TimHauck

Uh, that's 2

This is a bit extreme but I get what you're saying. I am surprised by the pro-Palestine sentiment from some high profile Dems, even ones that aren't Muslims. I mean, aren't most Jews dems? Can't imagine this will sit well with them. Reminds me a bit of the conservatives pushing extreme abortion bans even though many of their voters don't agree with it.

2

Obviously still not good, but I'd rather the news be accurate on all sides. What was the verdict on that Ben Shapiro photo (I believe originally shared by Netanyahu) that people were claiming was a dog? Was it actually the dog that was photoshopped?

Besides, I am pro-Israel, but speaking of hoaxes, was the "butchering of babies" actually confirmed? I certainly wouldn't put it past Hamas and them raping women was confirmed, but hadn't seen if the baby claims were.

Meh, her pushing the hospital hoax after it was debunked is way worse than this. Unless there is a specific interview of her I haven’t seen, from what I can tell, her being “specifically asked to condemn the butchering of children” was really just someone yelling at her as she was leaving her office and she just ignored them.

Ed Dowd: proven fraud (TL/DR: the cover of his book about “sudden deaths” featured a photo of a child that was unvaccinated) https://news.yahoo.com/rfk-jr-spent-years-stoking-155201428.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw&tsrc=twtr

I did. And like I said, 8% mortgage interest is a valid complaint against Biden. Banks closing branches isn’t. Wrong Tim, Utoilet.

What was the point? Do you think you need to go to a bank to get a mortgage? But yes, 8% interest rates are something you can complain about Biden contributing to. Not bank branches closing.

Neither did bank branches closing, dummy.

Bank branches are closing because the internet means people don’t have to go to the bank. Not because Biden.

It’s called the internet. Most people hardly ever need to go to a physical bank.

FWIW, hired at DHS in 2019…

Dang never realized he killed someone else too.

Thanks for the spirited, intelligent discussion

Agree, including about shootings in North Dakota as well

Great post jerry (seriously)

Isn’t “the Palestinian government”…Hamas?

I’m not denying that, I’m saying the wrestlers, in particular those on the team when Jordan was a coach, are the ones that got the story out into the public. Earlier you mentioned “powerful predatory homosexuals” in the plural form, but as far as Jordan is concerned, the anger is only about Strauss. And honestly most of them aren’t even mad at what he did or didn’t do at the time, just that he’s denying any knowledge of it now.

You’re rewriting your own version of history, but I’m not surprised for the Geek Club. The wrestlers are why the abuse from Strauss came to light in the first place, and then other athletes came forward as well. I agree with your earlier post that he was a nobody, so combined with the report that he allegedly did actually try to do something about it at the time, it’s odd that he would deny any knowledge of it now.

There was a minor story about that but that’s not what the anger against Jordan is about. It’s about him denying knowledge of abuse by Doctor Strauss, even though the head coach has acknowledged it, and the university has now paid out over $60 million in settlements for.

Multiple accounts of specific conversations between wrestlers and Jordan: https://www.si.com/college/2023/10/13/jim-jordan-speaker-candidacy-roils-osu-wrestling-community The odd thing is that there's even a report of Jordan confronting Strauss: https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/former-ohio-state-wrestler-shares-time-he-confronted-jim-jordan-about-dr-richard-strauss/ So it's not even like he did nothing at the time, he's just pretending now that it never happened.

It’s not a lie.

Jordan denied being aware of sexual abuse at Ohio State despite multiple people saying they told him personally.

Holy sh1t look at this self-own from one of the most popular "truth seeking" "journalists" currently: