Proteus71

I really hope you are being sarcastic.

Can't remember the year, but I had the 1.12 and 2.1: Took V. Testaverde and A. Freeman (can't remember who was first).

Do you know something that the weather forecasters don't know or was this just a matter of being a post that's a couple of days old?

Do you think scouts will see McFadden in the same light as yourself and we'll see McFadden slide on draft day?

I think LB is hard to gauge cause they have so many duties. Couldn't Bishop play Mike, move Hawk to Sam and Barnett to Will? Barnett's size would indicate (along with what seemed to be probs shedding blocks from OL) he would be better on the weak side. But I guess size is not the only thing to consider (like speed and cover abilities). BTW, Barnett is like 232 lbs and Hwak/Bishop are mid 240's.

As far as safety goes, are you guys saying FS or SS? As far as I know they are not really interchangeable right? FS is more of a cover guy where SS is more of a run stopper (who also needs to cover)? If this is true why is Rouse a FS? He's as big as many LB'ers so why is he not a SS? Someone please educate me.

Milwaukee local news/weather said about -15 with the wind chill in GB on Sunday.

Alot of these types of posts seem to have a wierd resemblance. Do people really think that just because GB fans think their team will/should win, that the Packers are going to overlook the Giants? Like the team reads these posts and sees most people choosing GB to win, so the Packers are going to start gearing up for the Patriots today.

The 15th is the deadline to declare for the draft, so this list would be easier after that day. However, if all the big time junior RB's declare (not including Slaton), then I see this as an extremely strong RB class.

Mendenhall, RB, Ill

Hey, Blitz Brigade (I think that was your team name). This league is still up and running. We play thru MFL and have our forums at another site. This site is just not stable enough. It was tough when it went down for all those weeks awhile back. The only reason I stopped by here was to check the old rule book.

This is not a New England area league, atleast I hope not since I live in Milwaukee and am in the league. 1st dibs goes out to a member with a high number of QUALITY posts, so I'm afraid you're way down the list. PS dibs part not to be taken seriously

Hmmm, nothing better than brats and beer in the parking lot before watching the Packers whoop up on the Bears!

From what I've read, supposedly it's Culpepper, which I don't understand. Unless GB management figures they have seen enough of Rodgers, and he is not the future. Cpep takes over the reigns when Favre retires next year.

Minor detail. It's the first pick that I like. A. Peterson meat Rouse. <----- A.P. running into Rouse

How about Rouse, SS, Virginia Tech?

Ah, I think I get it. I thought they were stating that Jackson was who many were thinking the Pack would take in the 1st. I understand now (apparently, I'm a tad on the slow side).

Huh?

You haven't seen anything yet. Next year TT can trade those annoying picks in rounds 1-6, for all 32 7th round picks. Now that's quantity. Seriously though, I don't watch much college, so I can't put a value on rookies. However, I would think the earlier the player is picked the better chance they have of being a good player. Oh well, I will give TT the benefit of the doubt for now, and believe he has a plan.

It's one thing if the Packers front office feels they can get some good years out of these players if a trade somehow happened, but to do it for 1 last hurrah for Favre? HELL NO!

MMMMMMMM! Pabst.

Good stuff. Though I wonder how this rates against other LB'ers pay (both OLB and MLB), which could be a queue as to whether Barnett might get moved to the outside (I'm assuming MLB tend to get more money than OLB).

Here's to hoping the Packers can find a decent TE!

The unsportsman like conduct on Harrison for spiking the ball after the TD was a stupid call.