TimHauck

1) I don’t have a side 2) The Minneapolis church shooter wanted a MAGA dude to be President

Yawn

You still don’t think Riley Gaines was calling Keith Olbermann gay as an insult? Better use those critical thinking skills you’re always talking about.

Bump

Whats the straw man? My whole point with that conversation is that when someone calls someone gay, like 99% of the time it’s meant as an insult.

I think you guys should tone down the rhetoric or else we might see more registered Republicans try to assassinate Trump.

Did they refer it on the moon? Already been discussed, she called this one a second home, so not as bad as Texas AG Ken Paxton with 3 primary residences. Second homes can legally be rented out. Good try, good effort though.

ToNe DoWn ThE rHeThOrIc

And yet your reasoning for saying she wasn’t devout is because she signed off on the name change…

Yawn

I don’t see how it would be, otherwise wouldn’t all the tariffs from other countries be illegal too? edit: or I guess they are just saying that Trump can’t decide to put them in place on his own, they have to go through Congress?

Huh? Just stating facts.

Well at least you admit that calling someone gay is almost always an insult, unlike @EternalShinyAndChrome, @TBayXXXVII, @Strike, and Riley Gaines.

You didn’t say this as an insult though, correct?

Yawn. Which part?

Another common theme with this mass shooting and many others: divorced parents

But how is telling them that considered “treatment”?

My last sentence there was always 100% correct. One year being the relevant timeframe for the mortgage has now been confirmed by Trump’s admin. Do you dispute either of those statements? If so, you’re wrong. The only thing that’s in question about my above post is the definition of primary residence, as I believe that can vary by state.

Better tell that to Strike and @supermike80 who think she used an excuse of a clerical error: For those that haven’t read the lawsuit, here is the phrase that is based on: ”the President’s concocted basis for removal—the unsubstantiated and unproven allegation that Governor Cook ‘potentially” erred in filling out a mortgage form prior to her Senate confirmation—does not amount to cause” https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/26078055/cooktrumpcomp082825.pdf And here is the admin response - notably they focus on the argument that simply an allegation is enough to show cause. I thought this phrase was interesting: “evidence of deceitful and potentially criminal conduct—plainly constitute cause.” If everyone in government got fired for “deceitful conduct” (of which it’s not even confirmed this is), there would be no one left. It also specifically states that the mortgages said she only needed to occupy the properties as her principal residence for 1 year (which I noted earlier in a previous post that you replied “nope” to). https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.284270/gov.uscourts.dcd.284270.13.0_1.pdf

My apologies, I was wrong. They didn’t attack the same spot twice. They attacked the same spot three times. https://edition.cnn.com/2025/08/27/middleeast/gaza-nasser-hospital-israel-attack-three-strikes-intl Can we all acknowledge Israel is committing war crimes yet? This of course was the simple statement I made that caused Jerryskids to challenge himself to see how many times he could say Hamas. And no, they weren’t targeting Hamas with this attack. They even admit they were targeting a “Hamas camera,” but it was a Reuters camera.

No, I only post about them targeting journalists when that’s what they actually did, of course it’s pretty common. Any comment on the recent one where they killed journalists and medical personnel by attacking the same spot at a hospital, twice?

What was a lie about that post? They weren’t required to put them in boys bathrooms, and most didn’t. All 15 of the districts that responded Friday to a CNN survey of 25 districts, including the Minneapolis and St. Paul districts in the state’s two most populous cities, said they comply with the law without providing tampons in traditional boys’ bathrooms. Kevin Burns, a spokesperson for Mankato Area Public Schools, the district where Walz was a high school teacher before entering politics, told CNN that schools there are satisfying “the letter and intent of the statute,” which Burns called “very clear,” by providing menstrual products in “traditional female and gender-neutral restrooms” as well as school nurses’ offices, not boys’ bathrooms. St. Cloud Area Schools provides free period products in female-only restrooms, designated gender-neutral restrooms, and from school health-care offices. Period products are not provided in male-only designated restrooms,” said Tami DeLand, a spokesperson for that district in central Minnesota. “We have provided free tampons and pads to all in ‘nongendered’ student restrooms and girls’ restrooms for grades 4 and up. They are also available from health staffers. We do not have menstrual products in boys’ bathrooms,” said Toya Stewart Downey, a spokesperson for the Robbinsdale district in the suburbs of Minneapolis. “The Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools provides menstrual products in girls’ bathrooms and gender-neutral bathrooms, not boys’ bathrooms,” said Tony Taschner, a spokesperson for the Twin Cities-area suburban district. “If we are aware of transgender students who need menstrual products and use the boys’ bathrooms, school staff would work with these students individually on a case-by-case basis.” Scott Croonquist, executive director of Minnesota’s Association of Metropolitan School Districts, which says its 52 member districts educate more than half of public school students in the state, said Friday: “Our interpretation of the law is the same as what you have heard from the people you have talked to in school districts. The law does NOT require menstrual products in boys’ bathrooms.” Jim Skelly, spokesperson for the large Anoka-Hennepin school district, said, “menstrual products are not provided in male-gendered bathrooms in our school district.” Instead, he said, its schools provide the products “in alignment with the state law in single-stall, all-gender bathrooms and in female-gendered bathrooms at the middle school and high school level. These products are also available from health professionals in the building at all levels.” “Just as with Anoka-Hennepin, the free products are not found in traditional male-only bathrooms in Osseo Area Schools,” said a spokesperson for the Osseo Area district near Minneapolis, Clay Sawatzke, said on Friday. “But they are provided free to all in girls’ bathrooms and in single stall/universal bathrooms.” “Rochester Public Schools is fully compliant with MN Statute 121A.212. Free menstrual products are provided in our gender neutral and girls’ bathrooms, or available from health staff,” said a spokesperson for that district in the state’s third-most-populous city. “Minneapolis Public Schools purchased and installed menstrual product dispensers in all assigned female bathrooms and near all gender-neutral bathrooms,” said district spokesperson Donnie Belcher. “Free menstrual products are available in girls’ bathrooms, non-gendered bathrooms and in school health offices,” said Amy Parnell, spokesperson for the Wayzata Public Schools suburban district near Minneapolis. St. Paul Public Schools spokesperson Erica Wacker said, “Locations for dispensers and receptacles for pads and tampons include non-gendered single stall toilets, such as in main offices; toilets in the health offices; group toilets for girls; and one-third of the individual toilet rooms in buildings that have inclusive restrooms.”

She said more officers in general = less crime. She wants more police officers

I guess the mother was a devout Catholic after all

I suppose the answer is “tell them they’re not a woman?” Not sure that will do much.