GameDay Guru 1 Posted May 21, 2003 I agree Smith isn't a huge guy but I figure if he can grab 80 balls (which I think he will since they don't have a solid second wr), the point per reception will score me some points. That and I wasn't sure how many carries Hearst will get with Barlow coming on strong. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted May 21, 2003 Originally posted by joeyjoejoe:He would fit nicely in Dallas when Hambrick falls on his fat ass. Hey I would gladly sacrifice Hambrick to have Barlow get all the carries next year ! that would suit me just fine ! Would give me 3 top 10 pottential RB's. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DIVINE DESTRUCTION 0 Posted May 21, 2003 its a good thing maybe you can dig yourself out of that hole you dug yourself Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted May 21, 2003 Emmitt Smith was taken -- hilarity Actually he was the best RB left ! But YUCK ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wuerffel for MVP 0 Posted May 21, 2003 Every RB is a "potential top 10 rb" this is football remember? Every year there are 2 or 3 suprises at RB (this year it was Portis, Deuce, and Henry). Next year who knows. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeyjoejoe 0 Posted May 21, 2003 For me it was between Hearst and Emmitt.... Kind of a no brainer! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted May 21, 2003 Originally posted by Wuerffel for MVP:Every RB is a "potential top 10 rb" this is football remember? Every year there are 2 or 3 suprises at RB (this year it was Portis, Deuce, and Henry). Next year who knows. Disagree Duece wasn't a surprise ! He was taken in almost every draft by the end of the 3rd round -- mostly in the mid 2nd. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
christgs80 0 Posted May 21, 2003 Emmitt= terrible pick but I need him to feel in for my bye weeks, and I do actually think McGinnis will give him every opportunity to carry 20-25 times a game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wuerffel for MVP 0 Posted May 21, 2003 Originally posted by joeyjoejoe:For me it was between Hearst and Emmitt.... Kind of a no brainer! Actually I probably would have taken Emitt first. At least you know he'll be the man in Arizona...although that may not be saying much. One thing they do have there is some serious heffers on the O-line. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted May 21, 2003 Only Back RB's reamin after 6 rounds. :eek: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GameDay Guru 1 Posted May 21, 2003 DD, you still considering the trade? It really impacts what my next move is here at 7.3. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wuerffel for MVP 0 Posted May 21, 2003 Originally posted by The Moz: Disagree Duece wasn't a surprise ! He was taken in almost every draft by the end of the 3rd round -- mostly in the mid 2nd. Getting drafted in the 2nd-3rd round and coming out 6th in scoring is a surprise! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
singman 0 Posted May 21, 2003 Originally posted by The Moz:Emmitt Smith was taken -- hilarity Actually he was the best RB left ! But YUCK ! I was counting on Emmitt as my Bye week fill in. Now with him gone you and I will be talking trade! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DIVINE DESTRUCTION 0 Posted May 21, 2003 I am going to consider it right now. By the way no way was portis or duece a suprise last year. If you knew anything, you knew portis was the best sleeper in last years draft with vick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wuerffel for MVP 0 Posted May 21, 2003 Originally posted by DIVINE DESTRUCTION:I am going to consider it right now. By the way no way was portis or duece a suprise last year. If you knew anything, you knew portis was the best sleeper in last years draft with vick Suck it Trebeck! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
