TimHauck

I haven’t seen any others

Some interesting takes from Charlie Kirk to keep in mind for those saying rhetoric contributed to his death:

The MSNBC guy who else?

Depends on the Dem candidate. Not a Newsom fan. I’m undecided on Vance. If Stephen Miller is his VP candidate I’m not voting for him.

Anyone that I may have actually heard of before 2 days ago. I think that list is pretty short.

FFS, I was literally asking what he said. All I saw was the thing about saying it might have been someone shooting off their gun in celebration. Now I see some of the other comments.

Right before talking about the MSNBC guy you said (direct quote): “there have been a LOT of libs saying he deserves it, and I'm talking libs in government positions and in the media.”  Were you counting the MSNBC guy among those?

Did the MSNBC guy do anything besides suggest maybe he was killed by someone shooting off their gun in celebration? Dumb, but I wouldn’t call that celebrating his death. What other legitimate people in government and media?

They have. I haven’t seen anyone too notable do it, but there is a significant number of people that did. I just saw this post he made the day before being killed in doing a search, which I would say is another example of Kirk being hateful. But the comments are far worse (I’m sure many of them are not Americans though).

Well we have millions of Muslims in the US and I don’t think the US is dead

No hate here either?

Like I said, careful with his words

He did. I said before that I don’t have an issue with what I’ve seen from his college debates. But his x account was probably one of the most divisive out there among those with a million+ followers. Just one of the first examples I see. Saying a Muslim mayor is one of the biggest threats to our country is hateful. He posted about 9/11 and Mamdani in the same tweet to imply that people shouldn’t vote for Mamdani because of 9/11. He was careful with his words so he always had plausible deniability, but he was definitely hateful …but again, didn’t deserve to die for it.

He spread hate. Most commonly from what I saw against Muslims. ….but again, didn’t deserve to die for it.

Lol. One thing from 2004. Which is a lot more relevant of course for a middle aged man than a 22-year old. By “stuff,” you mean some flyers in his car and that one of the two politicians he shot voted once in a way that most Dems wouldn’t? That’s not serious. Boelter’s roommate said he was a Trump supporter and hater of Biden and Pelosi in 2025. Boelter’s list in 2025 included only Democrats.

Saying Charlie Kirk spreads hate is antifa ideology?

What antifa ideaology? “Take that, fascist” which could have been from a video game?

I agree the costume thing is stupid. And no, I’m not seeing much that would point to him being a conservative. The best evidence for him being a leftist is that he didn’t like Charlie Kirk. A lot of the other stuff doesn’t necessarily point to being a leftist, he could just be another in the long line of apolitical murderers

How about Boelter’s roommate saying in 2025 that he was a Trump supporter? Democrat plant paid by George Soros?

@jonnyutah said “These things go the same way every time. All recent things point to being a leftist.” I just wanted to make sure he was consistent and acknowledged that all the real evidence pointed to Boelter being a righty. Predictably, he was not consistent.

Do we know the political affiliation of that family member? Because if they didn’t specify which side radicalized the shooter, then it was probably the same one they align with.

But he’s a flaming leftist confirmed!!!!

He was registered as a Republican while living in Oklahoma. He filled out a survey in Minnesota saying he would “vote Republicans down the ticket.” All the names on the list were Democrats, and he also shot someone who voted for giving illegals free healthcare (even though multiple GC posters fell for the fake news about them both voting against it). His roommate said he was a Trump supporter, and didn’t like Biden or Pelosi. I haven’t seen good evidence he was “devoted to helping Africans,” he made a business selling stuff to them, could have been a scam. The flyers thing is nonsense, can easily be explained that he didn’t want others to have them or was trying to blend in. But hey, at least you didn’t bring up “appointed by Walz!” That’s progress at least.

Do you think he knew how to use Microsoft Word in 2003?

Refresh my memory. You did acknowledge that Vance Boelter was a Republican voter, correct?