TimHauck

Agree, but it is poorly worded and I could certainly see bigots that lack common sense and logic trying to report gay people for holding hands or something

It’s fine to bring up and it is part of the reason why additional boosters shouldn’t be recommended for young men. But claiming “Fauci finally admits it” is retarded.

I wouldn’t say there’s an overwhelmingly large number of studies that I “disagree” with, mostly just the small non-randomized and sometimes fraudulent ivermectin studies. Most of the time it’s more an issue of people misrepresenting what the study’s data actually says. Off the top of my head, some examples include the “Cleveland clinic study” which people have incorrectly claimed proves “more shots, more infections;” and the Christine Stabell Benn study which I’ve discussed with @jerryskids that people have used to incorrectly claim the mRNA vaxxes are causing a significant number of cardiac deaths. One that’s maybe a mixture of disagreeing and people misinterpreting is the Ladapo “study,” where the misinterpretations are coming from the anonymous authors who removed data contrary to their goal, and yet whose published data still showed no increase in all cause mortality (and IIRC, may have even shown a decrease among vaxx’ed). But I don’t agree with all studies on my “side” either. The CDC has pushed some garbage mask studies, and there have also been some pro-vax studies that try to minimize the myocarditis risk. But of course on the flip side there have been many studies that do show that myocarditis is the one risk from the vax that there is actually real data on, and I don’t question those. The fact of the matter is there are few actual studies out there claiming to show harm from the vaccines other than myocarditis. It’s usually just memes and blog posts. I’m not even sure what your point is with your repeated comments that have been similar to this though. Should we believe all studies?

You’re about 2.5 years late on the CDC “admitting” this