TimHauck

It doesn’t seem logical to shoot into a van at all, especially if it was only at the back of it, no way of knowing who if anyone is inside.

Maybe he thought the van was a Venezuelan boat

The bullets definitely said that, there are lots of photos. We don’t know if the shooter was just trolling though. I’m gonna assume he actually wrote it, but I guess that isn’t 100% guaranteed

Past arrests for marijuana

Looks like mom was a lib. So all the folks making fun of people that claimed Tyler Robinson was conservative because his parents were, will naturally assume this shooter was a lib because his mom was.

Ivermectin doesn’t work for Covid

Well according to law enforcement that’s literally what the Kirk shooter did with his bullets, so…

I mean if I was committing an anti ICE shooting I’d probably write “Fock ICE” not “anti ICE.” I do see he apparently shot into a van, so I’d still say it’s about 50/50 shot either way.

Could just be trolling at this point with all the news about engraved bullets recently

Shooter still on the loose right?

So the person was either a really sh1tty shooter, or targeting the detainees.

I guess righties haven’t learned to wait like 5 minutes for information to come out. And no I’m not talking about the political leanings of the shooter. I’m talking about the claim it was “an attack on law enforcement” when it might not even be that.

Looks like detainees were the targets.

Who was President during the early days of Covid again?

Link to it being dropped? I just see that the only people charged were the Russian nationals, but being in Russia the gov (especially the current one) probably isn’t trying hard to find them. Not sure what that has to do with the government censoring YouTube creators though; YouTube didn’t do anything about it until after the indictment came out, and Tenet dissolved as a company. The indictment said from the beginning that the creators were victims, nothing bad happened to them other than being made fun of for not realizing they were taking Russian money. Heck the podcast of one of them is where the FCC’s Brendan Carr made his threats against ABC! @jonnyutah is fair to mock if people think it’s “(d)ifferent” becsuse of the content involved. But where it is truly different is in the actions of the government. YouTube claims there was “pressure,” but also says they continued to do their own moderating. It’s not a violation of the first amendment to ask a company to review something to take down, then do nothing if they say no. That’s basically what we saw with the Twitter files. Yet here we had the FCC openly saying “we can do this the easy way or the hard way.” If they don’t do anything further about this then you can say it’s somewhat comparable, but Trump truth’d that he was going to “go after” ABC…

No examples of videos or even who they’re saying was banned is kinda weak IMO. I don’t know about you but I saw plenty of misinfo on YouTube that wasn’t censored. In fact many fans of the misinfo spreaders would often try to get people they disagreed with banned, like happened with Susan Oliver who would often point out the lies of John Campbell, who made millions on YouTube spreading lies. Feels like they’re trying to blame what they did on their own on Biden to get in the good graces of the current admin. Because if they were censoring folks, they were probably doing it in 2020 too.

This one does. The inflammation point was discussed at 6:20

It’s not banning food dyes or frying French fries in beef tallow. It’s getting Americans to exercise more. What are some suggestion on how we do that?

Yes that is what I’m saying, read my post above about what they did and didn’t deny. The “crux of the argument” depends on what exactly you’re calling “the allegation.”

This is a weird semantic argument to make. As Strike would say:

Fact: Homan denied doing anything illegal. Fact: Homan did not deny accepting a bag of cash in a Cava bag. Fact: Cook (through her lawyer, not sure why that matters, even Strike would agree) denied committing mortgage fraud Fact: Cook did not deny taking out two mortgages that were for primary residences (and I never denied she did either). Not sure what your gotcha attempt is.

Yes good comparison! I specifically acknowledged that Homan may not have done anything illegal because he wasn’t a government official at the time. Do you acknowledge that Cook may not have done anything illegal?

Well I do know you used that argument about Lisa Cook…

Like Homan’s interview?