Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Guest SheVegas

Help A Lady PLEASE

Recommended Posts

Guest SheVegas

I am in a 12 person league. Points are given for receptions, yards and touchdowns. I start one QB 2 running backs. 3 any combination of wr/ te's.

I have Bledsoe and Favre

RB's- L.J., Ahman Green, Reggie Bush

WR's/TE-T.O. Hines Ward, Todd Heap, J-Shockley, K. Winslow

 

I am leaning towards Bledsoe, Green, Bush, T.O., Ward, and Heap

 

Thank You

Ginger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ginger,

 

How you doin?

 

Seriously...sit Green, play LJ. Sit Heap, play Shockey.

 

Hope that helps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am in a 12 person league. Points are given for receptions, yards and touchdowns. I start one QB 2 running backs. 3 any combination of wr/ te's.

I have Bledsoe and Favre

RB's- L.J., Ahman Green, Reggie Bush

WR's/TE-T.O. Hines Ward, Todd Heap, J-Shockley, K. Winslow

 

I am leaning towards Bledsoe, Green, Bush, T.O., Ward, and Heap

 

Thank You

Ginger

 

 

Well, I cant think of any reason why you wouldnt start Larry Johnson. hes the best RB you have.

 

I'd start LJ and Bush this week.

 

you may eventually want to look at dropping a TE in favour of a WR. WR's will generally get you more points than TE's...

 

but based on the choices presented(assuming all are healthy), I'd start TO, Ward, and either Shockey or Heap (I'd take Heap... but if you dont know....flip a coin, they both produce similar numbers most of the time)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't bench LJ. He had a "down" week and they will probably lean on him more. Unless he gets banged up or the Chiefs start looking like the Raiders, you can't sit someone you picked that high. Other than that it looks pretty good. I'd personally lean towards shockey over heap. Oakland will probably be gettting killed, and early, so Baltimore could be running a lot after halftime, which also means Heap could be blocking more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest SheVegas

Thanks guys...I just see the Broncos playing tough at home, and all they will have to do is focus on stopping L.J. and I am scared they will this week. I am not benching LJ for the year, I just think this week will be the week Bush goes bananas and we see him running through the swiss cheese of GB on espn. I also think Green will score twice and run for 100 yards. I am serious thinking of now starting TO, Ward and Winslow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bledsoe, LJ, Bush, TO, Ward and Winslow

Watch injuries: Heap and Shockley might not play. If they play I'd go with Heap instead of Winslow.

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=232655

 

 

Bledsoe, LJ, Bush, TO, Ward, Heap (watch for injury status and if not looking good go with Winslow if Shockey isn't looking any better)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bledsoe, LJ, Bush, TO, Ward, Heap (watch for injury status and if not looking good go with Winslow if Shockey isn't looking any better)

 

Ditto.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey -

I would go Bledsoe, LJ (never sit a stud unless he is hurt), Bush, TO, Ward, Heap (if totally healthy...if not then go with Shocky...then Winslow)

 

Thanks for answering mine :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NEVER SIT LJ!!!!!!!

saying that i would have to go with Bled, LJ, Bush, TO, Ward and as far as wr3/te I would say Shock. I know Heap is playing OAK but Bal will run all day (IE SD MNF). In a better game where points are going to be scored I like Shock. (PPR) is why I say Bush as well.

 

Thanks for mine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for answering mine! :cry:

 

I'd personally go with

 

Bledsoe

LJ

Bush (in PPR leagues he can be a monster!)

T.O.

Ward

Winslow (Frye loves going to him so he might get you some red zone TD's and plenty of reception pts)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×