TimHauck

I was not commenting on what his ideology was. However his mom said he was only left “leaning.” Strike seems to think his dad also commented about his ideology but pretty sure that’s yet another lie that he’ll refuse to acknowledge. I thought the link was relevant because multiple posters here were quick to jump in to post the articles saying something to the effect of law enforcement was investigating possible ties to Robinson and left wing terror groups

Anonymous sources, but three of them, claim no evidence yet tying Robinson to left-wing groups. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/no-evidence-charlie-kirk-shooting-left-wing-groups-rcna232513

Example?

I definitely won’t vote for Trump if he runs again. I prefer to follow the constitution

No most of the ones I was talking about are now in Venezuela after we freed some innocent Americans and a murderer in exchange for sending some non-gang members that we sent to CECOT to Venezuela. Yes, we.

Yes numerous people were sent to a terrorist prison for entering the country illegally, unless you’re trying to play semantics by saying they also had tattoos that idiot ICE agents thought were gang tattoos (mind you, border patrol agents are allowed to have gang tattoos). I voted for Obama in 2008 but not 2012.

I’ve never claimed to lean right, I vote for Dems too and probably the only politician I legitimately like (NC Attorney General Jeff Jackson) is a Dem. Can you provide an example of something I argued against that a centrist should support? A few of my opinions: -Charlie Kirk was divisive, but didn’t deserve to get killed for it. -covid was dangerous and the vaccine was effective, especially before Omicron -we shouldn’t fund another country murdering civilians, especially when they don’t even need our help to do so -we shouldn’t murder people in international waters because we think they might be drug traffickers -we shouldn’t send people to terrorist prisons simply for entering the country illegally -we were told we’d be focusing the deportations on the “worst of the worst,” yet we are spending more resources just trying to hit a made up quota and rounding up roofers and people outside of Home Depot I don’t think these are leftist positions, but let me know if I missed any.

3x Trump voter. I was pretty happy with his first term, not so much so far with this one but probably still better than the alternative.

Yeah if the killer was a Democrat, killing Kirk was stupid because it’s only going to make his movement bigger.

I don’t think he was a grifter. He believed what he was saying. He also put a lot of work into what he did by traveling around the country, unlike some of the true grifters that don’t do much more than posting on x, sometimes while living in other countries. But while he was civil in his discussion, he didn’t try to “reach across the aisle,” he was trying to get people to join his side, and when he was posting on x or talking with other conservatives, he was often divisive. Of course he didn’t deserve to be killed for it, but I bet there were a lot of non-liberals that didn’t like him (myself included).

Your presence is requested in the MN lawmaker murder thread

Lots of religious references in here. Seems like a possible separation of church and state issue https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-resolution/719/text

Like people here claiming Kirk saying “stupid Muslims” isn’t a slight against all Muslims?

What did the bill do?

Maduro’s youtube channel no longer available, allegedly deleted by YouTube

So we know what games this dude played, but still no evidence he spouted “leftist rhetoric” other than saying Charlie Kirk spreads hate?

Also apparently Venezuela claims they captured a DEA agent along with 3.7 metric tons of cocaine who they say was planning a false flag operation (and no, I’m not saying I believe this): https://www.latintimes.com/venezuela-announces-capture-alleged-dea-agents-massive-drug-shipment-589688

Another boat blown up, 3 killed.

I think @Meglamaniac reported him

Oh ok yes you are correct there

Correct. MAGA was trying to paint him as anything other than one of their own. Fact check: true. Again, looks like they were correct, but they were doing it before there was any evidence.

His statement was not false. MAGA was desperately trying to paint the killer as not one of their own. It’s looking like they are correct, but they were doing it before we even knew who the shooter was. (And don’t do the “yeah because he shot Charlie Kirk!” thing, because conservatives were also quick to blame the MN lawmaker murder on libs on the most scant, and sometimes false, evidence. And some are even still doing it despite all the evidence to the contrary).

You did, and then you yelled at me for providing some. An x post is a “sound bite snippet”?

Didn’t you literally ask for examples of things that he said? And then yelled at people for answering you? It was horrible that he died, and it’s especially sad since he never advocated for violence, but some people are acting like he was MLK or something, he wasn’t. Here’s a good example of a comment he made with an obvious implication (invoking 9/11 when talking about Mamdani), but I’m sure you’ll say “there’s nothing wrong with that, he was just stating 2 facts!!!” And again I’m acknowledging that Kimmel “implied” the shooter was MAGA, but he didn’t say it. And even if he did, I’d argue that’s not worth being cancelled over. The cancellations should have been reserved for the people celebrating Kirk’s death which Kimmel clearly didn’t do.

Which is exactly what you guys have been doing in regards to many of Kirk’s past statements… And no, pointing out that Kirk made many divisive statements is not justifying his murder you lying POS