TimHauck

No. I prefer data to random interviews.

The point remains, tax value was only mentioned regarding Mar a Lago, so just one of many properties, and even when it was, the focus was more on the fact that Trump was valuing it as a personal residence when it could not have been. Plus, mentioning the tax value was actually called out (by CNN even!) when it happened as not being reflective of market value - https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/03/business/trump-fraud-judge-mar-a-lago/index.html Probably why it was not included in the final decision. While the judge screwed up mentioning it at all, the tax value was clearly a negligible part of the case, not “much” of it like you claimed.

Yup, it’s ridiculous to single out Jon Stewart because of the natural result of the real estate market. But what Trump did had nothing to do with the natural result of the real estate market.

You presented links to some randos getting interviewed, that’s not “proof.”

1) I pretty much answered the question in my reply to @Engorgeous George. But it’s still wrong and not even remotely similar to what Jon Stewart “did.” 2) Didn’t you post the link to the 92 page document when you were talking with @The Real timschochet ? But OK, here ya go, as I stated the Mar a Lago piece is on page 67, where the focus is more on Trump valuing it as a personal residence when it is not able to be used as a personal residence https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/trump-decision.pdf 3) You said MUCH of James’s case was based on tax valuations, which is clearly not true. Even in the document you shared, there were sections for 6 other properties (Trump Tower Triplex, Seven Springs Estate, Trump Park Avenue, 40 Wall Street, Aberdeen, US Golf Clubs). Mar a Lago was the only one that mentioned a tax appraisal, which once again was not included in the final decision. Clearly it wasn’t much of her argument, this case is not even remotely similar to Jon Stewart selling a property for higher than the tax value. You’re wrong.

As it should have been…

Never said you did. But apparently @Strike and much of right wing twitter are

This is probably true, and yeah it’s probably true that many others are doing similar things without being taken to court. But it’s still wrong, and not remotely similar to someone selling their property for higher than the tax value.

That is only in the summary judgement. I don’t see any reference to the tax valuation of Mar a Lago in the final 92 page document (it is discussed on page 67). And even in the summary judgement that is the only property where the tax valuation is referenced, yet you said that’s what MUCH of her case was based on. It’s okay, you can admit you were wrong.

Found another guy that watched the twitter clip that was sped up to 100x

What @Mike Honcho just said. Will you at least admit you were wrong that James’ case was not based on TAX valuations? If not then there’s no use conversing with you.

The winner of the backtracking competition is… @Strike!!

I’ll admit I haven’t followed every detail of the case, but I can guaranfockingtee they didn’t get a judgement based on TAX valuations. It’s because he lied to lenders/banks. What I mentioned earlier was that it was discovered that he also lied about the occupancy rates of his buildings, which could have had an impact on taxes.

Do you think what Trump did is remotely similar to a property being assessed by the government at a lower value than it’s actual market value?

March 18 2:30 PM: spokesman says Ohtani paid debts for Mizuhara March 20 8:32 AM: spokesman says Ippei is lying

Conservatives are really riding this Jon Stewart thing. Posobiec, Catturd, Jimmy Dore, Robby Starbuck, Charlie Kirk, the Gateway Pundit, the NY Post etc all reading off the same script. Holy fock they’re dumb.

But wasn’t there like 2 days between when some of the details were first coming out and the press conference? I’m shocked if no one else talked to Ohtani between then

Catturd on a major stupid streak right now

Does he talk to anyone else besides this dude? Wasn’t it like 2 days between when the story first came out and he supposedly was “shocked” to find out what happened?

Surely you know the difference between a tax valuation that Is set by the government and the actual market value, right? Maybe not, because you and all the people like Timcast on social media looking for gotchas are focking idiots. If you’re trying to say yea that’s no different than what Trump did, no. In terms of the tax implications, it looks like one of the main things he lied about is the occupancy rate of his properties. Not just simply paying property taxes on assessed values that are lower than market value.

Yeah his follow up posts are even worse. ”I worked on an oil rig, so I know!!”

Agree, Biden made it worse, but @RLLD saying “Biden inherited a good economy” is one of the more dumb things ever said on here, and it’s laughable that he won’t admit that. Can we get back to the bridge collapse though? Is it safe to confirm that former Tucker guest “Catturd” is just a “moron on the internet?”

Occam’s razor to me in this case would be the initial story about paying his friend’s debts. I’m skeptical that they could make a public statement about that and he would apparently have no idea what was happening.

Maybe you missed the post that Rusty first responded to with his TDS