bobpate17 0 Posted September 15, 2006 A gives J wiggins, F gore and Moulds B gives Jordan, gonzalez is this trade fair? which side wins? team B WR L. Evans N. Burleson J. horn RBs L jordan J lewis D rhodes Team A WR Driver Wayne Stallworth Mould RB Jackson R brown Gore M. Barber III Thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Killer Elite 0 Posted September 15, 2006 great deal for whoever geta Jordan and Gonzalez. This is the old throw in an extra player to get value trick. If you have Jordan dont fall for it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theyhateme 0 Posted September 15, 2006 team A wins big time. this is not a fair trade! wiggins should be someones bye week tightend, moulds has some upside in houston, and gore had 1 big game against arizona. gonzalez is still a top 3 tight end and jordan can be a top 10 back. i dont think i would veto this trade this early in the season but i dont think its a fair trade. thanks for mine Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boomer_Sooner 0 Posted September 15, 2006 Team A would be getting the worse deal unless TE's score really big in your league (i.e. one point for every 5 yards). Team A would be getting Jordan. I know it has been one game but the whole team is a fantasy mistake, even Moss. I say if you are team B, make the trade, and if Team A, don't. Thanks for replying to mine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cervante 0 Posted September 15, 2006 Team A would be getting the worse deal unless TE's score really big in your league (i.e. one point for every 5 yards). Team A would be getting Jordan. I know it has been one game but the whole team is a fantasy mistake, even Moss. I say if you are team B, make the trade, and if Team A, don't. Thanks for replying to mine. I would have to agree Boomer Sooner. If you have to play a TE then i would do it. As far as Oakland goes,I have Randy Moss and i'm almost afraid to play him right now. That team is a mess. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bobpate17 0 Posted September 15, 2006 I would have to agree Boomer Sooner. If you have to play a TE then i would do it. As far as Oakland goes,I have Randy Moss and i'm almost afraid to play him right now. That team is a mess. even if I get jordan he would be my #3 RB. and we only start 2 rbs. I will almost always start jackson and brown and if jordan come back then great otherwise o well. I get great TE out of the deal. my TE sucks. and I can trade jordan later if I want. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
beantownbrown 0 Posted September 15, 2006 I think it's certainly not a trade you can veto. After Jordan's bad outing and Gore's stellar outing of course this is a case of two guys who's recent performance drastically has effected their stock. This deal really will be won by whoever is better between the two backs. Personally I would say Jordan and Gonzo is the better situation for your team. Moulds is just a throw in and likely will not be anything more than a #3 WR or bye week guy at best. If I were team B, I would ask for Stallworth, Gore, and Wiggins for Jordan and Gonzo. That is more fair and team B needs help at WR. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boomer_Sooner 0 Posted September 15, 2006 even if I get jordan he would be my #3 RB. and we only start 2 rbs. I will almost always start jackson and brown and if jordan come back then great otherwise o well. I get great TE out of the deal. my TE sucks. and I can trade jordan later if I want. I dunno, maybe it's just my league but TE's don't get any of us any real points. 20 yd's per 1 point and the standard 6 for a TD. I understand you starting Jax and Brown all of the games. I probably would too. However, when bye weeks come, you might have Gore there, and right now, that looks a lot better than Jordan. What if one of your RB's get hurt, who then. You really want Jordan. The Raiders look out of place in the NFL. There preseason was just as bad as the beating they got with the Chargers, so their should be no surprise here. Another reason I don't like Jordan is because his line just SUCKS. Jordan is a good back, but really, who could have a good game with that line. However, if you feel you need a good TE that bad then take the deal. As long as both RB's stay healthy then it may pay off for you, but you will have less quality depth. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bobpate17 0 Posted September 15, 2006 I dunno, maybe it's just my league but TE's don't get any of us any real points. 20 yd's per 1 point and the standard 6 for a TD. I understand you starting Jax and Brown all of the games. I probably would too. However, when bye weeks come, you might have Gore there, and right now, that looks a lot better than Jordan. What if one of your RB's get hurt, who then. You really want Jordan. The Raiders look out of place in the NFL. There preseason was just as bad as the beating they got with the Chargers, so their should be no surprise here. Another reason I don't like Jordan is because his line just SUCKS. Jordan is a good back, but really, who could have a good game with that line. However, if you feel you need a good TE that bad then take the deal. As long as both RB's stay healthy then it may pay off for you, but you will have less quality depth. PPr league 6pts for TD, 10 yards rec/rush = 1 point. gonzo got 24 points last week in our league. thanks for feedback though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bobpate17 0 Posted September 15, 2006 I still can't make up my mind. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
throttlers 0 Posted September 15, 2006 It's close, but I like what B gets. I think Gore can be traded for more right now while he is hot. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=233083 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bunnerjk 0 Posted September 15, 2006 You guys are crazy, Gore will have a better season than Jordan. KEEP GORE, Jordan is gonna be a huge bust!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SoulDoubt 0 Posted September 15, 2006 The problem with Gonzalez is that Green is now out. Oakland is a mess so Jordan like Moss is a question mark. Gore is hot because of his first game but remember what team he's on and he also has a surgically repaired knee. Moulds had a nice came but I think he'll end up the type of guy you'd use in a flex position depending on his opponent. Wiggins looks decent. Depending on your line up I think A stands to gain the most. This hinges on Green coming back in 2-3 weeks and whether or not he's affected by the concussion. If Oakland gets their crap together they could at least have a decent offense so Lamont could have a decent season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bobpate17 0 Posted September 15, 2006 The problem with Gonzalez is that Green is now out. Oakland is a mess so Jordan like Moss is a question mark. Gore is hot because of his first game but remember what team he's on and he also has a surgically repaired knee. Moulds had a nice came but I think he'll end up the type of guy you'd use in a flex position depending on his opponent. Wiggins looks decent. Depending on your line up I think A stands to gain the most. This hinges on Green coming back in 2-3 weeks and whether or not he's affected by the concussion. If Oakland gets their crap together they could at least have a decent offense so Lamont could have a decent season. We start 2RB, 2WR, 1TE, 1QB. I have driver and wayne as my two WR and Jackson and Brown for my two RBs. Gores is most likely gon be my bye fill in. and Gonzo had one TD even after green was gone so that's why I have higher expectation on him. this topic is almost split in half. littel more help. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mlmeloy 0 Posted September 15, 2006 This is very close and, in my opinion, a very fair trade. However, I would rather have Jordan and Tony G. I think selling Gore now is wise; he doesn't get to play Arizona every week, and L. Jordan doesn't have to play the Chargers every week. Week two might look bad for you, since Jordan will not fare much better against Baltimore. However, weeks 4 and 5 will be productive ones for Jordan. 3 things that tips the scales in favor of Jordan and Gonzo: 1) In PPR leagues, I expect Jordan to be catching lots of balls, even in losing games. (Oak had a bad season last year, but Jordan still managed to have a productive year) 2) SF has a slightly tougher schedule 3) Gonzo was targeted like a million times in the 4th quarter of week 1. Huard's arrival may actually make Gonzo more valuable. In any case, good luck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
urmother 0 Posted September 15, 2006 jordan/gonzo easy. jordan will be as good as gore this year and you get the huge upgrade at TE (green got smacked good, but it's not like he broke his throwing arm or hasn't been hit before, he's a vet.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mlmeloy 0 Posted September 15, 2006 One last thing that occurred to me. Gore and Jackson have the same bye week. When week seven rolls around, you will be stuck with Barber. Better to have Jordan playing Arizona that week. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nprice1776 0 Posted September 15, 2006 I think A is getting the better deal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hart Attack 0 Posted September 15, 2006 I think Team A is getting the better deal since he already has Jackson and Brown and can only start 2RBs. Team A should make the trade and get an upgrade at TE. I dont think Green being out will hurt Gonzalez like it will KC WRs. It may actually help. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=233253 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ziggyschiefs 0 Posted September 16, 2006 i think i'd do it if i'm team A, you can let jordan sit the bench 'til he starts doing something and then trade him high or use him he's bound to come around sometime. gonzo is a great TE, much better than wig and you're not giving up a whole lot with moulds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
c_Weezie 3 Posted September 16, 2006 I like whoever gets LaMont and Gonzo. Thanks for responding to mine earlier. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites