hawkvike 0 Posted December 7, 2006 I have been using Henry for the last 3-4 weeks as my #4 WR, but with him playing the Oak tough pass defense and Battle playing the putrid GB pass defense I am thinking about making a change. The only reason I am asking is that I have to drop Lundy to start Battle. Lundy is my #4 RB, but could have some value at some point. So my question is, should I drop Lundy and start Battle or should I stick with what I have and start Henry. Thanks for any help. Post a link to your question and I will definitely answer it soon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ryedog 0 Posted December 7, 2006 YES! Absolutely start Battle against a B.R.U.T.A.L GB pass defense! Thx for mine but you did not answer the WR portion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bkros42 0 Posted December 7, 2006 hard to give u a solid answer w/out knowing your team or ne thing.. but i think both will net you about the same, with battle i think a better chance to score but i think palmer can take the bengels down the field often... so a tough decision Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GRAPHIC VIOLENCE 0 Posted December 7, 2006 Henry hasn't done much lately so I would go with Battle too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maqs31 0 Posted December 7, 2006 Tough call when you throw WALIIIIII in the mix! Not sure who your 1-3 backs are, but if you really need the victory, I'd drop and get Battle in there. Even Chad had a day against GB, and I'm a JET fan, so believe me, I know! http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=258307 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ronks 0 Posted December 7, 2006 I have been using Henry for the last 3-4 weeks as my #4 WR, but with him playing the Oak tough pass defense and Battle playing the putrid GB pass defense I am thinking about making a change. The only reason I am asking is that I have to drop Lundy to start Battle. Lundy is my #4 RB, but could have some value at some point. So my question is, should I drop Lundy and start Battle or should I stick with what I have and start Henry. Thanks for any help. Post a link to your question and I will definitely answer it soon. It would be better to know your 1-3 RBs, but without knowing that information I would stick with Henry. Lundy might produce a little in future so I wouldn't want to lose him for a fraction of an upgrade (if any) at WR. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dachtor 0 Posted December 7, 2006 I don't know man...... Battle may be a decent SF option with a favorable matchup but I think SF is going to use a heavy dose of Gore vs. that GB defense. If you need Lundy at all the rest of the year, I wouldn't drop him. Tough to understand why you can't drop Henry and pick up Battle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hawkvike 0 Posted December 7, 2006 My top three RB's are Parker, McGahee, and Betts. I can only use 2 of them per week. I don't want to drop Henry because I will use him over Battle the rest of the year and unless something unusual happens, I will not need Lundy. I just want to know if Battle will give me an upgrade over Henry or not? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Groundhog 24 Posted December 7, 2006 definitely Battle. Great matchup for him, terrible matchup for Henry, recently made worse by more injuries to the Bengals O-line. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Madler 6 Posted December 7, 2006 I would go with Battle too. Henry has not done much last few times. Thanks for mine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nomad99 744 Posted December 7, 2006 I have been using Henry for the last 3-4 weeks as my #4 WR, but with him playing the Oak tough pass defense and Battle playing the putrid GB pass defense I am thinking about making a change. The only reason I am asking is that I have to drop Lundy to start Battle. Lundy is my #4 RB, but could have some value at some point. So my question is, should I drop Lundy and start Battle or should I stick with what I have and start Henry. Thanks for any help. Post a link to your question and I will definitely answer it soon. I say Henry.......he is off again/on again......but sneaky good sometimes. 2 weeks ago he found paydirt twice. Oak has a decent pass D but they will look to cover Chad & whosyourmamma.....I think Henry hauls in a deep one this week Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cjsks 0 Posted December 8, 2006 I like Henry better even without factoring in the loss of Lundy. Oaklands secondary is obviously good but I don't know if they can blanket a recieving corp as deep as cincy's... Good luck! Here's mine: http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=258233 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites