TimHauck

Yeah this is in reference to the court order Strike previously brought up but was wrong about, and then forgot that he brought it up.

I guess you missed that I added allegedly. We do know for sure that Israel killed more journalists and medical personnel with this incident. Any comment?

As long as they don’t put him in a prison like last time, or drop him in the middle of the jungle or something, does it matter where he goes? Couldn’t he get a flight somewhere else?

2 weeks to slow the spread!

Correct me if I’m wrong here but your comment about trying to be a restaurant for everyone was specific to in the past. By saying they’re “doubling down on the same target market” now, I thought you were implying that you think the new strategy isn’t really to be a restaurant for everyone. I know I mentioned they didn’t say they were catering ONLY to blacks but maybe focusing on them the most, so maybe that’s what you were saying. You also said “If blacks were already their largest market (possibly by a wide margin) and the business was failing, doubling down on the same target market is not likely a winning strategy.” My point in response to that was to say I don’t think they did anything to drive away blacks specifically. So I do think that trying to get back the customers that were their largest market to begin with, probably is a winning strategy (if they do it right of course).

I’m no Red Lobster expert but here’s a rare well researched CNN article with some background on what went wrong previously: https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/03/food/red-lobster-seafood-restaurant-bankruptcy/index.html It seems a lot of their troubles can be traced back to first being sold to private equity, and then being sold to their largest supplier (it was their idea for permanent endless shrimp). So I’d doubt blacks stopped eating there at a higher rate than any other group, in which case it would make sense to spend effort trying to get them back specifically. But I didn’t get the impression from the article that they didn’t want to be a place for everyone anyway.

Probably worth noting that when even Max O is saying it doesn’t look good, you know this is not an uncommon opinion…

She does probably weigh more than him, and obviously is more athletic. I’d like to see a video of Trump benching, that would be interesting.

Last month you thought there was. There wasn’t. Will you admit you were wrong?

I especially like how he said he responded to me, except he didn’t lol.

Imagine what the sky screamers here would be saying about Biden if he thought the photoshopped letters M-S-1-3 were actually tattooed on his hand…

The most logical explanation for it that I’ve seen is something to the effect of “smoke weed to get high, love Jesus until I die”

Doesn’t want the members of the board that are too stupid to realize they’re both him to think he’s a life loser. AKA the peefoam/jbycho strategy

Now they’re even adding “child predator” to the list of definitive accusations lol. The lawsuit payout to his wife is going to be yuge. Speaking of child predators, have they released the Epstein files yet?

Noem still calling him definitively a gang member. Doubling down on your mistakes is not a great look

If you click on it provides the translation. Here ya go: Source in Southern Command: "Another strike will be carried out to ensure that rescue efforts do not take place. First aid providers, rescuers - kill them. Attack again, on them. This is the procedure. Since October 7, it has been in place."

Allegedly directly told to kill first responders:

Happened live on air IDF statement: "Earlier today (Monday), IDF troops carried out a strike in the area of Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis. "The Chief of the General Staff instructed to conduct an initial inquiry as soon as possible. "The IDF regrets any harm to uninvolved individuals and does not target journalists as such. The IDF acts to mitigate harm to uninvolved individuals as much as possible while maintaining the safety of IDF troops."

But but all the journalists were Hamas!

I recapped the timeline of our prior conversation in the post below. You didn’t respond, you ignored it like you usually do when you’re wrong, which is often.

You were wrong. You previously said there was a court order preventing them from deporting him to a different country. There wasn’t, and then hilariously you forgot you ever said that.

Yes, he didn’t say they were ONLY catering to blacks. But every time I’ve been in one it’s been over 50% blacks, they’re definitely their largest market so it would make sense to focus on them the most.

Who said he was only catering to a single race?

I guess that’s a no.

According to many conservatives, yes.