because people don’t feel like they can afford a family without 2 incomes? If anything that should raise marriage rates…

Is there really much shaming in the real world of women that choose to be homemakers? I would disagree with that being the case as it is of course very common for women to be stay at home moms. If anything there are a significant number of women that would tell you that being a stay at home mom with multiple children is actually more difficult than working a 9-5 (and thus would not shame them), and I know several women that chose to work partly for that reason (they still loved their kids of course but couldn’t handle being with them 24/7). There of course are some working moms that would rather be a homemaker if their family could afford it, but there are also stay at home moms that really only chose to do it for financial reasons. To pay for daycare for 2 kids and not just break even, a woman basically needs to make around $50K+.

Do you agree with what he said about IVF and surrogacy?

Yeah that’s dumb. Has he done that before this thread though?

1) I’d agree, because they could have gotten just as good of an education for a fraction of the price if they went to a community college and/or went to a public in-state school. Not because they should all go be homemakers 2) You still don’t tell that to them at their graduation, lol

Catholics are the ones pushing “dangerous gender ideologies”? And he’s not saying Biden was responsible for Covid lockdowns is he?

He talked about how glad he was that his wife “converted to the faith.” Kinda sounds like something a groomer would say

The dude went to a college graduation and told half of them they just wasted 4 years and $200k, lolololol

He said IVF and surrogacy “stem from pervasiveness of disorder,” lol

He said being gay is a deadly sin lol

No way, I’d say it’s no more than 50% that actually want to be a “homemaker.” Many want to have a career, and a lot of hot gold diggers don’t want to have a career or do much of anything around the house. Tons of hot wives of wealthy people that also have nannies or au pairs.

Moms, or stay at home moms? Funny when kickers try to act tough

Nope.

He better win gold in Paris or he might have to come off my list He seemed to do fine with the stuff that required actual athleticism, just had no charisma. WWE fans also didn’t like that he had prior sexual assault allegations (even though the charges were dropped)

It’s unfortunate that Gable Steveson wasted 2 years of his life trying to be good at fake wrestling when it was clear he wasn’t, despite being the best in the world at real wrestling

This doesn’t contradict anything I said

The entire world was looking for effective treatments for Covid and many studies were done trying to find one. It is absolute nonsense to suggest that the government was okay with hundreds of thousands dying just so that they could help out big pharma. Besides, even if ivermectin was effective it wouldn’t have prevented the EUA. A pill you need to take every day is very different from a vaccine

No, like I said multiple times dating back to 2021, it was dumb for the MSM to call all ivermectin horse paste since many people were taking the human version. It was also likely harmless (as long as it wasn’t used as a substitute for the vaccine), it just didn’t work for Covid. I see you never commented on my links you asked for proving you wrong. I’ll take that as an admission of defeat, thanks.

Righties think Chris Cuomo is smart now

Yes it is a great drug. It just doesn’t work for Covid, and people shouldn’t take the stuff intended for animals which usually also contains other ingredients.

You’re such a focking fraud. @BudBro is the one playing the gotcha game here…