Jump to content

TimHauck

Members
  • Content Count

    29,140
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Everything posted by TimHauck

  1. I saw Saints talk about scenarios with Airbnb, I didn’t think he was necessarily saying that’s what he thought James did with the property. Any comment on the fact that there is an Airbnb listing at literally the exact intersection you named?
  2. That combined with if she rented it out for less than 6 months of the first year, then yup pretty sure she did.
  3. Maybe I missed but I don’t think anyone here was saying she used this house as an airbnb. Nonetheless, this one looks to be at Lafayette and Perrone. https://www.airbnb.com/l/QuMjxp1r
  4. It’s on the same street as a listed previous address of her niece that she later bought the other house for. For that reason, very reasonable to believe that she stayed there.
  5. If she rented it out for longer than 6 months of the first year, it looks like that would be breaking the law.
  6. Actually the second home rider also includes a caveat that it’s not illegal if you get approval from your lender in writing (so no, @SaintsInDome2006, just a phone call would not suffice).
  7. ChatGPT claims he was an Army veteran and lawyer, but not verified.
  8. I will keep this post in mind for initial verdicts on future cases.
  9. Of course you’d side with the guy that refuses to read 3 pages that will answer his questions and confirm I’m correct.
  10. Yup. I’ve seen people bring up “TaX fRAuD!!” but she’s not being charged with tax fraud.
  11. Because you said you “gotta say there’s more.” If you don’t want to take my word for it that there’s not, you can find out for sure by reading it.
  12. Another lie because the main reason I started posting here was to discuss a topic that shouldn’t have been political, and I specifically tried to keep politics out of it. If you enjoy talking about financial issues, I think it would be in your best interest to read the indictment. It’s pretty short. But again, you are welcome to remain uninformed.
  13. Liar. I did not vigorously defend him, I said it was possible he was a fraudster very early on. For someone that “doesn’t care” about this topic, you’ve typed a lot of words about it this morning. But you are welcome to be uninformed, it’s a free country, for now.
  14. Then read the indictment. You could have done that in less time than it’s taken you to respond multiple times here. The part talking about the actual allegations is only 3 pages long, double spaced. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26184192-james-indictment/
  15. I was looking into them, and was told by multiple lenders that I could call it a second home as long as I used it myself for one day, and could rent it out the rest. But as you alluded to elsewhere, even if you don’t, I think you can make an argument about if you intended to do so then something changed.
  16. That’s all there is, at least for this current indictment
  17. It says she indicated zero personal use days on a tax form or forms. It does not say what year or years that was. According to the second home rider, all that matters is the first year.
  18. Except we don’t know if she actually used it as she said she would, at least in the first year which is all that matters here
  19. Colombian President says a recent boat blown up was Colombian with Colombian citizens. He says the war isn’t against drugs, it’s a war for oil. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c89dz920p0do?xtor=AL-71-[partner]-[bbc.news.twitter]-[headline]-[news]-[bizdev]-[isapi]&at_campaign_type=owned&at_link_id=8F784828-A4F0-11F0-AA5D-DE6CF6DB551C&at_link_type=web_link&at_bbc_team=editorial&at_format=link&at_medium=social&at_link_origin=BBCWorld&at_ptr_name=twitter&at_campaign=Social_Flow
  20. Yes to your first question. Pretty sure the answer to your second question is you can, but @jonnyutah seems to think you can’t. But, I believe you do have to at least “use” the property for at least 1 day in the year. And I’m also pretty sure all of those rules (same with the Lisa Cook thing), at least as it relates to mortgage fraud, only apply to the first year of ownership.
  21. She didn’t miss though. She won, remember? Even the recent appeal did not overturn the verdict.
  22. And the WH held a meeting with a bunch of x sh1tposters because one of them assaulted a woman and stole someone else’s flag.
×