Al Gore's lies exposed yet again.

[Recliner Pilot 61]

See Retarded Pilot, you insinuated in your original post that your link was not funded by Exxon. When I said it was you asked me to prove it, which I did. You asked me why that makes it less credible and I explained how Big Oil deliberately lied in front of Congress not to mention how they had to offer money to scientists to dismiss GW. Considering that Big Oil's purpose is to make lots of money/profit, they have a vested interest in discrediting GW. If you cannot see how all that hurts their credibility, well then you probably believed Big Tobacco when they said smoking doesn't cause cancer and nicotene isn't addictive. Lastly, I provided you with reasons why other planets might be warming (Gases, dust storms, volcanic activity, etc.)

 

You still haven't posted your Proof that the sun is solely responsible for GW.

I asked for specifics on your view of the environment and what should be done if anything.

You claimed that Exxon's funding was only a small amount but then was unable to back up your claim so you had to back track.

You said that I was "looking for certain answers that I didn't get" which is BS!

You're implying that I'm saying that you want to cut down every tree, poison the rivers and lakes, starve old people, kick puppies, or eat babies for dinner. Come on now!

...Drobeski is right, there needs to be a "just shut the fock up for once and get a focking life already option"

 

So before you start misstating my arguments why don't you go up a couple of posts and read my answer to the question "TheBlade" asked me. Then when you're done, read the first line of his response. It should look something like this:

 

Take a good look at it because that's the closest a phrase like that will ever get to one of your posts!

 

 

When did you prove this study was funded by Exxon? You claimed a previous organization recieved some money from Exxon. You have brought nothing that shows Exxon funded this study. Does the origin of funding automatically discount the findings of a study? Apparently to you it does...........unless it's one of your studies funded by left-wing, invironmental nutjobs with an agenda.

 

You whole position is based on a former organization getting some money from Exxon. You failed to addres a single one of the 35 issues raised by the study. If you read them they are well supported. And all you have is "Evil big oil" this, and "evil big oil" that.

 

Someohow in your mind if the oil industry looks to defend itself against the attacks of these studies done by leftist nutjobs they are just "in it for the money", and anything that goes against your preconcieved agenda has no basis in fact. I played your silly game and exposed your links, and who funded them, in an earlier post. Using your logic your links are shat because of who funds them. I guess your real objection is the fact oil companies are in business to make money.

 

As for me jumping through your silly hoops explaining in detail what I think should be done for the environment............it ain't happening. I don't care to explain myself to you beyond saying what I have already said on the subject.

 

I have posted many links in the past proving the Sun is causing the earth to warm, so I won't jump through hoops for ya on that one either. I will ask this (and you will ignore it just as you have my other questions): Have you heard of Ice Ages? We have had several over the course of Earth's existance. How did the Earth come out of all those before Algore was causing "GW" with his mega-mansion and private jets? Can't wait until your Mechanical Engineer explains that using his "junior level" fluid dynamics.

[Flashover 0]

You wont post a link to your proof that it's solely the sun that's responsible for GW.

You won't answer any questions about your views on the environment and what should be done about it if anything.

You claim that if a study says that man contributes to GW then it's funded by left-wing, invironmental nutjobs with an agenda. Yeah, everyone but you is crazy!

You won't post a link proving that Exxon accounted for only a small amount of funding, which you claimed it did. I understand why you tried to distance your study from Exxon. If you want a link to why their credibility is lacking because of this, well here it is: Link

 

I'm not asking you to "jump through hoops". I am asking for you to prove that the sun is solely responsible for GW, which is your argument! Since you believe that it's "Just the sun stoopid" I'm curious if you think anything should be done about the environment, and I was looking for a little more then "I care about the environment" and "Pollution is bad". Again, that's not asking you to jump through hoops, it's called trying to have a debate idiot!

 

You won't back up your arguments and you refuse to say what your view on the environment is and what should be done if anything. It's hard to have a debate when one side refuses to explain their side of the argument. I've answered your questions but until you back up your claims and tell us your views on what should be done about the environment if anything, this thread is over. At least until you start another thread saying it's cold outside so GW must be a myth. This thread has been a waste of time, much like you Retarded Pilot. No wonder everyone thinks your a joke! It's because you are!

[Recliner Pilot 61]

:yawn:

 

Once again you fail to address at least ONE of the 35 lies exposed in my link.

 

You also fail to address how Ice Ages have come and gone without man driving SUVs to fight back the glaciers.

 

Why should I post a link showing the amount of funding Exxon has provided this study when you have failed to show us even $1 coming for Exxon to fund this study.

[Flashover 0]

Post your link that proves the sun is solely responsible for GW.......coward!

[Recliner Pilot 61]

Post your link that proves the sun is solely responsible for GW.......coward!

 

 

Keep avoiding all 35 of Algore's lies exposed in my original link, coward.