TimHauck

I’m sure most here don’t care about liberal cities, but lots of interesting things going on here IMO. First of all you’ve got the disgraced Andrew Cuomo who had previously been in the lead. After killing old folks during covid and the sexual harassment allegations, I’m surprised he has so much support. But his main competition is Zohran Mandami, who doesn’t have much experience and is a socialist. He also supports boycotting Israeli products and has called their actions in Gaza genocide, so with the recent Iran situation you’ve got crazies like Laura Loomer calling him a “jihadist.” Lastly there’s Brad Lander who of course recently gained fame but really has no chance (so for that reason I still don’t believe he wanted to get arrested). He’s also been endorsing Mandami though, and may have succeeded in getting more support for him, as he has taken a lead in polls for the first time. Worth noting that Lander is Jewish, yet endorsing Mandami, so I thought this point about not equating Jews with Israel was interesting. https://x.com/ryangrim/status/1937133684693287281

Glory

They’re not democrats either

NY Post: former classmates say shooter often drew pictures of swastikas and guns https://nypost.com/2025/07/01/us-news/idaho-firefighter-shooter-wess-roley-had-nazi-tendencies-ex-classmates-say/?utm_campaign=nypost&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social

Happy 4th of July to you too!

What lies did I post? I don’t promote hate, I call it out.

Why did she have to be placed on paid leave less than a month after giving birth? Why wasn’t she already on paid maternity leave?

Happy 4th of July! On this day of independence, we must remember things that truly make America great, like our constitution

No such thing as a forward thinking racist

I am curious though if any righties here are going to save @RLLD any further embarrassment by pointing out how wrong he is about claiming Abrego Garcia’s lawyers admitted he was in MS-13. It is fun to watch him flail though.

Why would you assume that? I “responded” to you! I just chose not to answer that part because it was a stupid question that is blatantly obvious. You're right @Meglamaniac, this board is so bad that people are now demanding evidence of things that are blatantly obvious. But if you insist @Strike, and since I did appreciate you calling out @Maximum Overkill in the other thread, here ya go: 1) Senator Van Hollen confirmed the glasses were placed on the table after the meeting had already started, which he says can be confirmed with video, and that neither he nor Abrego Garcia drank any of them, which can also be confirmed by the full rim of salt still present. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sen-van-hollen-pours-cold-water-margarita-gate-photo-op-el-salvador-trip-nobody-drank 2) Senator Van Hollen also stated that they put less liquid in Abrego Garcia’s glass to make it look like he had drank from it, and they initially wanted to have the meeting by the pool. Interestingly Fox News left these comments out of their article https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5256589-van-hollen-abrego-garcia-margarita/ 3) Being clear, there’s a good chance they were water and not even margaritas 4) Bukele himself was the one that posted the photo and has even commented since about “margaritas,” evidence it was staged: https://x.com/nayibbukele/status/1913028548001923259 https://x.com/nayibbukele/status/1931084729840800096

At this place, yes Edit: sorry I missed the joke, carry on. To answer the question, I prefer actual shows

This is a joke, right?

Wow, thank you @Strike for finally being someone on the right to call out Maximum Tranny polluting the board

The first dated photos here were from 4/15. He arrived at CECOT 3/15 and specifically cited that his 31-pound weight loss occurred in the first 2 weeks. He was transferred to a different facility on April 10th, surely where the later photos are from, which would give them some time for him to gain some of the weight back. He even stated that the day before being transferred they took a staged photograph of him with better food. So congrats, you fell for more obvious propaganda. And to be clear, I don’t know for sure he was tortured, and he probably wasn’t once he became famous. But these photos/videos don’t prove anything. However, Occam’s Razor would tell you that if you send someone to a prison known for torturing people, there’s a good chance they get tortured. Occam’s Razor would also tell you that once Abrego Garcia became famous, they wouldn’t want him to be tortured, and sending him somewhere else would be an easy way to accomplish that. Side note: I did just skim through his complaint. What I found most interesting was how he stated he arrived with 20 other Salvadorans. One week after arriving at CECOT, they (and he even named a specific person) separated 12 people with gang tattoos from 9 without them. Abrego Garcia was in the group without them. The “evidence” he was in MS-13 is getting worse and worse.

So you’re pretty sure he wasn’t tortured, right?

You forgot to login as @BrahmaBulls, @HellToupee

Holy fock, you’re as bad as @EternalShinyAndChrome. Is it your contention now that saying “government propaganda?” with a laughing emoji (twice) isn’t saying that you don’t believe it was propaganda?

Except they didn’t. But if you can show us where exactly they did, and not a line from a BBC article, then I will admit I was wrong.

Can you please tell us what page and on what court filing Abrego Garcia’s lawyers admitted he was in MS-13? Thanks in advance.

You know if I did what @EternalShinyAndChrome is doing to me to him he’d call me a “child” or something. But back on topic, I still can’t believe @Strike didn’t know the “margaritas” were propaganda. Lololol, and this guy is claiming “I” was having a bad week.

This is going to be fun “responding” to @Strike in the future though

Ok you got me! He “responded.” But if he’s going to continue posting in this thread, I’m going to periodically bump my question to him.

If he’s going to claim I’m “making things up,” he should at least clarify his opinion. He didn’t because he knows I correctly characterized his opinion.

Ok so you consider it a “response” if someone completely avoids the question. Noted for future reference.