TimHauck

And you’re out in the open, Mr Gaywebcam.com. NTTAWWT

Lol what a terrible post. 1) resorting to homophobic name calling helps prove the study author’s theory 2) “leftists” weren’t the ones that committed most of the violence during the 2020 riots, those were mostly criminals that have probably never noted 3) lol at giving a couple examples of serious crimes that leftists have committed, but ignoring ones that righties have. The OP isn’t about violence anyway, both sides of course will have some violent crazies

Those aren’t “idols.” What is SJP?

Don’t think it’s been confirmed that the pharma company was behind Loomer’s posts, but they have been linked to some of the other hit pieces. But good summary here: https://x.com/kevinnbass/status/1951707986260611168

Jose Aponte, principal lecturer at the University of North Texas

Low T men support Trump?

So kinda like you saying you just want “spirited, intelligent debate” and then changing your mind and often resorting to name calling?

Man in UK dies after taking Fenbendazole, the new trendy drug often used in animals that ivermectin-pushers are now latching onto, which is not approved for human consumption. Sad, misinformation may have contributed to his death if he turned to this instead of more proven treatments (I’m sure his history of drinking and drug use contributed as well). https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgjn7z7v04o

People celebrating this guy’s death are terrible humans

It was stupid for this guy to complain about it, but I did think this was funny:

I usually make pancakes on Sundays.

Update. I see “Doja Cat” is complaining about it, but that’s about all I can find as far as notable lefties. @EternalShinyAndChrome, any others? Update 2. I watched the GMA clip. It wasn’t actually GMA, it was “GMA First Look” which apparently is on at like 4am, the segment was like 30 seconds long and the hosts didn’t even really provide an opinion, they basically just interviewed some college professor that complained about it. I was told by someone it was on the Today show but can’t find an actual clip (meanwhile the “GMA” clip was easy to find), although there was an article. https://x.com/FreeBeacon/status/1950226357977239969

Yeah I went back and looked. I know @Horseman is both stupid and a liar, not sure which he was being here. Maybe both.

@Horseman still mad I call out the multiple times he falls for fake news, lol

Sydney Sweeney = registered Republican. As if GC righties could love her any more

Can you (or anyone) please share who notable on the left is “melting down”? I’m sure out of 150 million people there will be some nobodies that are. But so far, I think I’ve seen a short clip from GMA and the Today show, and a few articles, but that’s about it. I just did a quick search on x and the only left-leaning account I had heard of before criticizing it is an account called “Evan loves worf,” but it only has about 140k followers. Meanwhile, on the right complaining about the alleged complaining you have, among others: Megyn Kelly (3.6M) Colin Rugg (1.8M) Vigilant Fox (1.8M) Patrick Bet David (1.3M) Nick Sortor (1M)

I didn’t say Vance was melting down. But enough on the right were that he felt the need to comment about it. I might classify the clip of Megyn Kelly from the Daily Show as melting down though.

If they have temporary protected status, they’re not currently illegal

I thought my point was pretty clear. I don’t consider recognizing a Palestinian state as giving Hamas what they want (as @supermike80 suggested).

This is an ironic response in this thread considering I was the first person to call out some on the left saying it was a Nazi ad and saying that was stupid. I just disagree with any claims that the left was/is “melting down” about it. But the right IS melting down in response. Even JD Vance is talking about it.

So do you agree that recognizing a Palestinian state isn’t “giving Hamas what they want”?

Taking the dog for a walk and wanted to recap some of the relevant posts relating to my point about Strike saying Gazans “deserve whatever fate befalls them” (direct quote). I left out ones I didn’t feel were relevant so not all of these were in direct response to each other. But notably the last two from RealTim and Strike were. To summarize: 1) Strike said Gazans “deserve whatever fate befalls them” (direct quote) because they elected Hamas 20 years ago. 2) RealTim says that even if Hamas was elected recently, the civilians still wouldn’t deserve to die, then reiterated this again in a later post. 3) Strike then uses his Hiroshima comparison. I suppose Strike may try to quibble over RealTim in his second post saying “responsible for” rather than “deserve” which was the focus of original conversation. But he didn’t call that out in his last post here, which was in direct response to that one from RealTim and which is the one where he brought up Hiroshima, AND starts out with the phrase “Yes Tim, unfortunately that’s how WAR works” (direct quote). So for Strike, the question remains: 1) Did the Japanese in Hiroshima deserve to get bombed? 2) If not, how is that relevant to the conversation above?

I didn’t say “good at,” I said “they’re good,” as in they’re happy. Sorry if you misunderstood.

Huh, are you denying Hamas has released videos of their starving hostages, including one digging his own grave? Be careful, Jerry and strike might call you Hamas Harry!

It’s not an actual member of the UN though. You seem to be playing both sides of the coin by talking about no one being able to stop Hamas running things, but also said that we’d be giving them what they want by recognizing a two-state solution. If they’re good running things as is, why would they care about us recognizing a two-state solution?