trade vetoed

[ChazzyCelotts 1]

guy in my league lost colston and i had vince young

 

so to make our team better at each position we traded cassel for crayton

 

but it was veteod by league

 

is the trade fair

 

his wr core is

 

start 3

 

calvin

galloway

RASHED DAVIS

 

my qbs are start 2

 

favre

young

o sullivan

 

 

is this trade fair

 

any input helps

passing tds 4

 

all others 6

 

25yds per point for qb

 

15 for all else

[ChazzyCelotts 1]

anything

 

i feel there should be no reason to veto that trade because it helps out both teams

[stiles22 0]

That's ridiculous. Cassel is such a wildcard and unknown that you could justify trading him for almost anybody. He could be boom or bust, and certainly is worth a trade for Crayton.

[ffsmack 0]

Definitely fair, shouldn't have been vetoed.

[kfaris 0]

Bad veto

[Mr. Thanksgiving 0]

i agree. terrible use of veto power.

[Ray_T 754]

I also agree.

 

the trade makes sense. one of you needs a QB one of you needs a WR. Neither is considered a stud at this point in their career. In fact, Both are fringe starters.

 

This may be one of the worst uses of the veto power I've ever seen. This should be used for dangerously lopsided trades. not for stuff like this.

 

First, I'd ask for an explanation of the Veto in Writing, and re-state your case. If they wont hear it, or wont provide an explanation, I'd consider finding myself a different league next year. anyone who would veto this, would also veto any deal that you can do to help your team.