Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
yodaday

Who got the better deal?

Who got the better deal?  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. Romo-LJ-McGahee vs McFadden-ChrisJohnson-Schaub

    • Romo-LarryJohnson-McGahee
      25
    • McFadden-ChrisJohnson-Schaub
      21


Recommended Posts

Guest RenoZ

Are you bragging about your "fleecing" the league idiot or whining about another guy beating you to it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest BernardPollardFan

this trade all depends on who else is on their rosters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest RenoZ
this trade all depends on who else is on their rosters.

 

No, no it doesn't.

 

That logic can be used when different positions are involved...not when the trade involves QB, RB, RB on both sides.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Team A

QB: Romo, Warner

RB: LJ, McGahee, JStewart

WR: BMarshall, JCotchery, BBerrian

 

Team B

QB: Schaub, Delhomme

RB: Gore, McFadden, ChrisJohnson

WR: AndreJohnson, LeeEvans, Bryant Johnson

 

 

Team A has downward RBs in LJ (bad offense) and McGahee (rbbc likely). Has 2 elite QBs.

Team B needs upgrade QB and both McFadden & CJohnson are potentially hit/miss type players

 

Basically, Team B is giving away young RBs with high upside potential for QB upgrade, while Team A is ridding RBs in bad situations for unproven RBs with high potential but have to give up Romo in order to do so.

 

Thus the trade.

 

Now which team has a better deal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm apparently in the minority by looking at the votes, but i think the trade basically comes down to this. Romo for D MAC and Chris Johnson because all the other players involved are trash. I would go with the two RB's. I like Romo, but the guy has Warner to step right in. I think the guy giving up Romo has the better team post trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm apparently in the minority by looking at the votes, but i think the trade basically comes down to this. Romo for D MAC and Chris Johnson because all the other players involved are trash. I would go with the two RB's. I like Romo, but the guy has Warner to step right in. I think the guy giving up Romo has the better team post trade.

Okay, this is what I'm trying to find out from FFtoday community's general thinking:

 

LJ AND MCGAHEE ARE JUNKS!

 

I know it's only been 2 weeks into the season, but their outlooks are very bleak. KC offense looked horrific, especially against Raiders defense which dead last in 07 against the run.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you bragging about your "fleecing" the league idiot or whining about another guy beating you to it?

Well I am Team A trading away Romo-LJ-McGahee.

From the votes, looks like the community is saying I got the short end of the deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, no it doesn't.

 

That logic can be used when different positions are involved...not when the trade involves QB, RB, RB on both sides.

 

wrong.

 

if one roster is full of young guys with potential he may want to make a trade for more proven guys to help him now.

 

the other guy may have a bunch of stars about to go past their prime and is looking to deal them for future studs.

 

the rest of your roster can always matter

 

especially if its a keeper league

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest RenoZ
especially if its a keeper league

 

This, I agree with.

 

I don't play in any keeper leagues and, therefore, respond as if everything is a redraft. That would be a HUGE factor in this deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest BernardPollardFan
No, no it doesn't.

 

That logic can be used when different positions are involved...not when the trade involves QB, RB, RB on both sides.

Um yes, yes it does.

 

 

If you were really being logical, instead of just throwing out the word, you'd see that this trade makes one team stronger at QB and the other team stronger at RB. Now that I see that the team that sold Romo has Warner on his bench, it makes a lot more sense, because he upgraded at RB without taking much of a hit at QB.

 

 

THAT is why you need to know the other players on the teams to evaluate this deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×