TimHauck

For the record:

You guys are strange. I was proven right.

Kids are sleeping, just got back from a run with the dog and enjoying an Italian ice and my W from this thread.

Thanks for acknowledging that you think taking a cartoon man off a logo is lefty bullsh1t.

Fat Darrell

Well they didn’t say they were going to repaint the walls again

L? The fact that they’re changing it back proves me correct

I cared that other people (including the President, apparently) cared.

Yes. To report that people, conservatives especially, were mad about Cracker Barrel changing their logo. Which has now been confirmed. Thanks for stopping by.

Weird, I was told people didn’t actually care about this

Has Harrison Butker told her to retire to be a stay at home mom yet?

Did I ever say that journalists based in Gaza weren’t biased? I’ve mostly just said that they’re the only ones allowed to be there other than on Israel-sponsored propaganda tours, so they’re really the only accounting we have of what’s going on. I’ve specifically said that if Israel allowed western journalists in there freely that maybe we’d have a clearer picture of what’s happening. But Occam’s razor tells us that Israel doesn’t want the world to see what’s happening from people other than Palestinian journalists that they can just kill and say they were Hamas. Of course it should go without saying, but it probably needs to be said for you, that even if they are biased, that doesn’t mean they’re Hamas or that it’s okay to kill them.

Oh sorry, I forgot that if they are sympathetic towards the folks living in Gaza, that means they are Hamas

Israel says a Reuters camera was Hamas, and Reuters repeats it.

Which begs the question…Would GC righties consider a beard grooming club to be feminine? Another tranny thread?

Oh hey it’s just Strike being a hypocrite again, lying about what other people said

lol no it’s not. And let’s not forget that even many Israelis don’t even agree with what Netanyahu is doing.

I’d still say people are conflating the arguments. I think it went something like this: 1. A bunch of people (on both sides) say they miss the old decor, but no real “outrage” initially (apparently some of the changes started a few months ago) 2. A bunch of conservatives in particular say that taking the white guy off the logo and changing some of the stuff on the walls was woke 3. Some other conservatives say that’s dumb, I don’t really like it but it’s not woke 4. Some of the people from point #2, determined to prove themselves right, scour the Cracker Barrel website and local charities to dig up that they support inclusion, have sponsored a pride event, and have painted some rocking chairs the color of the rainbow (ah!!), then say, see, that means changing the logo really was woke!!! They may have done other “woke” things, but the majority of the backlash is because of the logo and rebrand, which is not woke.

It’s funny that almost all of the people on Fox News etc that I’ve seen complain about the logo have said that they’ve never eaten at a Cracker Barrel. So somehow Cracker Barrel is turning their backs on straight white folk, yet they haven’t managed to get many of them to eat there in the past. Sounds like the rebrand was the right idea.

Thank you for acknowledging that you think the logo change by itself is woke. Lol.

Link?

The term DEI hire implies she got the job despite not being qualified. She was plenty qualified.

I mean there are elected officials voting not to give Israel weapons.

I’d respect him more if he’d just admit to doing it on purpose. That world certainly shut his lapdog Jerryskids up. Well I guess it wouldn’t, he’d just say that was necessary because Hamas.