TimHauck

Seems to all be coming from the same anonymous source

“Each of the six sources familiar with the investigation told Axios that investigators believe Robinson had a romantic relationship with his roommate”

Still waiting for those quotes form his dad, liar

Lol

Good to know anonymous sources are indisputable proof now, noted. (this tidbit may turn out be true, but it’s not “indisputable”)

Hopefully it’s not the same “source” that said the bullets had transgender writings on them, which turned out to be wrong. Gay seems to be a similar likelihood.

More plausible, yes. But that doesn’t mean people should have immediately blamed the left before even knowing who shot him.

I believe the police report mentioned getting information from a roommate

Not all righties love Kirk. Of course, despite saying this it hasn’t stopped Loomer from blaming the left for Kirk’s death

Well someone did try to kill Fuentes also

Strike voice: Anonymous sources!!!!

Yes, the police report said “a family member,” and did not say anything about a particular side other than that he didn’t like Kirk. Maximum Tranny said “his dad and best friend said he was a leftist.” Unless someone can link to those claims, I’m gonna go ahead and assume that Maximum Tranny is lying.

Nope, captain of the wrestling team

All I’ve seen was a “former friend” who hadn’t talked to him since high school claim he was a leftist. Haven’t seen any comments from his dad or even “best friend.” If you could share them, that would be great. Otherwise, acknowledge that @Maximum Overkill is a liar. Earlier in this thread Strike was saying certain people should stay out of this thread. Like Charlie Kirk and unlike Strike, I believe in free speech so I think anyone that wants to should post in this thread. But if anyone should stay out of the thread it’s probably obvious trolls like Maximum Tranny.

https://trending.knowyourmeme.com/editorials/guides/what-is-the-notices-bulge-owo-whats-this-meme-the-phrase-inscribed-on-the-casing-of-the-bullet-fired-at-charlie-kirk-explained The meme is meant to make fun of furry roleplaying, including the language and typing quirksstereotypically attributed to roleplayers and furries. Notably, the meme uses the symbol "OwO," which is an emoticon commonly used by furries to portray a cutesy surprised face, similar to "UwU." It is also used outside the furry community on the internet, often ironically. Since 2015, the phrase has been popularized not only as a way of making fun of furries and related communities for being cringe, but has also been embraced by furries as a way of owning the meme. The phrase has appeared in numerous memes over the past decade, including ironic memes on sites like Tumblr, X / Twitter and Reddit, among others. While it is popular among furries, the meme has also evolved past the community, inspiring memes that reference it outside any specific community or fandom, such as memes that spell out the phrase in creative ways. Ultimately, the phrase is portrayed in memes as being one of the most cringeworthy things someone could possibly write to another person. As furries have increasingly embraced the meme, it has become harder to tell whether any individual meme using the phrase is made by a furry, a troll or just a regular meme lover.

If he was starting to change his mind about Israel, it wasn’t because someone said something that changed his mind. It would have been because Israel is doing things that make it harder and harder to defend them.

Link?

About what? Well it is possible he was in the process of changing his mind about Israel… I’ll acknowledge that “hate” wouldn’t be the first word I’d use to describe some of the things he said. But “divisive” for sure.

Those murders are absolutely relevant to this thread. 1) They were politically motivated, and a US Senator made light of them, but there was little outrage about that from righties. 2) It proves people like @5-Points wrong who claimed 99.9% of political violence is committed by the left. It also shows the hypocrisy since people said stuff in here like of course he was killed by a leftist because it’s Charlie Kirk, yet tried to find any reason to blame the MN shootings of 2 Democrats on a leftist. The fact that to this day people continue to deny the overwhelming evidence that Boelter was a righty (even though I know some here don’t really believe that and are just trolling) is insane to me, and is further proof of the blind partisanship on both sides.

That’s not “building bridges” IMO. He was for free speech, but he didn’t really want to change his own mind about anything, he wanted to change others’ minds, and if he realized they wouldn’t, gotcha them and then post a clip to social media for his followers to laugh at them.

He posted here. No clue his occupation or if he also posted at FBG, I never posted there

He didn’t deserve to be killed for it, but Charlie didn’t build bridges.

There are probably 5x more righty than lefty posters here, and the righty posters here are about 10x more insufferable than a typical conservative I encounter in the real world. So yeah, 50:1 sounds about right.

Bump for start with Hello week next week. @Cdub100 is still a horrible human being.

I’ve done that on this forum also. Thanks for the reminder though to bump my Start with Hello thread which is next week to help combat bullying. Of course monsters like @Cdub100 have stated we need more bullying, not less. It’s okay, you can admit you were wrong. Be better.