Mandatory DLs (Diesel07)

[Zap 0]

I've been on the physically unable to post list for a couple days.

 

BUT, having looked over this week's matchups I did notice an illegal roster set for this weekend.

 

So, once again, we start:

 

1 DL

1 LB

1 DB

2 DFlex

 

If you fail to follow this set up then I will delete your highest scoring defender. That's the rule. Fail to start 1dl or 1lb or 1db and overload another position and you will only score four defenders by my deleting the best one. Because Yahoo doesn't diferentiate LBs from DLs, doesn't mean we don't. wink

 

 

code:

The cheater is actually playing the commish.  Go figure?  

---

[Diesel07 0]

ok, let me go check it out........FIXED!

[t.j 35]

Zap:

If you fail to follow this set up then I will delete your highest scoring defender.

Shouldn't it be just the highest-scoring linebacker?

[Zap 0]

t.j:

Zap:

If you fail to follow this set up then I will delete your highest scoring defender.

Shouldn't it be just the highest-scoring linebacker?

Not necessarily. If someone started three LBs and 2DBs and one of the DBs was high scorer, well that DB is deleted, because we can technically start three LBs. However, you bring up a good point for clarity. The highest scoring "offending" defender will be deducted. So, if someone snuck in 4 LBs and only one DB then the DB is kosher and the highest scoring LB is gone. Make sense?

[t.j 35]

Zap:

t.j:

Zap:

If you fail to follow this set up then I will delete your highest scoring defender.

Shouldn't it be just the highest-scoring linebacker?

Not necessarily. If someone started three LBs and 2DBs and one of the DBs was high scorer, well that DB is deleted, because we can technically start three LBs. However, you bring up a good point for clarity. The highest scoring "offending" defender will be deducted. So, if someone snuck in 4 LBs and only one DB then the DB is kosher and the highest scoring LB is gone. Make sense?

It makes sense but I think it's the DL position that's the offending position, not the D position. Therefore in your scenario I would advocate keeping the two DBs and benching the highest-scoring LB.