TimHauck

I think Strike thinks it’s okay that he was sent to a terrorist prison for it

Well yes I do think it’s a good thing if our elected officials aren’t pedos, don’t you?

He broke the law by being in the country illegally, and he probably was a type of under the table uber driver for illegals

An odd reason to hate all gay people

“FULL EXONERATION” buddy

Well she exonerated Clinton according to @Tree of Knowledge

Maybe that will be the cope when Maxwell gets pardoned…Epstein was innocent the whole time?

Probably not a bad deal TBH and would save the taxpayers money. Hopefully after they do that they deport the convicted human trafficker they let roam the streets to testify against Abrego Garcia.

What does this have to do with Epstein?

Any charges yet? Have they released the Epstein files?

Probably worth noting that the rebrand does include new menu items, including apparently bringing back items that had previously been removed. People seem to think they’re completely changing their strategy but they’re really not. https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/articles/cracker-barrel-just-dropped-fall-180000924.html

Grape Fanta

Why do you hate gay people?

Yawn

I look forward to people saying this exonerates Trump but not Clinton

I’m just glad to know Bill Clinton is innocent.

I was joking

Oh ok, so since there are American criminals as well, that means Americans overall are “insane and bloodthirsty”? Also ironic considering it’s very possible the video you’re referencing was actually people protecting the aid from being stolen by Hamas.

As I mentioned earlier, this post might be the biggest self-own in GC history. The hilarious part is the reason for the posts on 7/25 was that I was agreeing with your prior posts saying they could have deported him elsewhere, in replying to @RLLD and saying that the current trial was political theater. You responded saying (direct quote, nice “serious discussion” btw): “No they can't. For someone supposedly knowledgeable about the issue you just made a very ignorant statement. Is that what Billy told you?” That’s when I quoted one of your posts from a few months prior saying they could have, and then you made the post above about the court order saying they couldn’t (and I know that’s what your caveat above is trying to allude to). But for one, even if there was a court order saying that, I thought it was obvious I was saying they could have deported him INSTEAD of the trial, the only reason there was a court order at all was because of the trial. In addition, the court order didn’t even say they couldn’t do it: So, will Strike apologize and admit he was wrong?

Oh ok so you were just adding commentary that is irrelevant to the thread, got it.

Strike will comment that you linked to Al Jazeera and ignore the importance of the story. Or maybe he won’t because he usually only complains about the source if a non-conservative posts it. Obviously this is not to say that all Jews are pedos or something stupid like that. But the fact that this guy works under Netanyahu, and Netanyahu’s office lied about what happened, makes it a pretty big story.

I’ve asked you that multiple times in a serious discussion and you’ve yet to answer. Your previous post might be the biggest self-own in GC history, but I don’t have time to bump your other posts showing why right now.

At least you’re honest. It’s telling that Strike won’t answer that.

First you yell at me for tagging you. Then you yell at me for not quoting you and using quotation marks to repeat what you say, but accidentally adding “on” to a direct quote that you said which did not change the meaning at all. Now you yell at me for quoting you, but not providing a link to the post? You’re a little girl and I’m not going to play your games.

I will, if you answer the following question: Do you think being in the US illegally should be punishable by being sent to a terrorist prison?