Calvin, Hakeem, Knox and Clayton

[IMMensaMind 462]

You know the drill: also - this league has a distance bonus (0-9yd TDs=6pts; 10-39yd TDs=9pts; 40+yd TDs=12pts) as well. I need two of these guys.

 

Normally, I'd plug in Calvin and Hakeem, but my gut is telling me that the Packer/Bear MNF game will be a shootout, and I'm sensing Knox may have a big game, so I'm not at all sure. Here are their matchups:

 

Calvin @ MIN

Hakeem vs. TEN

Clayton vs. WAS

Knox vs. GB

 

Does anyone support the idea of sitting Calvin, and going with either Clayton or Knox? I also have Best going vs. MIN, so that enters the equation re: sitting Johnson. I'm torn, and - with losing Ryan Mathews for at least a week, and needing to win (I have to run with Ronnie Brown to replace Mathews), this is the key decision in my lineup.

 

Throw it out there!

[TimHauck 3,307]

I'd stick with Calvin and Nicks. Honestly I'd probably consider Clayton before Knox but not enough to bench Calvin or Nicks for.

[Melissa Stark 1]

Ugly to chose from

Ganna go Calvin and Clayton

[Boilermaker04 11]

Nicks averages a touchdown every 5 catches. Do you want to start Calvin or Knox? Answer seems pretty simple: Calvin.

 

Clayton's numbers are going to decrease as Bradford becomes more comfortable with the rest of his targets.

[Scooter1027 0]

Agree with most, Calvin and Nicks. Too good of players to sit. I do like Knox's chances this week to have a nice game, but I wouldn't play him over those two.

[Joscellin 0]

There's just something I don't really trust about Knox. I think I would also go with Calvin and Nicks here. I'd really rather go with Clayton than Knox at this point, even.