TimHauck

The answer is no. /thread

Sure, sounds like it can maybe help increase rainfall by 5-10% if they’re lucky and in a small area. It’s not “weaponizing the weather” or “weather warfare” and it didn’t cause the Texas flood.

Who said that?

I’m sure most here don’t care about liberal cities, but lots of interesting things going on here IMO. First of all you’ve got the disgraced Andrew Cuomo who had previously been in the lead. After killing old folks during covid and the sexual harassment allegations, I’m surprised he has so much support. But his main competition is Zohran Mandami, who doesn’t have much experience and is a socialist. He also supports boycotting Israeli products and has called their actions in Gaza genocide, so with the recent Iran situation you’ve got crazies like Laura Loomer calling him a “jihadist.” Lastly there’s Brad Lander who of course recently gained fame but really has no chance (so for that reason I still don’t believe he wanted to get arrested). He’s also been endorsing Mandami though, and may have succeeded in getting more support for him, as he has taken a lead in polls for the first time. Worth noting that Lander is Jewish, yet endorsing Mandami, so I thought this point about not equating Jews with Israel was interesting. https://x.com/ryangrim/status/1937133684693287281

@jerryskids how was your class? Figured this deserved it’s own thread. I think yes. on this subject, this tweet from 2 days ago went viral and of course all the conservative x posters jumped all over it. I also think it’s odd the guy is bragging about being the “IQ record holder” https://x.com/yhbryankimiq/status/1935171190827667641

I don’t know this to be true, but Biden sniffed a girl once

Why should kids have to pay for the stupid decisions of their parents? There’s a white privilege analogy in there, but I’ll leave it alone because I know @EternalShinyAndChrome will call it a strawman

So among all that evidence, there weren’t any other names listed?

I do appreciate that even the right is calling them out on this: https://x.com/Acyn/status/1942278429635928130

Possibly, but that statement also calls out how stupid it is for people to say “BuT hAmAs WaS eLeCtEd!1!1!1”

You’re still arguing semantics by saying “dur it was a warning shot!” As if that somehow means it’s impossible it could have killed someone. I even specifically said earlier that I didn’t think they were “trying” to kill anyone. But yes, you got me, there doesn’t appear to be any video of a uniformed IDF soldier killing someone at an aid site. But there are multiple allegations even from Israeli sources that it happened, so it’s silly for you to suggest that since there isn’t a specific video of it that it definitely didn’t happen, especially since you believe the “this photo of grenade shells is from Hamas attacking other Palestinians!” I hadn’t looked for videos since the earlier part of the thread though, since I know you are working from a model that you believe anything the IDF says, so anything I post will be either “probably Hamas” or “an accident.” But again, not sure why you are hung up on the aid site thing, that was just one of the examples I posted. I guess I should have stopped trying to show you evidence after I showed Israel admitting to blowing up an ambulance and you actually believed the IDF when they claimed it was “an accident.” I also never said they intentionally killed 200 journalists, I said that’s the number that died, which includes some that were probably killed in collateral damage and some that probably were Hamas. The three in the photo were specifically targeted and were not Hamas though, despite the IDF claims about one of them. I’m sure there are more but I’m not looking up any more because you’ll just say they’re Hamas.

I wasn’t trying to debate the warning shot thing, I was asking if you thought they were fired towards the crowd. When you said yes, I was asking if you thought they could have hit someone. You never answered, and instead joined into @Strike’s semantics game. Which is weird since you usually criticize me for that, yet here you are trying to debate the difference between “towards” and “at.” I never said it was a “murderous shooting spree,” in fact I specifically said what I think happened is they fired “warning shots” that killed people, but they didn’t particularly care. This is corroborated by the recent audio obtained by the AP, although that one was an American. There are multiple IDF whistleblowers who allege this as well, including in the original link I shared which was from an Israeli newspaper. I also never said they intentionally killed hundreds of innocent journalists. They definitely killed some though. There is a recently released documentary detailing their targeting of doctors. And keep in mind, there is a practical reason for targeting journalists and doctors, and not just because Hamas is hiding under hospitals. But I know you’ll say as you already have that everything was either an accident or Hamas did it. Speaking of, I do still find it funny that you won’t believe Israel did anything wrong without video, but then shared the post saying “look at these grenade shells! They were definitely from a Hamas attack on other Palestinians!” Lol. As a Jew myself, it pains me to point out that Israel has committed war crimes. But they have, and I’m pretty confident in saying that I bet 50 years from now people will likely look at the IDF’s actions during this war a little differently.

I don’t know if it was hundreds. But it happened and it was intentional.

Israel intentionally killed doctors and journalists.

Yeah, I know a warning shot isn’t supposed to kill anyone. But you’re also not supposed to intentionally kill journalists and doctors in war, yet here we are.

Synonyms of at at preposition Definition of at as in along Related Words Relevance along across beside near alongside around towards

Then I probably wouldn’t consider that as shooting “towards” the crowd

Ok, and if they fired warning shots towards the crowd, isn’t it likely that they probably hit someone?

I’m betting he is @Walker

Better watch out, looks like digby is back and he’s the biggest reporter here, there are often others that get caught up in his reporting sprees

Yup, stupid thing to say. Funny how righties here don’t care when people on x with hundreds of thousands of followers say vile sh1t, but all of the sudden care when some random pediatrician does.

Haven’t followed this at all but I listen to Breaking Points and they interviewed Turtleboy as well

He does seem unnecessarily angry overall. He was correct about his original post to Gaines though. Being critical of the Israeli government isn’t antisemitism

Sounds kinda like digby.

So you admit calling him gay was a slight. That means she thinks being gay is a negative thing. Not rocket science.